Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Cartmill for Sweetwater board — get real
Mission accomplished - we must remain civil, there are innocents in all of this - children, wives and husbands must be left out of the discussion unless it is to praise. I understand that Cartmills daughter is lovely and bright - and am told his wife is a very nice person - both adore him and rightfully so as he is their family.— July 18, 2014 9:08 a.m.
We don’t want the stinkin’ charter expansion
Wabbitsd - surely that is not the reason for all of these construction adjustments we are seeing on the agenda.— July 17, 2014 2:09 p.m.
We don’t want the stinkin’ charter expansion
More covert operations, why? We are the ones paying the bills surely we should be advised about what is going on? Why is Karl Bradley the Property Manager, we pay his salary out of our public school funds? When is the cycle of secrecy going to stop? Fresh start, yes we too want a fresh start, but we will not be played for fools. Folks Trujillo left here 23 years ago - that is a long time to be putting up with alleged corruption. Lets all claim Missouri status - you know the SHOW ME STATE. We are up to our necks in platitudes, promises, frilly little words like transparency. Yes, SHOW US, stop telling us to trust you - SHOW US. PUT SOME VERBS IN THOSE SENTENCES AND THEN ACT ON THEM. More of the same - ah, that would be a NO, maybe a HELL NO!!!!!— July 17, 2014 11:24 a.m.
Who’s minding the jewels?
While I believe it is important to respect the law, rules and wishes of the people, I stand by my right of freedom of speech ( not that some wouldn't mind me coming down with lock jaw and lock fingers, chuckle). I was against the breaking up of our community and the requirement that you could only vote for your representative based on geographical location. Last time I checked when the Board casts a vote for my home schools they all vote, not simply my area member, but all of them and this will continue. Yet, here I am unable to vote for the other 4. While I can not vote for them, I CAN DONATE to their campaigns and I am able to support them verbally. Eastlake folk, ah yes. SOOOOOO many good people, intelligent, wanting the best for their children yet unlike persons like myself paying BIG, BIG tax bills and for the most part totally tuned out to what has happened and is continuing to happen at their community schools. Barbque, you are correct, each community would be better served if they backed a candidate - however, each person does have the right to seek a seat if that is their wish. I have gone on record and stated I will be supporting Mr. Kevin O'Neil in his area. I have, for over 2 years watched Mr. O'Neill while he served on the BOC (Bond Oversight Committee). He is a straight shooter, has his own mind, is intelligent, a successful self made man who truly loves his community. Having said that, O'Neill and I do not agree on all issues - I am not, nor should any of us be, looking to vote for yes women/men - but what we should be looking to endorse are persons of integrity. I am waiting to hear of other candidates for other areas, including my own. I will be asking their permission prior to endorsing them - for some strange reason some might see me as controversial, imagine that. One thing for sure I WANT CANDIDATES WHO ARE GOING TO CONDUCT THE PUBLICS BUSINESS IN PUBLIC. I would respectfully ask all voting to vote for the candidate who will do the best job in their opinion - regardless of party or union backing. Candidates who, when asked the tough questions will answer - I am sick to death of the bs we are so use to hearing. just my opinion Be sure to plan on attending the meeting on the 21st, it is about the property!!!!— July 14, 2014 5:41 p.m.
Who’s minding the jewels?
oskidoll - those public hearings you refer to - funny, that there is no mention of the meeting on the 21st, AT THE DISTRICT OFFICE, on the District website. Akin to that saying of Kevin O'Neill's- 'hide the bacon'. Or in our case 'rip off in the millions'.— July 14, 2014 6:34 a.m.
Who’s minding the jewels?
While Mr. Calhoun is claiming the agreement has never been in effect, it sure does seem as though the details signed off by Ms. Russo and promised to Mr. Diamond and his two partners (and no doubt instructed by Brand) are being enforced from what we can see - the 'one third of 'net cash savings' - well I guess they are keeping that secret til the deal is done. From my perspective and opinion perhaps a better name for the deal should have been 'we4RIPoffbyED' The meeting on the 21st should definitely be attended by all of those running for the Board - as this will, undoubtedly be a hot topic during the campaigns. It is imperative that the 'new' 5 Board members not only know how to spell 'transparency', they should also be committed to implimenting it. Ending on a positive note 5, NEW Board members - fresh faces, new ideas and most importantly integrity.— July 14, 2014 6:28 a.m.
Who’s minding the jewels?
Chris Schilling - I was advised of the meeting via a community member email. Also Board Docs are up and Mr. Glover's contract is an agendized item.— July 12, 2014 10:07 a.m.
Who’s minding the jewels?
Woodchuck - per the wording in the agreement: Net cash savings (savings) Definition of savings as found in agreement - (Gross sales price less costs), plus additional savings Definition of additional savings - the Developer will prepare a detail list of the additional savings together with the evidence of their accomplishment supporting said savings to Escrow within five (5) business days of entering into escrow with a buyer. The District will approve the additional savings, WHOSE APPROVAL WILL NOT BE UNDULY DENIED. Respectfully submitted UNLEASH THE LAWYERS ------— July 11, 2014 6:43 p.m.
Who’s minding the jewels?
Ms. Luzzaro: would it be possible to put the Participation Agreement up? We understand it is still being debated as to whether it can be enforced?— July 11, 2014 5:40 p.m.
Who’s minding the jewels?
bbq - I would recommend that you do a PRA and request the Participation Agreement that Russo signed with Diamond and the others. It is not only troubling but it reeks of the 'L STREET DEBACLE ALL OVER AGAIN'. Ms. Russo did not sign that agreement without direction from Brand - come on, we all know that. When you see what was given away you will be made physically ill. oldchulares - hopefully once Mr. Glover is made aware of Brands continued involvement he will send the clear message Tim Glover is the Superintendent of SUHSD, NOT Ed Brand. Having said all of that - why have all of the discussions regarding property been done in Closed session, i.e. The Harold Place deal - was that discussion done in full view of the very persons paying the bills - NO - can someone explain that to me? SOMETHING IS UP, AND THAT SOMETHING IS NOT GOOD - for if it was we would know about it. bbq - while I have heard great things about Mr. Glover, and am holding out all hopes that we are headed in a new direction - the fact That Tom Calhoun is playing word games about the Participation Agreement points in the direction of 'conspiracy'. The 'properties' - ah, we are talking about freakin' MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS, AND THEREFORE A PRIORITY - and what are we being given BS......— July 11, 2014 8:43 a.m.