Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
San Diego planners want dense housing near your bus stop
Mobility zones would stretch out to a 1 or 3/4 mile walkshed around transit hubs
The old half-mile access to transit as the crow flies is a crude measure.
Planners last week voted unanimously to recommend the city council approve most, but not all, of the changes to the 2022 land development code update. A few still had rough edges - especially the one that would reinvent transit priority areas.
Where these growth-worthy areas fall matters to a diverse group of neighbors, realtors, developers, and advocates for climate action, mobility and housing. And for once, they all agreed.
"There is so much opposition from a lot of really strange bedfellows we don't normally see in lockstep opposing something," said commissioner Boomhower, who made the motion to hold it back until December 8 for further evaluation.
No one seemed to know if it would increase or decrease housing.
Transit priority areas are defined as falling within one-half mile of an existing or planned major transit stop. The planning commission's proposal would replace them with “sustainable development areas" involving the same transit stops, but extending further, opening new areas to housing.
According to their research, the old half-mile access to transit as the crow flies is a crude measure. Using new data, they came up with mobility zones that would stretch it out to a 1 or 3/4 mile walkshed.
Sustainable Development Areas account for canyons, freeways and other natural barriers, allowing more housing opportunities near transit, they say. Also, city-specific incentive programs near transit will be continually expanded.
The changes will remove undevelopable land, parks and open space, as well as areas having low density, industrial uses and limited accessibility. Complete communities and the ADA bonus program were not included in the adequate sites inventory, staff said.
"It's got some phenomenal, game-changing potential," Boomhower said.
Critics also saw the potential for less housing and fewer jobs near transit along with the remapping of TPAs into new, and possibly smaller, geographic areas.
"The change would reduce the amount of developable acreage qualifying for what is presently called a TPA," said Melanie Cohn, director of regional policy and government affairs at Biocom California.
"We're especially concerned about this coming on the heels of the Blueline Trolley extension to UCSD and our life science hub, the largest transit investment in the region's history," she said.
"It could also impact the university plan update happening now, reducing the number of homes and jobs."
Climate Action Plan policy advocate Madison Coleman shared the same concern about shrinking developable acreage.
"Across the region there are a limited number of infill areas that have the opportunity to reduce vehicle miles," she said. "Few jurisdictions have as many opportunities to reduce driving through infill development as the city of San Diego."
She criticized the proposal for relying on walking alone to define the mobility zone, when people use bikes, scooters, and other modes.
Jessie O'Sullivan, policy coordinator for Circulate SD, said the changes could reduce the capacity to build homes on many city parcels. "With the housing shortage, we shouldn't be downzoning anywhere," he said.
"Until today no analysis has been made public as to whether this change would increase or decrease capacity for homes. It's still not clear to me."
Planning staff said the sustainable development area is meant to be dynamic. As more trails and bike paths come online, its boundaries will grow, bringing more areas within easy reach of transit.
Here's something you might be interested in.
San Diego planners want dense housing near your bus stop
Mobility zones would stretch out to a 1 or 3/4 mile walkshed around transit hubs
San Diego planners want dense housing near your bus stop
Mobility zones would stretch out to a 1 or 3/4 mile walkshed around transit hubs
The old half-mile access to transit as the crow flies is a crude measure.
Planners last week voted unanimously to recommend the city council approve most, but not all, of the changes to the 2022 land development code update. A few still had rough edges - especially the one that would reinvent transit priority areas.
Where these growth-worthy areas fall matters to a diverse group of neighbors, realtors, developers, and advocates for climate action, mobility and housing. And for once, they all agreed.
"There is so much opposition from a lot of really strange bedfellows we don't normally see in lockstep opposing something," said commissioner Boomhower, who made the motion to hold it back until December 8 for further evaluation.
No one seemed to know if it would increase or decrease housing.
Transit priority areas are defined as falling within one-half mile of an existing or planned major transit stop. The planning commission's proposal would replace them with “sustainable development areas" involving the same transit stops, but extending further, opening new areas to housing.
According to their research, the old half-mile access to transit as the crow flies is a crude measure. Using new data, they came up with mobility zones that would stretch it out to a 1 or 3/4 mile walkshed.
Sustainable Development Areas account for canyons, freeways and other natural barriers, allowing more housing opportunities near transit, they say. Also, city-specific incentive programs near transit will be continually expanded.
The changes will remove undevelopable land, parks and open space, as well as areas having low density, industrial uses and limited accessibility. Complete communities and the ADA bonus program were not included in the adequate sites inventory, staff said.
"It's got some phenomenal, game-changing potential," Boomhower said.
Critics also saw the potential for less housing and fewer jobs near transit along with the remapping of TPAs into new, and possibly smaller, geographic areas.
"The change would reduce the amount of developable acreage qualifying for what is presently called a TPA," said Melanie Cohn, director of regional policy and government affairs at Biocom California.
"We're especially concerned about this coming on the heels of the Blueline Trolley extension to UCSD and our life science hub, the largest transit investment in the region's history," she said.
"It could also impact the university plan update happening now, reducing the number of homes and jobs."
Climate Action Plan policy advocate Madison Coleman shared the same concern about shrinking developable acreage.
"Across the region there are a limited number of infill areas that have the opportunity to reduce vehicle miles," she said. "Few jurisdictions have as many opportunities to reduce driving through infill development as the city of San Diego."
She criticized the proposal for relying on walking alone to define the mobility zone, when people use bikes, scooters, and other modes.
Jessie O'Sullivan, policy coordinator for Circulate SD, said the changes could reduce the capacity to build homes on many city parcels. "With the housing shortage, we shouldn't be downzoning anywhere," he said.
"Until today no analysis has been made public as to whether this change would increase or decrease capacity for homes. It's still not clear to me."
Planning staff said the sustainable development area is meant to be dynamic. As more trails and bike paths come online, its boundaries will grow, bringing more areas within easy reach of transit.
Comments