Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
No new North County sprawl has its consequences
Now you will have to drive down from Riverside
Newland Communities plan for 2135 homes in Merriam Mountains put on hold by Sierra Club suit.
Where are the high paying jobs cropping up in San Diego? North County. And where are many of the big sprawl housing projects proposed? North County.
The "two simple numbers" that really count in that equation, Erik Bruvold told county supervisors at the October 30 board meeting, are eight and one.
"Since the end of the great recession, for every eight net jobs we've added in North County, we've built one home."
So Bruvold, CEO of the San Diego North Economic Development Council, and Gary London, a real estate land-use economist with London Moeder Advisors, who spoke, are fighting a March 2020 ballot initiative that resists those developments.
Safeguard Our San Diego Countryside would require countywide voter approval for general plan amendments that increase density in semi-rural and rural areas by five or more dwelling units.
Swirling at the center of the debate about where to put housing is a cloud of carbon. With the county's nod, developers of projects like Newland Sierra and Lilac Hills, both outside Escondido, planned to mitigate greenhouse gases stemming from the increased traffic by buying carbon offsets outside the county. Planting trees, say, in another country. Which does nothing to reduce local emissions, the whole point of the county's climate action plan.
The Sierra Club sued the county, alleging that the plan failed to protect the region from greenhouse gas emissions from new development, and won. Last December, a judge halted Newland Sierra, Warner Ranch and Lilac Hills over this flaw in the approval process that lets developers "pay to pollute" as critics say.
With that, the county's climate-action plan had its plug pulled, and 10,000 homes were put on hold. So, too, are similar projects that might use the same strategy while the county plans its appeal in Sierra Club v. County of San Diego.
As Bruvold sees it, a dearth of homes like those that would be built in the backcountry – specifically, traditional single family homes – has led to the chasm between jobs and homes, with a lot of vehicle miles in between.
"Lots of attention has been paid to the SOS initiative," he said, but it could be a 3-5-year delay to move forward on any of the approved projects. The result is that in North County, "those people have been displaced further and further out, adding to greenhouse gas emissions as they commute in from southern and now central Riverside County."
A report released in August by the California Air Resources Board found that statewide emissions from transportation are going up.
Bruvold brought supervisors a letter and "resolution language" in hopes it might be used to "strengthen your position in the lawsuit between the county and Sierra Club that is stopping the construction of 7,000 to 10,000 homes that this board previously approved."
A housing study using SANDAG data from local plans found that historically, most additions to single family home inventory were in the North County. But from 2012-2050, single family home growth there will plunge in both the west and east metropolitan statistical areas.
Multifamily housing will prevail in all but two metropolitan statistical areas: east suburban and East County, "which may add a higher ratio of single family homes."
Not that the county is out of elbow room. A SANDAG report shows that the general plan already allows for up to 67,800 units in unincorporated San Diego County by 2035.
Here's something you might be interested in.
No new North County sprawl has its consequences
Now you will have to drive down from Riverside
No new North County sprawl has its consequences
Now you will have to drive down from Riverside
Newland Communities plan for 2135 homes in Merriam Mountains put on hold by Sierra Club suit.
Where are the high paying jobs cropping up in San Diego? North County. And where are many of the big sprawl housing projects proposed? North County.
The "two simple numbers" that really count in that equation, Erik Bruvold told county supervisors at the October 30 board meeting, are eight and one.
"Since the end of the great recession, for every eight net jobs we've added in North County, we've built one home."
So Bruvold, CEO of the San Diego North Economic Development Council, and Gary London, a real estate land-use economist with London Moeder Advisors, who spoke, are fighting a March 2020 ballot initiative that resists those developments.
Safeguard Our San Diego Countryside would require countywide voter approval for general plan amendments that increase density in semi-rural and rural areas by five or more dwelling units.
Swirling at the center of the debate about where to put housing is a cloud of carbon. With the county's nod, developers of projects like Newland Sierra and Lilac Hills, both outside Escondido, planned to mitigate greenhouse gases stemming from the increased traffic by buying carbon offsets outside the county. Planting trees, say, in another country. Which does nothing to reduce local emissions, the whole point of the county's climate action plan.
The Sierra Club sued the county, alleging that the plan failed to protect the region from greenhouse gas emissions from new development, and won. Last December, a judge halted Newland Sierra, Warner Ranch and Lilac Hills over this flaw in the approval process that lets developers "pay to pollute" as critics say.
With that, the county's climate-action plan had its plug pulled, and 10,000 homes were put on hold. So, too, are similar projects that might use the same strategy while the county plans its appeal in Sierra Club v. County of San Diego.
As Bruvold sees it, a dearth of homes like those that would be built in the backcountry – specifically, traditional single family homes – has led to the chasm between jobs and homes, with a lot of vehicle miles in between.
"Lots of attention has been paid to the SOS initiative," he said, but it could be a 3-5-year delay to move forward on any of the approved projects. The result is that in North County, "those people have been displaced further and further out, adding to greenhouse gas emissions as they commute in from southern and now central Riverside County."
A report released in August by the California Air Resources Board found that statewide emissions from transportation are going up.
Bruvold brought supervisors a letter and "resolution language" in hopes it might be used to "strengthen your position in the lawsuit between the county and Sierra Club that is stopping the construction of 7,000 to 10,000 homes that this board previously approved."
A housing study using SANDAG data from local plans found that historically, most additions to single family home inventory were in the North County. But from 2012-2050, single family home growth there will plunge in both the west and east metropolitan statistical areas.
Multifamily housing will prevail in all but two metropolitan statistical areas: east suburban and East County, "which may add a higher ratio of single family homes."
Not that the county is out of elbow room. A SANDAG report shows that the general plan already allows for up to 67,800 units in unincorporated San Diego County by 2035.
Comments