Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Forget trees to help San Diego carbon emissions
Easier to re-forest Cuyamaca State Park
From the report criticizing cap-and-trade offsets (Appendix U3)
Every city in the county needs more trees. San Diego alone must triple its canopy to meet climate plan goals, which rely on trees as if they were banks, soaking up carbon in the air and safely stashing it away for years.
At least 100 years, to meet the California Air Resource Board's definition of permanence of carbon sequestration.
Under the state's key climate law, cap-and-trade, there are a few ways polluters can offset their carbon emissions, and the most utilized are forest offsets. But local urban forests? Never.
Trees may sponge up roadside auto emissions, but these locally sourced carbon credits haven't come to any San Diego streets or in the parks, cemeteries, golf courses and myriad other places the board allows.
In fact, an ongoing lawsuit accuses the county of offshoring its carbon offsets. Letting developers buy pollution reduction credits in other counties, where San Diego air quality won't benefit. In recent years, supervisors approved a batch of sprawl-style projects that allowed emissions reductions offsets to be fulfilled outside the county.
Sierra Club attorney Josh Chatten-Brown said there is plenty of county land, including the port, where offset projects can be created. For now, the county can't count a single one.
But in 2021, California will require half of the emissions reductions from offsets to be local.
Cities like Austin have turned to a Seattle-based non-profit, City Forest Credits, to boost their canopies with offsets. Urban forests require different protocols than industrial tracts. Tree projects earn certified carbon credits through protocols for planting or preservation that detail everything from locations to how carbon is quantified.
Air quality benefits, rainfall interception, and energy savings from cooling and heating effects are all in the mix. While the group maintains the protocols, other organizations sell them and verify project compliance.
Critics of cap-and-trade say offsets can't be fully accounted for, that emissions reductions are often exaggerated or inaccurate. Supporters of urban forest credits say local offsets can be better regulated.
A report that evaluated the county's potential carbon offsets found that the California Air Resources Board has protocols, but the only viable ones for the area are U.S. forest or livestock projects. And the current greenhouse gas offset demand exceeds the supply, leaving the need for offsets from outside the county.
Even though the board has had an urban forest offset protocol since 2011, "not a single urban forestry offset project—in state or out—has been developed."
Here's something you might be interested in.
Forget trees to help San Diego carbon emissions
Easier to re-forest Cuyamaca State Park
Forget trees to help San Diego carbon emissions
Easier to re-forest Cuyamaca State Park
From the report criticizing cap-and-trade offsets (Appendix U3)
Every city in the county needs more trees. San Diego alone must triple its canopy to meet climate plan goals, which rely on trees as if they were banks, soaking up carbon in the air and safely stashing it away for years.
At least 100 years, to meet the California Air Resource Board's definition of permanence of carbon sequestration.
Under the state's key climate law, cap-and-trade, there are a few ways polluters can offset their carbon emissions, and the most utilized are forest offsets. But local urban forests? Never.
Trees may sponge up roadside auto emissions, but these locally sourced carbon credits haven't come to any San Diego streets or in the parks, cemeteries, golf courses and myriad other places the board allows.
In fact, an ongoing lawsuit accuses the county of offshoring its carbon offsets. Letting developers buy pollution reduction credits in other counties, where San Diego air quality won't benefit. In recent years, supervisors approved a batch of sprawl-style projects that allowed emissions reductions offsets to be fulfilled outside the county.
Sierra Club attorney Josh Chatten-Brown said there is plenty of county land, including the port, where offset projects can be created. For now, the county can't count a single one.
But in 2021, California will require half of the emissions reductions from offsets to be local.
Cities like Austin have turned to a Seattle-based non-profit, City Forest Credits, to boost their canopies with offsets. Urban forests require different protocols than industrial tracts. Tree projects earn certified carbon credits through protocols for planting or preservation that detail everything from locations to how carbon is quantified.
Air quality benefits, rainfall interception, and energy savings from cooling and heating effects are all in the mix. While the group maintains the protocols, other organizations sell them and verify project compliance.
Critics of cap-and-trade say offsets can't be fully accounted for, that emissions reductions are often exaggerated or inaccurate. Supporters of urban forest credits say local offsets can be better regulated.
A report that evaluated the county's potential carbon offsets found that the California Air Resources Board has protocols, but the only viable ones for the area are U.S. forest or livestock projects. And the current greenhouse gas offset demand exceeds the supply, leaving the need for offsets from outside the county.
Even though the board has had an urban forest offset protocol since 2011, "not a single urban forestry offset project—in state or out—has been developed."
Commentsdrpaulsbythesea
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
Feb. 14, 2020
jalantuhan56
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
March 7, 2020