Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Close to Home — What it’s like on the street where you live
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Report blasts CPUC's laxity toward safety
I agree that Brown won't remove Peevey as President of the CPUC. As I have said here many times before, if he didn't do it after San Bruno, he's not going to do it at all. And even if he did, who would replace him? NONE of Brown's "gang of three, Florio,Sandoval and Ferron, has stepped up and shown the kind of leadership needed as President and Carla Peterman hasn't even been confirmed by the Senate yet. No I think we are stuck with Peevey at least until his current term on the Commission is up, 2015 I think. And who knows about then.— April 18, 2013 11:21 a.m.
For-profit college to pay $700,000 fine for falsifying records
So I guess the Sand Diego of today is no different than the San Diego of back then?? Is that your intended meaning?? LOL— April 18, 2013 9:17 a.m.
For-profit college to pay $700,000 fine for falsifying records
Which is why he and his dog have a statue. To recognize his ability to influence his readers in the direction the money men wanted things to go. Thank God for Jim Murray!! LOL— April 18, 2013 9:15 a.m.
For-profit college to pay $700,000 fine for falsifying records
Don Bauder Again, note the LOL. More sarcastic humor. The question was purely rhetorical. Isn't the phrase banking regulator kind of an oxymoron. I mean , we all know banks do what they want, despite regulations. and for sure we all know that banking regulators don't act...they react. LOL x2— April 18, 2013 9:05 a.m.
For-profit college to pay $700,000 fine for falsifying records
Visduh Don't forget about Jack Murphy. I have always read that he was the one who convinced Baron Hilton to move the Chargers to San Diego. Imagine a san Diego with no Padres AND no Chargers. The shades of gray would have been much, much darker. LOL— April 17, 2013 5:58 p.m.
Possible portent: helmet maker found liable in football injury
Psycholizard this kid got hurt in 2008. All of the helmet manufactures have made multiple design changes since then. Riddell even has a helmet with sensors that sends a wireless signal with data on the intensity of the hits. Wanna buy one for your kid? It's only a grand. I don't see any current equipment being banned.— April 17, 2013 5:49 p.m.
For-profit college to pay $700,000 fine for falsifying records
Don Bauder FYI. LOL (laughing out loud) usually denotes some type of humor, in this case sarcasm. Am I safe in assuming that your reference to banking regulators acting sooner is also sarcasm? LOL— April 17, 2013 4:51 p.m.
Past and present officials from three South Bay school districts arraigned
Well, I don't live in SD and before today, It's probably been a year or more since I visited the UT site except for occasional sports related info. As such whether or not you comment there has no more impact on me than what the writes in it's stories. Which is to say none. As for your comment as to determining if it is worthwhile to comment at all on the U-T site, that is not what you said. Your previous comment was '' Should we try and post and find out if we are allowed, or what is allowed?''. That is what I addressed. Whether or not it is worthwhile is: A). nothing that interests me in the slightest and is B). an individual point of view based on C). what you are trying to accomplish.— April 17, 2013 4:26 p.m.
For-profit college to pay $700,000 fine for falsifying records
Don Bauder But think about it. Had Smith not done his dirty deeds, it's very possible, if not likely, that he would never have been able to buy the PCL Padres, and therefore never getting the MLB expansion SD Padres. One can only imagine the sad state of affairs in San Diego had the MLB Padres not come to town. LOL— April 17, 2013 10:36 a.m.
Past and present officials from three South Bay school districts arraigned
eastlaker after 5 yrs of commenting on the Reader, you really can't be that much of a neophyte in terms of commenting. First off, comments are either "allowed" or they aren't. As for what is allowed, those are set by filters. Look at the TOS of any site allowing comments and it's spelled out. A brief look showed no recent stories about Sweetwater that had comments turned off. If editors don't want comments critical of Sweetwater in general or of specific individuals, specific words or phrases would be filtered. However since I just read a comment critical of both Sweetwater and Brand and his band of gypsies, that doesn't appear to be the case. And maybe people just don't care about commenting there much anymore because they switched to facebook for comments. Across the board, the number of comments have dropped precipitously for sites requiring the use of facebook to post. U-T is no exception— April 17, 2013 10:28 a.m.