Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Angst in Del Mar over underground train tunnels
Environmental report lays out three options
To reroute trains off the eroding Del Mar bluffs, officials are trying to figure out where to put the underground tunnels that will run 300 feet deep in some parts of the city.
While the 1.7 mile LOSSAN Rail Realignment will also take place in portions of Solana Beach and San Diego, Del Mar is ground zero. Those who live there, worried about air pollution, sinkholes, noise, vibration, an active earthquake fault, and losing their homes have opposed most of the locations proposed so far.
To win more support for the project, which is expected to cost at least $4 billion dollars, the San Diego Association of Governments came up with more than a dozen options. Three of them have now been chosen for further study in a draft Environmental Impact Report the agency is preparing with the goal of producing a final version in 2026.
A notice of preparation for the report describes the three alternatives along Interstate 5, Crest Canyon, and Camino Del Mar. Each one would require a north and south portal, a tunnel connecting the portals, and double tracking of the rail line.
Favored by Del Mar is the I-5 alignment, a nearly seven- mile stretch that would descend just south of the Solana Beach Station, enter the Fairgrounds North Portal, continue south into the fairgrounds, then travel under the San Dieguito Lagoon to the west side of I-5.
Far less appealing to locals because it would affect many homes is the 5.3 mile long Crest Canyon Alignment that would descend south of the rail bridge over the San Dieguito Lagoon, enter the Jimmy Durante Boulevard North Portal, and continue southeast to exit at the knoll adjacent to I-5. The tracks would then rise as it transitions back into the existing railway north of the Sorrento Valley station.
A third option is Camino Del Mar. Nearly five miles long, it would also descend south of the rail bridge over the lagoon and enter a portal near the intersection of Jimmy Durante Boulevard and Camino Del Mar. It would exit from a southern portal at Torrey Pines Road and Carmel Valley Road onto a bridge over the Los Peñasquitos Lagoon. It would then transition back to the existing track.
Del Martians say the I-5 alignment under the Del Mar Fairgrounds and San Dieguito Lagoon is the only route that "disturbs no one," as one comment to the city reads.
The second option, Crest Canyon, would demolish homes, while the third would destroy Los Penasquitos lagoon "with a forever double track."
Those weighing in wondered if the hillside above Camino Del Mar, with a composition similar to the bluffs, would be able to handle the double tracked trains. Where will the runoff that gets absorbed by the hillside go when huge tunnels are built there?
SANDAG’s notice of preparation for its upcoming environmental report initiates a 45-day comment period when local agencies and residents can provide their written feedback. A public meeting will be held Tuesday from 6:00 – 7:30 p.m. at the San Diego Marriott Del Mar, 11966 El Camino Real.
The Coalition for Safer Trains, a local advocacy group, has submitted questions like why build a project with a 100- to 150-year lifespan in a floodplain with documented sea level rise and erosion?
The group is asking the agency to show the exact addresses of residential and commercial property expected to be taken by eminent domain for each portal option. Fifty homes are at risk, they say, and there are about 51 acres of home dwellers who will be over a tunnel, according to a study in 2017.
At a council meeting on Monday, Councilmember Dwight Worden said it's unlikely the agency will address eminent domain in the environmental report. But if it can be shown that a project splits a community, as this one surely does, the city would have more leverage.
"Most of the impacts are coming to us."
Here's something you might be interested in.
Angst in Del Mar over underground train tunnels
Environmental report lays out three options
Angst in Del Mar over underground train tunnels
Environmental report lays out three options
To reroute trains off the eroding Del Mar bluffs, officials are trying to figure out where to put the underground tunnels that will run 300 feet deep in some parts of the city.
While the 1.7 mile LOSSAN Rail Realignment will also take place in portions of Solana Beach and San Diego, Del Mar is ground zero. Those who live there, worried about air pollution, sinkholes, noise, vibration, an active earthquake fault, and losing their homes have opposed most of the locations proposed so far.
To win more support for the project, which is expected to cost at least $4 billion dollars, the San Diego Association of Governments came up with more than a dozen options. Three of them have now been chosen for further study in a draft Environmental Impact Report the agency is preparing with the goal of producing a final version in 2026.
A notice of preparation for the report describes the three alternatives along Interstate 5, Crest Canyon, and Camino Del Mar. Each one would require a north and south portal, a tunnel connecting the portals, and double tracking of the rail line.
Favored by Del Mar is the I-5 alignment, a nearly seven- mile stretch that would descend just south of the Solana Beach Station, enter the Fairgrounds North Portal, continue south into the fairgrounds, then travel under the San Dieguito Lagoon to the west side of I-5.
Far less appealing to locals because it would affect many homes is the 5.3 mile long Crest Canyon Alignment that would descend south of the rail bridge over the San Dieguito Lagoon, enter the Jimmy Durante Boulevard North Portal, and continue southeast to exit at the knoll adjacent to I-5. The tracks would then rise as it transitions back into the existing railway north of the Sorrento Valley station.
A third option is Camino Del Mar. Nearly five miles long, it would also descend south of the rail bridge over the lagoon and enter a portal near the intersection of Jimmy Durante Boulevard and Camino Del Mar. It would exit from a southern portal at Torrey Pines Road and Carmel Valley Road onto a bridge over the Los Peñasquitos Lagoon. It would then transition back to the existing track.
Del Martians say the I-5 alignment under the Del Mar Fairgrounds and San Dieguito Lagoon is the only route that "disturbs no one," as one comment to the city reads.
The second option, Crest Canyon, would demolish homes, while the third would destroy Los Penasquitos lagoon "with a forever double track."
Those weighing in wondered if the hillside above Camino Del Mar, with a composition similar to the bluffs, would be able to handle the double tracked trains. Where will the runoff that gets absorbed by the hillside go when huge tunnels are built there?
SANDAG’s notice of preparation for its upcoming environmental report initiates a 45-day comment period when local agencies and residents can provide their written feedback. A public meeting will be held Tuesday from 6:00 – 7:30 p.m. at the San Diego Marriott Del Mar, 11966 El Camino Real.
The Coalition for Safer Trains, a local advocacy group, has submitted questions like why build a project with a 100- to 150-year lifespan in a floodplain with documented sea level rise and erosion?
The group is asking the agency to show the exact addresses of residential and commercial property expected to be taken by eminent domain for each portal option. Fifty homes are at risk, they say, and there are about 51 acres of home dwellers who will be over a tunnel, according to a study in 2017.
At a council meeting on Monday, Councilmember Dwight Worden said it's unlikely the agency will address eminent domain in the environmental report. But if it can be shown that a project splits a community, as this one surely does, the city would have more leverage.
"Most of the impacts are coming to us."
Comments