Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Early Morning--13-Jun-2010
CityBeat can have him, with whipped cream and a cherry on top. It's always a pleasure to read your blog posts, RobbieBear. I know sometimes you post and the post gets pushed off the home page by others before anyone gets to read or comment, but, unlike another poster here, you don't complain that all the attention isn't on you, you just quietly keep writing and posting when you have something interesting to share. Thanks! :)— June 21, 2010 5:54 p.m.
...monday madness...
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!— June 21, 2010 4:18 p.m.
None
Thanks for that information, a2z, I will look into it.— June 21, 2010 4:13 p.m.
Old Gringo
Agree about Fonda. I find her repugnant, and wouldn't give her a penny of my money. Movies, exercise tapes, books, she can take those and her apologies and stick them up her a$$.— June 21, 2010 2:54 a.m.
Through A Daughters Eyes.
Great post.— June 20, 2010 9:49 p.m.
Army sergeant comes back to San Diego from Afghanistan
Why's that?— June 20, 2010 8:30 p.m.
Army sergeant comes back to San Diego from Afghanistan
It does, Visduh. I agree with you on every point.— June 20, 2010 7:06 p.m.
Elusive Salvation
Amen, Diva.— June 20, 2010 7 p.m.
Army sergeant comes back to San Diego from Afghanistan
Wow, a2z. Thanks to you and Visduh for your service to this country. Visduh, this was the comment I was referring to, sorry for any confusion: "In recent months, I've found very little of Colin Powell to admire." My question meant, what was it about Powell that you didn't admire?— June 20, 2010 12:40 p.m.
Members Only
Matteo's silence speaks for itself. I had noticed the inconsistencies in her story about her invitation and the odd fact that the location was not open when she arrived there when I first read the story. The lie about the invitation was made abundantly clear by the rest of the story, and particularly in the video. No one stood to say that they had invited Matteo. Matteo herself did not point to anyone in the room and say, "This person invited me." She did not say that to the police officers who responded to the incident. In her video, she insists that she is at a "public meeting." All of this is clear indication that in fact she read wrong information from the Internet and went to the meeting with the deliberation intention of disrupting it, then presenting her edited version of how she was presumably mistreated and thrown out of the meeting. Ms. Matteo is perfectly free to prove me wrong. Provide the invitation. Oh, and while she's at it, she can also disclaim that she was not using a manufactured identity on another of her threads to support her story and attack posters. And when she's done with that, she can also tell us how she was not violating the TOS by revealing the presumed name of a poster, not once, not twice, but three times, on this site (and has gone so far as to post that information on a social networking site), and why this is not harassing, abusive, and vindictive conduct. Oh wait. I guess the Reader should be explaining that part. I suspect the silence will last quite a while longer.— June 20, 2010 7:45 a.m.