Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
University Heights neighbors steaming over eight-story newbie
'They are rubber stamping everything'
The lot is nestled between a two-story apartment building and a classic Craftsman home.
Several dozen community members gathered in front of 4350 Cleveland Avenue (at Meade) in University Heights on Saturday April 15, to protest the pending 49-unit, eight-story “affordable housing” building slated for construction on the quiet residential street.
The lot is nestled between a two-story apartment building and a classic Craftsman home in this historic neighborhood.
“They haven’t told us exactly how many affordable units there will be out of the 49 here, but from what I understand it will be two.”
“I’ve been here 25 years,” neighbor Phil told me. “It’s just a shock that any structure so large would be put into a residential section of a neighborhood.”
However, the problem presents larger than just the building itself, it’s about how the city is churning out these not really "affordable living" buildings in random areas, with little oversight, zero community input, and in this case, zero benefit to the community.
Marc Johnson and Kristin Harms co-chairs of the grassroots organization, We Are University Heights organized the protest and spoke to me about what’s going on.
Marc Johnson and Kristin Harms co-chairs of the grassroots organization, We Are University Heights organized the protest.
“The community stumbled upon the permits for the 8-story building – with limited parking – and we all said what the heck, this is not the location for that,” Johnson explained. “They haven’t told us exactly how many affordable units there will be out of the 49 here but from what I understand it will be two.”
Additionally, San Diego has a strong Mayor system of government many believe exacerbates the issue:
“With ministerial approval it means within the development services department they can just sign off, there is no debate, no public disclosure, and they are rubber stamping everything,” Johnson said. “They’re planning to put about 40 to 50 more of these around University Heights and North Park.”
Johnson estimates more than 5,000 new residents will be coming into the area within the next few years and adding up all the projects on the horizon, the infrastructure is not there.
“We agree the housing crisis is 100 percent real in San Diego, but this is not going to solve that problem…our group is proposing several solutions-we are not opposed to affordable housing…we are not NIMBYS, we are saying yes in my backyard, in the right location, we want smart, targeted density,” Johnson added.
"These are luxury townhomes, they are not going to be affordable."
Bill Ellig who was a member of Uptown Planners for five years agrees:
“We were very much involved in the 2016 Uptown plan,” Ellig said. “Right now, in other parts of the city, like the Talmage area, SDSU, UTC area – they are going through a community planning process and there’s a lot of discussion there. That is where the discussion should take place, that’s where the planning should go in – not with these municipal code changes, Complete Communities, Complete Communities 2 and the rest of them which override our community plan. Things need to be planned, there’s a right place for it and a wrong place for it.
"We’re not saying oh no not here, there are probably a hundred units or more on this block because there are a lot of them behind that people don’t see, there’s a lot of natural infill, so, we need proper placement, proper transitions between the higher density and the lower density. At Meade & Park boulevard we have eight stories, right across the street a single-story family house, that is bad planning. The Complete Community Plan even says they have to have proper transitions…this is not rocket science, I’m sorry, but here we have outside investors who don’t live here that are buying up the properties.”
“I haven’t seen the report,” Johnson said. “And now there is talk about other programs being launched by the mayor and the Development Services Department, all of this stuff is moving ahead with no oversight because we have a mayor who is C.E.O. of the city....
We’re talking about possibly having a strong mayor referendum in 2024, there are people starting that groundwork. And we are recommending that the city stop the Complete Communities program, just stop it right here because it’s going to ruin our communities.”
“We want to see our community planners be empowered again to see the projects so that we can all go there and see what the developers propose, that’s how it used to work, we don’t get that anymore,” Harms stated.
In 2011, the planning department and development services were combined. “They do not belong together,” she continues. “Planning is about planning, about the community plan, about community input. Development services is about building – it’s about allowing stuff like this to go in, they do not belong together, they need to be split up.”
View of 4350 Cleveland from across the street
“None of this conversation is about whether we should be building, it's strictly about where should that housing go – and that’s the point we’re trying to get out.” Attendee resident Jeff explained: “It’s a fantastic opportunity to sort of reshape how we do planning and create community…the strong mayor system, we voted for it, we said okay let’s make the strong mayor system but it has turned out to be the autocratic system, we never thought the strong mayor system meant a weak council system. “
One woman who marched alongside Todd Gloria, feels he betrayed his climate action plan. “This is not protecting our environment. I marched with Todd Gloria some years ago for the Climate Action Plan and I thought he was a good guy, he was gonna help with climate and diversity. This is not going to provide diversity in our neighborhoods, these are luxury townhomes, they are not going to be affordable. I heard one politician say these townhomes are going to provide housing for the homeless, can you tell me what homeless person is going to be able to afford, at the least, $3,000 a month for housing? So, when it comes to climate change – this adds more density, more traffic…and this lovely Craftsman two-story home, what about their back yard, what if they’re growing their vegetables? What if they have solar panels? There is so much wrong with this, it betrays the Climate Action Plan that I believed in. Todd Gloria has betrayed us.”
“There isn’t any other tool in the box our politicians pull out except getting rid of regulations and allowing whatever’s happening,” Bill told me. “It’s absolutely crickets when you ask them what about rent control or a vacancy tax for units that are kept off the market. Crickets. And the problem is just getting worse…everything they are doing is making everything worse and their only answer is to keep doing more and maybe it’ll eventually change? That’s the definition of insanity.”
A man standing next to me, John Hartley, summed it up perfectly.
“I would just say the city doesn’t care. They don’t care to care, and they don’t listen.”
Here's something you might be interested in.
University Heights neighbors steaming over eight-story newbie
'They are rubber stamping everything'
University Heights neighbors steaming over eight-story newbie
'They are rubber stamping everything'
The lot is nestled between a two-story apartment building and a classic Craftsman home.
Several dozen community members gathered in front of 4350 Cleveland Avenue (at Meade) in University Heights on Saturday April 15, to protest the pending 49-unit, eight-story “affordable housing” building slated for construction on the quiet residential street.
The lot is nestled between a two-story apartment building and a classic Craftsman home in this historic neighborhood.
“They haven’t told us exactly how many affordable units there will be out of the 49 here, but from what I understand it will be two.”
“I’ve been here 25 years,” neighbor Phil told me. “It’s just a shock that any structure so large would be put into a residential section of a neighborhood.”
However, the problem presents larger than just the building itself, it’s about how the city is churning out these not really "affordable living" buildings in random areas, with little oversight, zero community input, and in this case, zero benefit to the community.
Marc Johnson and Kristin Harms co-chairs of the grassroots organization, We Are University Heights organized the protest and spoke to me about what’s going on.
Marc Johnson and Kristin Harms co-chairs of the grassroots organization, We Are University Heights organized the protest.
“The community stumbled upon the permits for the 8-story building – with limited parking – and we all said what the heck, this is not the location for that,” Johnson explained. “They haven’t told us exactly how many affordable units there will be out of the 49 here but from what I understand it will be two.”
Additionally, San Diego has a strong Mayor system of government many believe exacerbates the issue:
“With ministerial approval it means within the development services department they can just sign off, there is no debate, no public disclosure, and they are rubber stamping everything,” Johnson said. “They’re planning to put about 40 to 50 more of these around University Heights and North Park.”
Johnson estimates more than 5,000 new residents will be coming into the area within the next few years and adding up all the projects on the horizon, the infrastructure is not there.
“We agree the housing crisis is 100 percent real in San Diego, but this is not going to solve that problem…our group is proposing several solutions-we are not opposed to affordable housing…we are not NIMBYS, we are saying yes in my backyard, in the right location, we want smart, targeted density,” Johnson added.
"These are luxury townhomes, they are not going to be affordable."
Bill Ellig who was a member of Uptown Planners for five years agrees:
“We were very much involved in the 2016 Uptown plan,” Ellig said. “Right now, in other parts of the city, like the Talmage area, SDSU, UTC area – they are going through a community planning process and there’s a lot of discussion there. That is where the discussion should take place, that’s where the planning should go in – not with these municipal code changes, Complete Communities, Complete Communities 2 and the rest of them which override our community plan. Things need to be planned, there’s a right place for it and a wrong place for it.
"We’re not saying oh no not here, there are probably a hundred units or more on this block because there are a lot of them behind that people don’t see, there’s a lot of natural infill, so, we need proper placement, proper transitions between the higher density and the lower density. At Meade & Park boulevard we have eight stories, right across the street a single-story family house, that is bad planning. The Complete Community Plan even says they have to have proper transitions…this is not rocket science, I’m sorry, but here we have outside investors who don’t live here that are buying up the properties.”
“I haven’t seen the report,” Johnson said. “And now there is talk about other programs being launched by the mayor and the Development Services Department, all of this stuff is moving ahead with no oversight because we have a mayor who is C.E.O. of the city....
We’re talking about possibly having a strong mayor referendum in 2024, there are people starting that groundwork. And we are recommending that the city stop the Complete Communities program, just stop it right here because it’s going to ruin our communities.”
“We want to see our community planners be empowered again to see the projects so that we can all go there and see what the developers propose, that’s how it used to work, we don’t get that anymore,” Harms stated.
In 2011, the planning department and development services were combined. “They do not belong together,” she continues. “Planning is about planning, about the community plan, about community input. Development services is about building – it’s about allowing stuff like this to go in, they do not belong together, they need to be split up.”
View of 4350 Cleveland from across the street
“None of this conversation is about whether we should be building, it's strictly about where should that housing go – and that’s the point we’re trying to get out.” Attendee resident Jeff explained: “It’s a fantastic opportunity to sort of reshape how we do planning and create community…the strong mayor system, we voted for it, we said okay let’s make the strong mayor system but it has turned out to be the autocratic system, we never thought the strong mayor system meant a weak council system. “
One woman who marched alongside Todd Gloria, feels he betrayed his climate action plan. “This is not protecting our environment. I marched with Todd Gloria some years ago for the Climate Action Plan and I thought he was a good guy, he was gonna help with climate and diversity. This is not going to provide diversity in our neighborhoods, these are luxury townhomes, they are not going to be affordable. I heard one politician say these townhomes are going to provide housing for the homeless, can you tell me what homeless person is going to be able to afford, at the least, $3,000 a month for housing? So, when it comes to climate change – this adds more density, more traffic…and this lovely Craftsman two-story home, what about their back yard, what if they’re growing their vegetables? What if they have solar panels? There is so much wrong with this, it betrays the Climate Action Plan that I believed in. Todd Gloria has betrayed us.”
“There isn’t any other tool in the box our politicians pull out except getting rid of regulations and allowing whatever’s happening,” Bill told me. “It’s absolutely crickets when you ask them what about rent control or a vacancy tax for units that are kept off the market. Crickets. And the problem is just getting worse…everything they are doing is making everything worse and their only answer is to keep doing more and maybe it’ll eventually change? That’s the definition of insanity.”
A man standing next to me, John Hartley, summed it up perfectly.
“I would just say the city doesn’t care. They don’t care to care, and they don’t listen.”
Comments