Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
UCSD cancer center blasted for trip, meal, and event spending
"Payment of travel costs for a caterer does not appear to be prudent on its face"
UCSD's Moores Cancer Center
As COVID-19 continues to ravage the world, officials at UCSD's Moores Cancer Center are no longer spending heavily on global travel and entertainment, at least for the time being. But just months before the pandemic hit, the center was called out by university auditors for mismanagement of the state institution's official travel and amenity money by unidentified executives, including "a recently hired administrator."
"The objective of our review was to determine whether selected [Moores Cancer Center] travel and entertainment expenditures were processed in compliance with policy, fund source restrictions, and budgetary requirements," says a December 5 report subsequently posted online by the University of California's Audit & Management Advisory Services unit.
"A trip by the Administrator to an international conference included additional days at another international location, some of which may have been personal, which were not explained in the documentation," according to the document.
"Other events indicated that the Administrator traveled a day early, without explanation of the business justification, and an airport meal which may have been unallowable per policy. Other minor arithmetic errors were noted."
In addition, "a duplicate reimbursement was made to the Administrator for one travel event totaling $1,040."
According to the audit, "the Administrator had not realized the discrepancy as she was under the impression that another travel event had been processed and the overall reimbursement amount for her events was close to her estimated reimbursement."
"Another travel event for the Administrator related to mileage for the Administrator’s commute from her home (outside of San Diego) to UCSD, after she was hired but prior to her relocation to San Diego," says the report. "While the Administrator received relocation assistance as part of her offer letter, it did not specifically address commuting for this time period. "
In addition to those discrepancies, the document goes on to say that auditors found "two instances where the same group of employees were provided with meals more often than once per month. Also, itemized receipts were not always submitted for expenses of $75 or more."
"We also noted that business meetings were often held in local restaurants, which can provide the appearance that a University business objective was not the sole purpose of the meeting. "
The meals were not consistent with university guidance, according to the report, which "states that business meetings between UCSD employees typically are held on UCSD property rather than in restaurants. Policy also sets limits on the frequency for providing meals to employees so that this is not considered a taxable benefit (meals should be limited to no more than once a month or twelve times per year, per group)."
A catered event held a year earlier held in association with what the report calls a Cancer Center Support Grant Site Visit caught the auditors' attention.
"In addition to the Site Visit held in October 2018, an External Advisory Board Meeting was held in September 2018 to serve as a 'Mock' Site Visit," according to the document.
Combined expenses for both, including Event Production costs of $119,274; Event Planning & Management services; $33,456; Caterer, $28,146; Branding/Graphic design, $19,361; and Florist, $14,772, totaled $235,818.
"Certain aspects of these expenditures might raise question of whether the expenditure was the 'best use of University-administered funds' as indicated in policy. For example, the Caterer was based on the Los Angeles area, and the invoice included $4,208 in travel, hotel, and per diem costs for catering staff. "
"Payment of travel costs for a caterer does not appear to be prudent on its face, and the cost of production services appeared to account for over half of the expenses for this event (including a “rehearsal” at the [External Advisory Board] Mock Site Visit). While this may appear to be a high dollar figure, MCC leadership indicated that the business need for success at the event was high to secure future grant funding."
Interviews with cancer center staffers "indicated that there was some dissatisfaction with the local caterer at the Mock Site Visit, which prompted a last-minute change to another vendor which had been used by the Event Planner in the past, and had delivered high quality services on prior occasions "
The interviews revealed that "event preparations evolved significantly in the several weeks leading up to the event, and logistical and other considerations resulted in escalating costs."
A December 5 memo from the university's Audit & Management interim director Christa Perkins attached to the document says that "because we were able to reach agreement regarding Management Action Plans in response to the audit recommendations, a formal response to the report is not requested."
As a result, the report says, the university received a refund for the unnamed administrator's duplicate reimbursement and the cancer center "agreed to develop budgetary guidelines for future significant events with estimated costs above a defined threshold and ensure management accountability for adherence to established budgets."
Here's something you might be interested in.
UCSD cancer center blasted for trip, meal, and event spending
"Payment of travel costs for a caterer does not appear to be prudent on its face"
UCSD cancer center blasted for trip, meal, and event spending
"Payment of travel costs for a caterer does not appear to be prudent on its face"
UCSD's Moores Cancer Center
As COVID-19 continues to ravage the world, officials at UCSD's Moores Cancer Center are no longer spending heavily on global travel and entertainment, at least for the time being. But just months before the pandemic hit, the center was called out by university auditors for mismanagement of the state institution's official travel and amenity money by unidentified executives, including "a recently hired administrator."
"The objective of our review was to determine whether selected [Moores Cancer Center] travel and entertainment expenditures were processed in compliance with policy, fund source restrictions, and budgetary requirements," says a December 5 report subsequently posted online by the University of California's Audit & Management Advisory Services unit.
"A trip by the Administrator to an international conference included additional days at another international location, some of which may have been personal, which were not explained in the documentation," according to the document.
"Other events indicated that the Administrator traveled a day early, without explanation of the business justification, and an airport meal which may have been unallowable per policy. Other minor arithmetic errors were noted."
In addition, "a duplicate reimbursement was made to the Administrator for one travel event totaling $1,040."
According to the audit, "the Administrator had not realized the discrepancy as she was under the impression that another travel event had been processed and the overall reimbursement amount for her events was close to her estimated reimbursement."
"Another travel event for the Administrator related to mileage for the Administrator’s commute from her home (outside of San Diego) to UCSD, after she was hired but prior to her relocation to San Diego," says the report. "While the Administrator received relocation assistance as part of her offer letter, it did not specifically address commuting for this time period. "
In addition to those discrepancies, the document goes on to say that auditors found "two instances where the same group of employees were provided with meals more often than once per month. Also, itemized receipts were not always submitted for expenses of $75 or more."
"We also noted that business meetings were often held in local restaurants, which can provide the appearance that a University business objective was not the sole purpose of the meeting. "
The meals were not consistent with university guidance, according to the report, which "states that business meetings between UCSD employees typically are held on UCSD property rather than in restaurants. Policy also sets limits on the frequency for providing meals to employees so that this is not considered a taxable benefit (meals should be limited to no more than once a month or twelve times per year, per group)."
A catered event held a year earlier held in association with what the report calls a Cancer Center Support Grant Site Visit caught the auditors' attention.
"In addition to the Site Visit held in October 2018, an External Advisory Board Meeting was held in September 2018 to serve as a 'Mock' Site Visit," according to the document.
Combined expenses for both, including Event Production costs of $119,274; Event Planning & Management services; $33,456; Caterer, $28,146; Branding/Graphic design, $19,361; and Florist, $14,772, totaled $235,818.
"Certain aspects of these expenditures might raise question of whether the expenditure was the 'best use of University-administered funds' as indicated in policy. For example, the Caterer was based on the Los Angeles area, and the invoice included $4,208 in travel, hotel, and per diem costs for catering staff. "
"Payment of travel costs for a caterer does not appear to be prudent on its face, and the cost of production services appeared to account for over half of the expenses for this event (including a “rehearsal” at the [External Advisory Board] Mock Site Visit). While this may appear to be a high dollar figure, MCC leadership indicated that the business need for success at the event was high to secure future grant funding."
Interviews with cancer center staffers "indicated that there was some dissatisfaction with the local caterer at the Mock Site Visit, which prompted a last-minute change to another vendor which had been used by the Event Planner in the past, and had delivered high quality services on prior occasions "
The interviews revealed that "event preparations evolved significantly in the several weeks leading up to the event, and logistical and other considerations resulted in escalating costs."
A December 5 memo from the university's Audit & Management interim director Christa Perkins attached to the document says that "because we were able to reach agreement regarding Management Action Plans in response to the audit recommendations, a formal response to the report is not requested."
As a result, the report says, the university received a refund for the unnamed administrator's duplicate reimbursement and the cancer center "agreed to develop budgetary guidelines for future significant events with estimated costs above a defined threshold and ensure management accountability for adherence to established budgets."
Commentsemilysdoucette
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
April 30, 2020
charissejlavin2
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
May 2, 2020
louisemunderwood
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
May 9, 2020
hildegardrdungan
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
May 11, 2020