Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Devastating consequences
The problematic debate over he said/she said
Actually
Most of the stories we tell have happy endings. A preponderance of stories making national headlines tell of tragic ones. In either case, once the story ends, we can react to it, learn from it, and move on to the next.
A third class of endings prove less tidy. It might be the screen going black at the conclusion of Sopranos, or the top spinning at the end of Inception. Such uncertain finishes invite the audience to decide what kind of outcome makes the most sense, and which conclusions may be drawn from the wondering.
It can be a playful, academic exercise. But only when matters are trivial.
The San Diego Repertory production of Actually, performed at the Lyceum Theatre through November 4, depicts higher stakes. Two characters, male and female, recount the sequence of events leading up to a college campus sexual encounter, ponder whether it was consensual, and deal with the confounding questions arising in its aftermath.
To call this work topically relevant would be like calling a U.S. Supreme Court decision legally binding. The recent nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to that court, and the contentious congressional hearing that followed when Christine Blasey Ford publicly accused him of sexual assault, made the problematic debate over he said/she said accounting a national conversation.
We the public were left to draw our own conclusions. Human nature dictated that we side with the individual we wanted to believe, based on our own experiences or affiliations.
It’s impossible for us, as observers, to get this assuredly right, and only the pitfalls of getting it wrong are clear cut. Believe the accuser and risk punishing the innocent; believe the accused and risk letting the guilty get away with it. Adding to the confusion is that we live in an innocent-until-proven guilty culture, so as a matter of principle, it’s troubling to bestow guilt based on the contested testimony of a single individual.
In that sense, there’s short-term political incentive to hope the accuser is lying. It’s easier to believe no crime has been committed, so we may move on from an apparently unsolvable problem without having to endure any painful rumination.
But such rationalization is troubling for many reasons, not the least of which being that most crimes do not take place in public. We can only know they exist when a victim stands up to report it. And if the controversy over Kavanaugh can teach us anything, it’s that remaining silent so our society can avoid conflict leads to devastating long-term consequences.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Devastating consequences
The problematic debate over he said/she said
Devastating consequences
The problematic debate over he said/she said
Actually
Most of the stories we tell have happy endings. A preponderance of stories making national headlines tell of tragic ones. In either case, once the story ends, we can react to it, learn from it, and move on to the next.
A third class of endings prove less tidy. It might be the screen going black at the conclusion of Sopranos, or the top spinning at the end of Inception. Such uncertain finishes invite the audience to decide what kind of outcome makes the most sense, and which conclusions may be drawn from the wondering.
It can be a playful, academic exercise. But only when matters are trivial.
The San Diego Repertory production of Actually, performed at the Lyceum Theatre through November 4, depicts higher stakes. Two characters, male and female, recount the sequence of events leading up to a college campus sexual encounter, ponder whether it was consensual, and deal with the confounding questions arising in its aftermath.
To call this work topically relevant would be like calling a U.S. Supreme Court decision legally binding. The recent nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to that court, and the contentious congressional hearing that followed when Christine Blasey Ford publicly accused him of sexual assault, made the problematic debate over he said/she said accounting a national conversation.
We the public were left to draw our own conclusions. Human nature dictated that we side with the individual we wanted to believe, based on our own experiences or affiliations.
It’s impossible for us, as observers, to get this assuredly right, and only the pitfalls of getting it wrong are clear cut. Believe the accuser and risk punishing the innocent; believe the accused and risk letting the guilty get away with it. Adding to the confusion is that we live in an innocent-until-proven guilty culture, so as a matter of principle, it’s troubling to bestow guilt based on the contested testimony of a single individual.
In that sense, there’s short-term political incentive to hope the accuser is lying. It’s easier to believe no crime has been committed, so we may move on from an apparently unsolvable problem without having to endure any painful rumination.
But such rationalization is troubling for many reasons, not the least of which being that most crimes do not take place in public. We can only know they exist when a victim stands up to report it. And if the controversy over Kavanaugh can teach us anything, it’s that remaining silent so our society can avoid conflict leads to devastating long-term consequences.
Comments