Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Del Mar rejects four-foot bluff fence
Six-foot barrier along train tracks up next
The proposed safety barrier would run between 9th Street and the end of the Del Mar Woods condominiums.
A deadline to save public access to Del Mar's upper bluff has passed. On the last possible day to sign an agreement with the North County Transit District that would fend off a six-foot wire fence, the city voted 3-2 to reject the terms.
Had they approved the license agreement, a four-foot post and cable fence would have been placed instead. In exchange for public access, the city had to accept liability for use of the transit district's right-of-way and maintenance of the upper bluff trail, by February 28.
Some council members said they were okay with the agreement and assuming liability for any injuries. But they disagreed with a fence. Any fence.
The railroad has been fence-free since 1910, except at the end of 10th Street. The proposed safety barrier would run between 9th Street and the end of the Del Mar Woods condominiums, an area not known for train collisions with pedestrians.
"The upper bluff is so far removed from where accidents happen," said resident Camilla Rang, who lives nearby and envisions the narrow path being swallowed by a fence.
According to city manager Ashley Jones, the city, North County Transit District and the California Coastal Commission have been working on the agreement for more than a year. Revisions were made as late as yesterday, including changes made by the coastal commission, not all of which the transit district agreed with.
For one, the coastal commission said the license agreement doesn't change their pursuit of a full environmental review, which the district has never agreed to or considered necessary.
Several speakers warned of the hazards of drilling holes for fence posts every seven feet or so along the fragile bluff. The safety priority should be Coast Boulevard, said resident John Stahl.
In June 2020, the agency published a Trespasser Risk Reduction Study, which was the basis for the six-foot chain link fence proposal.
The study showed a concentration of trespasser incidents in the northern study area, "particularly at a curve in the track roughly between Coast Boulevard and 13th Street."
Later that summer, the transit district filed a petition with the federal Surface Transportation Board that sought to block the coastal commission and Del Mar from being able to regulate rail operations along the bluffs. The city, coastal commission, locals, and the Surfrider Foundation filed oppositions to the petition.
The district was open to a different size or type of fence, as long as the city paid for the surveys, design, construction and maintenance. The city would also have to assume total liability for the fencing and indemnify the transit district.
Concessions made since include fence posts no taller than 44 inches; the city only having to reimburse the agency for half the costs of fence maintenance rather than the 100 percent, and only being liable for incidents within the license area along the upper bluff.
In addition, the city would not have to enforce trespassing within the railroad right-of-way, and would be indemnified for train collisions in the license area.
"What happens if we don't sign this agreement?" asked councilmember Dave Druker - who, along with mayor Dwight Worden, voted to sign it. He pointed out that they still don't know what the Surface Transportation Board will do - or if the coastal commission can intervene. But one thing is known: "NCTD [North County Transit District] is going to put up a fence."
The agency owns the land.
"Basically, this is an insurance policy that preserves our ability not to have a six-foot fence along the bluff."
Here's something you might be interested in.
Del Mar rejects four-foot bluff fence
Six-foot barrier along train tracks up next
Del Mar rejects four-foot bluff fence
Six-foot barrier along train tracks up next
The proposed safety barrier would run between 9th Street and the end of the Del Mar Woods condominiums.
A deadline to save public access to Del Mar's upper bluff has passed. On the last possible day to sign an agreement with the North County Transit District that would fend off a six-foot wire fence, the city voted 3-2 to reject the terms.
Had they approved the license agreement, a four-foot post and cable fence would have been placed instead. In exchange for public access, the city had to accept liability for use of the transit district's right-of-way and maintenance of the upper bluff trail, by February 28.
Some council members said they were okay with the agreement and assuming liability for any injuries. But they disagreed with a fence. Any fence.
The railroad has been fence-free since 1910, except at the end of 10th Street. The proposed safety barrier would run between 9th Street and the end of the Del Mar Woods condominiums, an area not known for train collisions with pedestrians.
"The upper bluff is so far removed from where accidents happen," said resident Camilla Rang, who lives nearby and envisions the narrow path being swallowed by a fence.
According to city manager Ashley Jones, the city, North County Transit District and the California Coastal Commission have been working on the agreement for more than a year. Revisions were made as late as yesterday, including changes made by the coastal commission, not all of which the transit district agreed with.
For one, the coastal commission said the license agreement doesn't change their pursuit of a full environmental review, which the district has never agreed to or considered necessary.
Several speakers warned of the hazards of drilling holes for fence posts every seven feet or so along the fragile bluff. The safety priority should be Coast Boulevard, said resident John Stahl.
In June 2020, the agency published a Trespasser Risk Reduction Study, which was the basis for the six-foot chain link fence proposal.
The study showed a concentration of trespasser incidents in the northern study area, "particularly at a curve in the track roughly between Coast Boulevard and 13th Street."
Later that summer, the transit district filed a petition with the federal Surface Transportation Board that sought to block the coastal commission and Del Mar from being able to regulate rail operations along the bluffs. The city, coastal commission, locals, and the Surfrider Foundation filed oppositions to the petition.
The district was open to a different size or type of fence, as long as the city paid for the surveys, design, construction and maintenance. The city would also have to assume total liability for the fencing and indemnify the transit district.
Concessions made since include fence posts no taller than 44 inches; the city only having to reimburse the agency for half the costs of fence maintenance rather than the 100 percent, and only being liable for incidents within the license area along the upper bluff.
In addition, the city would not have to enforce trespassing within the railroad right-of-way, and would be indemnified for train collisions in the license area.
"What happens if we don't sign this agreement?" asked councilmember Dave Druker - who, along with mayor Dwight Worden, voted to sign it. He pointed out that they still don't know what the Surface Transportation Board will do - or if the coastal commission can intervene. But one thing is known: "NCTD [North County Transit District] is going to put up a fence."
The agency owns the land.
"Basically, this is an insurance policy that preserves our ability not to have a six-foot fence along the bluff."
Comments