Here's something you might be interested in.
It's certainly ironic that Brown's best bet at selling Prop 30 is California Attorney General Kamala Harris. He's banking on Harris' likeability and her "appearance" of integrity. Why? Because Harris was just named in a 43 TRILLION dollar RICO and money laundering lawsuit.
In fact it was Harris that gave the Prop an appealing ballot title—"Temporary taxes to fund education. Guaranteed local public safety funding." (In theory, the rates are supposed to expire in seven years.) And the Legislative Analyst's Office then wrote a fiscal-impact statement estimating that the tax hike would raise $6 billion annually.
Public unions have spent more than $30 million dollars supporting the measure. But Brown also collected about $5 million from big multi-national corporations, according to financial filings with the secretary of state. His biggest corporate sponsors just happen to belong to the state's most heavily regulated industries—oil and gas, telecommunications, health and auto insurance and liquor. Hmmmmm, think they want anything in return? Think they are going to approve massive rate hikes if this passes?
Occidental Petroleum contributed $500,000 to the governor's campaign.
So news that Harris is being implicated in the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History goes right along with the lack of integrity displayed by the Prop 30 campaign.
I know it's such a large number it sounds like fiction, but it's not. Here is a link and quote straight from the Wall Street Journal's Marketwatch:link text
"NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Spire Law Group, LLP's national home owners' lawsuit, pending in the venue where the "Banksters" control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) - known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the "Banksters" and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers - now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the "Banksters" located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests."
And here is the Case number so you can look it up for yourself. (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML).
Well it must be some crazy person with a lot of money and a crazier law firm. Actually it's the Spire Law Group, LLP whose national law firm's motto is "the public should be protected -- at all costs -- from corruption in whatever form it presents itself." The Firm has more than 250-years of experience in a span of matters ranging from representing large corporations and wealthy individuals, to also representing the general public. The Firm is known for being at the front lines suing government officials, banks, defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption was enabled and perpetrated.
The suit comes in response to the findings of Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other "bailout money" has ever been repaid--exactly what I have been saying all along.
The suit claims the dfendents used multiple money laundering schemes including the following venues: Switzerland, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Cypress and entities controlled by governments adverse to the interests of the United States Sanctions and Embargo Act against Iran, and are also identified in both the United Nations and the U.S. Senate's recent reports on international money laundering. According to MarketWatch:
"Many of these entities have already been personally served with summons and process of the complaint during the last six months. It is now beyond dispute that, while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for home owners by "Banksters", it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole trillions of dollars of home owners' and taxpayers' money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies."
Here are the named defendents:
"Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former "communications director" for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign)."
What do you know Bank of America is also one of the biggest proponents of this tax hike in CA.
Well just in case you needed more reasons not to trust the motley crue of sketchy politicians and CEOs, here's a BIG ONE!
It's certainly ironic that Brown's best bet at selling Prop 30 is California Attorney General Kamala Harris. He's banking on Harris' likeability and her "appearance" of integrity. Why? Because Harris was just named in a 43 TRILLION dollar RICO and money laundering lawsuit.
In fact it was Harris that gave the Prop an appealing ballot title—"Temporary taxes to fund education. Guaranteed local public safety funding." (In theory, the rates are supposed to expire in seven years.) And the Legislative Analyst's Office then wrote a fiscal-impact statement estimating that the tax hike would raise $6 billion annually.
Public unions have spent more than $30 million dollars supporting the measure. But Brown also collected about $5 million from big multi-national corporations, according to financial filings with the secretary of state. His biggest corporate sponsors just happen to belong to the state's most heavily regulated industries—oil and gas, telecommunications, health and auto insurance and liquor. Hmmmmm, think they want anything in return? Think they are going to approve massive rate hikes if this passes?
Occidental Petroleum contributed $500,000 to the governor's campaign.
So news that Harris is being implicated in the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History goes right along with the lack of integrity displayed by the Prop 30 campaign.
I know it's such a large number it sounds like fiction, but it's not. Here is a link and quote straight from the Wall Street Journal's Marketwatch:link text
"NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Spire Law Group, LLP's national home owners' lawsuit, pending in the venue where the "Banksters" control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) - known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the "Banksters" and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers - now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the "Banksters" located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests."
And here is the Case number so you can look it up for yourself. (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML).
Well it must be some crazy person with a lot of money and a crazier law firm. Actually it's the Spire Law Group, LLP whose national law firm's motto is "the public should be protected -- at all costs -- from corruption in whatever form it presents itself." The Firm has more than 250-years of experience in a span of matters ranging from representing large corporations and wealthy individuals, to also representing the general public. The Firm is known for being at the front lines suing government officials, banks, defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption was enabled and perpetrated.
The suit comes in response to the findings of Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other "bailout money" has ever been repaid--exactly what I have been saying all along.
The suit claims the dfendents used multiple money laundering schemes including the following venues: Switzerland, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Cypress and entities controlled by governments adverse to the interests of the United States Sanctions and Embargo Act against Iran, and are also identified in both the United Nations and the U.S. Senate's recent reports on international money laundering. According to MarketWatch:
"Many of these entities have already been personally served with summons and process of the complaint during the last six months. It is now beyond dispute that, while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for home owners by "Banksters", it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole trillions of dollars of home owners' and taxpayers' money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies."
Here are the named defendents:
"Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former "communications director" for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign)."
What do you know Bank of America is also one of the biggest proponents of this tax hike in CA.
Well just in case you needed more reasons not to trust the motley crue of sketchy politicians and CEOs, here's a BIG ONE!