Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Hello granny flats, adios trees
City rule is now to add one 24-inch box tree
Existing tree canopy around Balboa Park area in green); possible tree canopy in yellow
San Diegans want more trees. That was made clear in surveys for the climate action plan update, but tree advocates say the urban canopy is stuck in time.
Under the 2015 climate action plan, a goal of 15 percent coverage by 2020 fell short; today trees cover 13 percent of the city.
Amid losses to development, pests, and disease, the city has removed as many trees as it planted in the past two years, according to Anne Fege, chair of the community forest advisory board.
That's where private property owners come in. The city's website notes that an urban forest "is an entire ecosystem that includes trees on both public and private property."
Advocates say homes and businesses offer ground to expand the urban canopy, and owners are likely to care for the trees, while the city's budget for street tree maintenance languishes.
Tree fans worry it will be a missed opportunity. In many new developments, including those with backyard granny flats, mature shade trees are being removed and not replaced. San Diego lacks a policy to mitigate their loss.
San Diego tree coverage by city council district
"We need to be honest about tree losses during urban infill projects, as large trees are often removed and narrow setbacks leave little or no room for trees," Fege commented.
Permits for development on private land are approved by the development services department, which oversees permitting for both planting and removal of trees under the city’s jurisdiction.
Noting that San Diego is caught between a housing crisis and a climate emergency, City Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera has called for changes to the granny flat ordinance, approved in October 2020, and trees are part of it.
The ordinance is meant to comply with state law and encourage property owners to build more granny flats to house more renters. And they are. The number of units permitted for construction rose from 32 in 2017 to 627 in 2019.
In 2020, 493 of these backyard units were permitted, according to the City of San Diego's Annual Housing Inventory Report.
The city's ordinance has a meager landscaping requirement for new companion units, to be planted in the front yard or abutting parkway: one 24-inch box tree.
"It is important that we mitigate the loss of mature shade trees" removed to make way for a granny flat, Elo-Rivera said.
"I propose that any development of [a granny flat] that removes a mature shade tree is required to replace each tree," within the parkway next to the property or the community planning area where it's built.
During public comment on the climate action plan update, others accused developers of swooping in and taking advantage of the accessory dwelling unit ordinance - to the detriment of the urban canopy.
It's happening right now at properties in Talmadge and soon, in Clairemont, said Paul Krueger, asking that the city "amend its regulations that allow developers to clear cut existing lots and not replace a single tree."
Here's something you might be interested in.
Hello granny flats, adios trees
City rule is now to add one 24-inch box tree
Hello granny flats, adios trees
City rule is now to add one 24-inch box tree
Existing tree canopy around Balboa Park area in green); possible tree canopy in yellow
San Diegans want more trees. That was made clear in surveys for the climate action plan update, but tree advocates say the urban canopy is stuck in time.
Under the 2015 climate action plan, a goal of 15 percent coverage by 2020 fell short; today trees cover 13 percent of the city.
Amid losses to development, pests, and disease, the city has removed as many trees as it planted in the past two years, according to Anne Fege, chair of the community forest advisory board.
That's where private property owners come in. The city's website notes that an urban forest "is an entire ecosystem that includes trees on both public and private property."
Advocates say homes and businesses offer ground to expand the urban canopy, and owners are likely to care for the trees, while the city's budget for street tree maintenance languishes.
Tree fans worry it will be a missed opportunity. In many new developments, including those with backyard granny flats, mature shade trees are being removed and not replaced. San Diego lacks a policy to mitigate their loss.
San Diego tree coverage by city council district
"We need to be honest about tree losses during urban infill projects, as large trees are often removed and narrow setbacks leave little or no room for trees," Fege commented.
Permits for development on private land are approved by the development services department, which oversees permitting for both planting and removal of trees under the city’s jurisdiction.
Noting that San Diego is caught between a housing crisis and a climate emergency, City Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera has called for changes to the granny flat ordinance, approved in October 2020, and trees are part of it.
The ordinance is meant to comply with state law and encourage property owners to build more granny flats to house more renters. And they are. The number of units permitted for construction rose from 32 in 2017 to 627 in 2019.
In 2020, 493 of these backyard units were permitted, according to the City of San Diego's Annual Housing Inventory Report.
The city's ordinance has a meager landscaping requirement for new companion units, to be planted in the front yard or abutting parkway: one 24-inch box tree.
"It is important that we mitigate the loss of mature shade trees" removed to make way for a granny flat, Elo-Rivera said.
"I propose that any development of [a granny flat] that removes a mature shade tree is required to replace each tree," within the parkway next to the property or the community planning area where it's built.
During public comment on the climate action plan update, others accused developers of swooping in and taking advantage of the accessory dwelling unit ordinance - to the detriment of the urban canopy.
It's happening right now at properties in Talmadge and soon, in Clairemont, said Paul Krueger, asking that the city "amend its regulations that allow developers to clear cut existing lots and not replace a single tree."
Comments