Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
How to control suspects in the wake of George Floyd
Union-Tribune hunting for new border reporter
![“This [Vascular Neck Restraint] technique is derived from martial arts holds and is distinctly different from ‘choke holds’ [shown above] and other forms of neck compression or manipulation, which can restrict breathing or injure airway structures. A properly performed VNR does not apply pressure to the anterior neck, airway, or trachea and does not impair respiration.”](https://media.sandiegoreader.com/img/photos/2022/11/07/RADAR_Army_Combatives_RNC_wikpedia_t670.jpg?b3f6a5d7692ccc373d56e40cf708e3fa67d9af9d)
“This [Vascular Neck Restraint] technique is derived from martial arts holds and is distinctly different from ‘choke holds’ [shown above] and other forms of neck compression or manipulation, which can restrict breathing or injure airway structures. A properly performed VNR does not apply pressure to the anterior neck, airway, or trachea and does not impair respiration.”
Arterial Restraint
A paper from Wake Forest University’s Medical School, employing data on so-called Vascular Neck Restraint application by the San Diego Police Department, the North Carolina State Highway Patrol, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, argues that the controversial technique, despite its critics, is good to go. Gary M. Vilke, UCSD professor of emergency medicine, is listed as a co-author of the study.
UCSD’s Gary Vilke joined Mounties in neck restraint work
“By banning [Vascular Neck Restraint], law enforcement officers have fewer options when taking a person into custody,” William P. Bozeman, M.D., professor of emergency medicine at the university, is quoted as saying in a November 2 university news release. “VNR is one of the least injurious tools that police have. And we now have evidence, for the first time, that it’s both safe and effective.”
Per Bozeman’s conclusions, published in the Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine: “This technique applies pressure to the lateral neck vasculature and — if properly applied — may quickly produce either voluntary subject compliance or temporary unconsciousness.” Adds the study, “This technique is derived from martial arts holds and is distinctly different from ‘choke holds’ and other forms of neck compression or manipulation, which can restrict breathing or injure airway structures. A properly performed VNR does not apply pressure to the anterior neck, airway, or trachea and does not impair respiration.”
The difference between so-called chokeholds and vascular restraint has been the subject of past San Diego controversies. In October 2018, then-police chief David Nisleit promised to provide medical exams for those subjected to use of “carotid restraint” by the department, according to an October 28, 2018 Union-Tribune account, noting that chokeholds were already banned. “The chief explained that the key difference between the two neck restraints has to do with where pressure is applied. A chokehold puts pressure on the front of the neck and throat, cutting off air, while a carotid restraint targets the vascular veins on the side of the neck and cuts off blood to render someone unconscious ‘very, very quickly,’ Nisleit said.”
But the January 1992 death of 16-year-old John Hampton after an SDPD carotid hold had already prompted San Diego to limit the practice. “Although the carotid hold will not be abandoned, its use will be restricted to occasions in which a violent suspect must be rendered unconscious,” the Los Angeles Times reported on August 18, 1992. “Even then, it cannot be applied for longer than 30 seconds and should be used with at least two officers present.” Complained then-chief of police Bob Burgreen:
““Let’s be real, if you take that tool away, what does an officer have left? Would you rather be rendered unconscious...or have an officer come at you with a (baton) and beat you until your bones break? In a real-world situation, those are the options and those are the only options.”
David Nisleit says cut blood supply not air
Critics of the practice, including Alara Chilton, then-immediate past president of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, remained unplacated. “The challenge is that when a person is met with this kind of (restraint), that person becomes (too) difficult to (have it) applied safely,” Chilton was quoted by the U-T as saying in 2018. “It is our position that you cannot apply it safely, because that person would be moving, and it would be verydifficult to reach the appropriate artery to safely cut off the circulation.” Chilton added that there had been “a lot of trauma and injury that results when this technique is applied.” Carotid restraints were finally banned altogether by then-San Diego mayor Kevin Faulconer following the May 25, 2020, death of George Floyd in custody of Minneapolis police. “We are watching the hurt and pain so many people are expressing after the tragic death of George Floyd,” said the mayor’s statement, as reported by a June 1, 2020, U-T dispatch, “and are committed to taking new actions to make sure something like this doesn’t happen in San Diego.”
Mexico bound
The San Diego Union-Tribune, which lost Wendy Fry, its star Mexico beat reporter, to an online upstart two weeks ago, is advertising for a replacement. “This reporter should be able to tackle stories that make a difference and hold accountable institutions and people in power, while carefully navigating a complex reporting environment,” says a job notice for a new border reporter on LinkedIn.com. The new hire, per the writeup, will also be “providing impactful enterprise stories and daily news reports, primarily in English, for prominent display in print and on digital platforms,” as well as “pitching in on some weekend/holiday metro reporting shifts.”
Meanwhile, according to another LinkedIn job posting, the paper is also looking for a sports department chief. “The Sports Editor supervises the sports reporters and columnists, edits and publishes their digital work, collaborates with visual journalists, and works closely with three section and quality editors who produce our print sections,” says the notice. The new chief of sports is expected to “develop a strategy to prioritize digital development, grow readership and digital subscriptions.”
— Matt Potter
The Reader offers $25 for news tips published in this column. Call our voice mail at 619-235-3000, ext. 440, or sandiegoreader.com/staff/matt-potter/contact/.
Here's something you might be interested in.
How to control suspects in the wake of George Floyd
Union-Tribune hunting for new border reporter
How to control suspects in the wake of George Floyd
Union-Tribune hunting for new border reporter
“This [Vascular Neck Restraint] technique is derived from martial arts holds and is distinctly different from ‘choke holds’ [shown above] and other forms of neck compression or manipulation, which can restrict breathing or injure airway structures. A properly performed VNR does not apply pressure to the anterior neck, airway, or trachea and does not impair respiration.”
Arterial Restraint
A paper from Wake Forest University’s Medical School, employing data on so-called Vascular Neck Restraint application by the San Diego Police Department, the North Carolina State Highway Patrol, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, argues that the controversial technique, despite its critics, is good to go. Gary M. Vilke, UCSD professor of emergency medicine, is listed as a co-author of the study.
UCSD’s Gary Vilke joined Mounties in neck restraint work
“By banning [Vascular Neck Restraint], law enforcement officers have fewer options when taking a person into custody,” William P. Bozeman, M.D., professor of emergency medicine at the university, is quoted as saying in a November 2 university news release. “VNR is one of the least injurious tools that police have. And we now have evidence, for the first time, that it’s both safe and effective.”
Per Bozeman’s conclusions, published in the Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine: “This technique applies pressure to the lateral neck vasculature and — if properly applied — may quickly produce either voluntary subject compliance or temporary unconsciousness.” Adds the study, “This technique is derived from martial arts holds and is distinctly different from ‘choke holds’ and other forms of neck compression or manipulation, which can restrict breathing or injure airway structures. A properly performed VNR does not apply pressure to the anterior neck, airway, or trachea and does not impair respiration.”
The difference between so-called chokeholds and vascular restraint has been the subject of past San Diego controversies. In October 2018, then-police chief David Nisleit promised to provide medical exams for those subjected to use of “carotid restraint” by the department, according to an October 28, 2018 Union-Tribune account, noting that chokeholds were already banned. “The chief explained that the key difference between the two neck restraints has to do with where pressure is applied. A chokehold puts pressure on the front of the neck and throat, cutting off air, while a carotid restraint targets the vascular veins on the side of the neck and cuts off blood to render someone unconscious ‘very, very quickly,’ Nisleit said.”
But the January 1992 death of 16-year-old John Hampton after an SDPD carotid hold had already prompted San Diego to limit the practice. “Although the carotid hold will not be abandoned, its use will be restricted to occasions in which a violent suspect must be rendered unconscious,” the Los Angeles Times reported on August 18, 1992. “Even then, it cannot be applied for longer than 30 seconds and should be used with at least two officers present.” Complained then-chief of police Bob Burgreen:
““Let’s be real, if you take that tool away, what does an officer have left? Would you rather be rendered unconscious...or have an officer come at you with a (baton) and beat you until your bones break? In a real-world situation, those are the options and those are the only options.”
David Nisleit says cut blood supply not air
Critics of the practice, including Alara Chilton, then-immediate past president of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, remained unplacated. “The challenge is that when a person is met with this kind of (restraint), that person becomes (too) difficult to (have it) applied safely,” Chilton was quoted by the U-T as saying in 2018. “It is our position that you cannot apply it safely, because that person would be moving, and it would be verydifficult to reach the appropriate artery to safely cut off the circulation.” Chilton added that there had been “a lot of trauma and injury that results when this technique is applied.” Carotid restraints were finally banned altogether by then-San Diego mayor Kevin Faulconer following the May 25, 2020, death of George Floyd in custody of Minneapolis police. “We are watching the hurt and pain so many people are expressing after the tragic death of George Floyd,” said the mayor’s statement, as reported by a June 1, 2020, U-T dispatch, “and are committed to taking new actions to make sure something like this doesn’t happen in San Diego.”
Mexico bound
The San Diego Union-Tribune, which lost Wendy Fry, its star Mexico beat reporter, to an online upstart two weeks ago, is advertising for a replacement. “This reporter should be able to tackle stories that make a difference and hold accountable institutions and people in power, while carefully navigating a complex reporting environment,” says a job notice for a new border reporter on LinkedIn.com. The new hire, per the writeup, will also be “providing impactful enterprise stories and daily news reports, primarily in English, for prominent display in print and on digital platforms,” as well as “pitching in on some weekend/holiday metro reporting shifts.”
Meanwhile, according to another LinkedIn job posting, the paper is also looking for a sports department chief. “The Sports Editor supervises the sports reporters and columnists, edits and publishes their digital work, collaborates with visual journalists, and works closely with three section and quality editors who produce our print sections,” says the notice. The new chief of sports is expected to “develop a strategy to prioritize digital development, grow readership and digital subscriptions.”
— Matt Potter
The Reader offers $25 for news tips published in this column. Call our voice mail at 619-235-3000, ext. 440, or sandiegoreader.com/staff/matt-potter/contact/.
Comments