Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
San Diego planning groups wary of reforms
Mission Beach, Encanto volunteers worry about membership rules, developer oversight
"The elimination of fee-exempt appeals will effectively silence the groups."
A series of reforms to community planning groups the San Diego City Council will make on Tuesday could be good for housing and diversity, bringing more balance to decisions about what gets built where.
But some say the proposal, if not amended, will silence less affluent neighborhoods. The city's 42 citizen planning groups provide information and opinions on new development projects and land use decisions, and their recommendations are a key part of the planning process.
They will still play that role, but the ability to quash projects in the midst of a shortage of affordable housing will be dimmed, some say. A rotation of new voices will refresh "what has become a stale and often ignored process," one comment reads.
The amendments have been in the works since a 2018 county grand jury report and city audit found planning groups to be unprofessional and lacking transparency, problems made worse by the city’s limited oversight.
Under the reform effort led by councilmember Joe LaCava, planning groups will become independent advisory bodies to the city, taking on their own recordkeeping, websites and other tasks long handled by city staff.
The update retains the 500 community volunteers who now serve and secures the autonomy of the groups to run their own annual elections to elect new voting members.
There will be a requirement to consider designating seats for renters, stakeholders and business representatives to ensure voting members reflect the broader community.
And each group will now have to collect demographic data of existing and new voting members and the community to submit to the city in its annual report.
Throughout the review process leading up to Tuesday's meeting, several community planning groups have voiced opposition, from financial burdens to allowing developers to avoid presenting their plans to the groups if they choose not to involve them in the review.
Many of their concerns remain unresolved, said a letter from Debbie Watkins, chair of the Mission Beach Precise Planning Board.
Staff documents state that the “city will endeavor to notify [community planning groups] of discretionary permits or actions located within their area.” But Watkins said it doesn't say what can be done if a planning group asks a developer to present their plans at a meeting and the developer declines.
Derryl Williams, chair of Groundwork San Diego - Chollas Creek Board of Directors, asked the city to postpone the item. Groundwork, a non-profit based in Encanto, works with planning groups in the Chollas Creek Watershed, where they have been restoring the creek, adding trails and other community features used by neighbors.
He criticized the imposition of a two-year gap before termed-out members can seek election, which makes it harder to recruit members; dropping the requirement that individuals seeking election attend three previous meetings - a minimum threshold to discourage favoring special interests, he said; and above all, taking away fee-free appeals.
Until now, the typical $1,000 appeal fee has always been waived for appeals filed by planning groups.
"The elimination of fee-exempt appeals for CPGs will effectively silence the groups," especially in low income communities, Williams said, since planning groups aren't allowed to charge fees to fund appeals or collect membership fees for operating expenses.
The city has pledged ongoing support, such as a $500 stipend to each planning group in fiscal year 2023. In addition, meeting space will be available without charge at city facilities, on a case-by-case basis, and the city will post the groups' agendas on their website.
Williams said it's not nearly enough to fund the needed data management systems, online meeting and translation services and website support.
"To continue improvements in our communities of concern, the [groups] need the city's support, rather than being penalized."
Here's something you might be interested in.
San Diego planning groups wary of reforms
Mission Beach, Encanto volunteers worry about membership rules, developer oversight
San Diego planning groups wary of reforms
Mission Beach, Encanto volunteers worry about membership rules, developer oversight
"The elimination of fee-exempt appeals will effectively silence the groups."
A series of reforms to community planning groups the San Diego City Council will make on Tuesday could be good for housing and diversity, bringing more balance to decisions about what gets built where.
But some say the proposal, if not amended, will silence less affluent neighborhoods. The city's 42 citizen planning groups provide information and opinions on new development projects and land use decisions, and their recommendations are a key part of the planning process.
They will still play that role, but the ability to quash projects in the midst of a shortage of affordable housing will be dimmed, some say. A rotation of new voices will refresh "what has become a stale and often ignored process," one comment reads.
The amendments have been in the works since a 2018 county grand jury report and city audit found planning groups to be unprofessional and lacking transparency, problems made worse by the city’s limited oversight.
Under the reform effort led by councilmember Joe LaCava, planning groups will become independent advisory bodies to the city, taking on their own recordkeeping, websites and other tasks long handled by city staff.
The update retains the 500 community volunteers who now serve and secures the autonomy of the groups to run their own annual elections to elect new voting members.
There will be a requirement to consider designating seats for renters, stakeholders and business representatives to ensure voting members reflect the broader community.
And each group will now have to collect demographic data of existing and new voting members and the community to submit to the city in its annual report.
Throughout the review process leading up to Tuesday's meeting, several community planning groups have voiced opposition, from financial burdens to allowing developers to avoid presenting their plans to the groups if they choose not to involve them in the review.
Many of their concerns remain unresolved, said a letter from Debbie Watkins, chair of the Mission Beach Precise Planning Board.
Staff documents state that the “city will endeavor to notify [community planning groups] of discretionary permits or actions located within their area.” But Watkins said it doesn't say what can be done if a planning group asks a developer to present their plans at a meeting and the developer declines.
Derryl Williams, chair of Groundwork San Diego - Chollas Creek Board of Directors, asked the city to postpone the item. Groundwork, a non-profit based in Encanto, works with planning groups in the Chollas Creek Watershed, where they have been restoring the creek, adding trails and other community features used by neighbors.
He criticized the imposition of a two-year gap before termed-out members can seek election, which makes it harder to recruit members; dropping the requirement that individuals seeking election attend three previous meetings - a minimum threshold to discourage favoring special interests, he said; and above all, taking away fee-free appeals.
Until now, the typical $1,000 appeal fee has always been waived for appeals filed by planning groups.
"The elimination of fee-exempt appeals for CPGs will effectively silence the groups," especially in low income communities, Williams said, since planning groups aren't allowed to charge fees to fund appeals or collect membership fees for operating expenses.
The city has pledged ongoing support, such as a $500 stipend to each planning group in fiscal year 2023. In addition, meeting space will be available without charge at city facilities, on a case-by-case basis, and the city will post the groups' agendas on their website.
Williams said it's not nearly enough to fund the needed data management systems, online meeting and translation services and website support.
"To continue improvements in our communities of concern, the [groups] need the city's support, rather than being penalized."
Commentsanam
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
Sept. 14, 2022