Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Going full grammar-guy on public radio
You don’t listen KPBS. You listen to KPBS
KPBS: committing grammarcide daily!
Is it just me? Harken to KPBS: “Thank you for listening and supporting KPBS…” This is KPBS, member-supported radio, with assets of, what, $75 million? You do a double take. Say what? “Thank you for listening and supporting KPBS.” Aaargh! How could they!? How do you even translate this? “Thank you for listening KPBS”? You don’t listen KPBS. You listen to KPBS!
Yes, they could mean “Thank you for 1) listening to them thanking you; and 2) for supporting KPBS. But I don’t buy it. For brevity, they thought they could get away with murder by mashing two incompatible messages. I bet there have been a zillion announcers’ booth arguments on this one. And on the region’s most pretentious radio outlet!
KPBS: Keeping Grammarians guessing.
“Thank you for…” KPBS has been running this small but maddening grammatical outrage for months, years! (This is on top of announcers insisting on signing off as “K-pbs,” as though isolating the “K” delivers a message about ownership. I should call and record a righteously outraged message. I should also complain about the news reading crew consistently getting their stresses wrong. I should …I know. What thu heck. It really is no big deal. Just like someone playing a bum note once every verse in a song. Why complain? The rest of the song is fine. I’m just another curmudgeon going forensic on overstressed radio announcers. But as Eli Wallach says in Godfather Part III, there’s nothing more annoying than having a pebble in your shoe. “Thank you for listening…” is a pebble in my shoe. Will somebody talk to somebody?
Here's something you might be interested in.
Going full grammar-guy on public radio
You don’t listen KPBS. You listen to KPBS
Going full grammar-guy on public radio
You don’t listen KPBS. You listen to KPBS
KPBS: committing grammarcide daily!
Is it just me? Harken to KPBS: “Thank you for listening and supporting KPBS…” This is KPBS, member-supported radio, with assets of, what, $75 million? You do a double take. Say what? “Thank you for listening and supporting KPBS.” Aaargh! How could they!? How do you even translate this? “Thank you for listening KPBS”? You don’t listen KPBS. You listen to KPBS!
Yes, they could mean “Thank you for 1) listening to them thanking you; and 2) for supporting KPBS. But I don’t buy it. For brevity, they thought they could get away with murder by mashing two incompatible messages. I bet there have been a zillion announcers’ booth arguments on this one. And on the region’s most pretentious radio outlet!
KPBS: Keeping Grammarians guessing.
“Thank you for…” KPBS has been running this small but maddening grammatical outrage for months, years! (This is on top of announcers insisting on signing off as “K-pbs,” as though isolating the “K” delivers a message about ownership. I should call and record a righteously outraged message. I should also complain about the news reading crew consistently getting their stresses wrong. I should …I know. What thu heck. It really is no big deal. Just like someone playing a bum note once every verse in a song. Why complain? The rest of the song is fine. I’m just another curmudgeon going forensic on overstressed radio announcers. But as Eli Wallach says in Godfather Part III, there’s nothing more annoying than having a pebble in your shoe. “Thank you for listening…” is a pebble in my shoe. Will somebody talk to somebody?
Comments