Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Mahler medium dive
The agitations and triumphs are in the music for all to hear
Mahler’s music is overtly psychological and biographical.
I had said these articles would be a deep dive into an upcoming piece on the San Diego classical music calendar. On second thought these are more of a medium dive. A deep dive would include technical analysis of the piece and that’s just not my forte.
Mahler’s Symphony No. 1: Titan might be dwarfed by his Symphony No, 2: Resurrection but amongst first symphonic efforts Mahler’s first looms large. Is there a first symphony by any composer which is performed more often? I can’t think of one.
Sibelius’s Symphony No. 1 is as indicative of Sibelius as Mahler’s first is indicative of Mahler but there is no contest when it comes to number of performances and the scope of the composition. Sibelius follows in the steps of Tchaikovsky’s symphonies while Mahler is continuing, on an extreme tangent, down the trail that Bruckner was blazing. When it comes to writing symphonies it is difficult to top the Austrians.
Regarding the scope of Mahler’s Symphony No. 1, there are 10 French Horns, 5 trumpets, 4 trombones, tuba, 2 sets of timpani, and a lovely kitchen sink. The length of the symphony is anywhere between 55 minutes and an hour.
Mahler wrote this first symphony in 1887-88 at the age of 27. The score went through numerous revisions before finding its final form in 1996.
The music is almost immediately recognizable as Mahler. Mahler continues to extend the symphonic form as he writes symphony after symphony but his initial voice remains the same. It’s like a great actor. The actor might take on more and more challenging roles but the quality of her voice will remain consistent—even Meryl Streep sounds like Meryl Streep in all her differing actorial accents.
So it is with Mahler and his first symphony. All the Mahlerian characteristics and quirks are present from the frenetic woodwinds to the nervous strings to the stringent brass fanfares, all are present and accounted for. Another way to say that would be the shimmering woodwinds, agitato strings and stentorian brass fanfares are all present and accounted for.
Mahler’s music is overtly psychological and biographical, perhaps more than any other composer. The agitations and triumphs of his life are in the music for all to hear. Does that mean we leave the concert feeling agitated? Maybe. There’s also a chance to leave feeling triumphant. I guess it depends on what you had for breakfast that day of the concert.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Mahler medium dive
The agitations and triumphs are in the music for all to hear
Mahler medium dive
The agitations and triumphs are in the music for all to hear
Mahler’s music is overtly psychological and biographical.
I had said these articles would be a deep dive into an upcoming piece on the San Diego classical music calendar. On second thought these are more of a medium dive. A deep dive would include technical analysis of the piece and that’s just not my forte.
Mahler’s Symphony No. 1: Titan might be dwarfed by his Symphony No, 2: Resurrection but amongst first symphonic efforts Mahler’s first looms large. Is there a first symphony by any composer which is performed more often? I can’t think of one.
Sibelius’s Symphony No. 1 is as indicative of Sibelius as Mahler’s first is indicative of Mahler but there is no contest when it comes to number of performances and the scope of the composition. Sibelius follows in the steps of Tchaikovsky’s symphonies while Mahler is continuing, on an extreme tangent, down the trail that Bruckner was blazing. When it comes to writing symphonies it is difficult to top the Austrians.
Regarding the scope of Mahler’s Symphony No. 1, there are 10 French Horns, 5 trumpets, 4 trombones, tuba, 2 sets of timpani, and a lovely kitchen sink. The length of the symphony is anywhere between 55 minutes and an hour.
Mahler wrote this first symphony in 1887-88 at the age of 27. The score went through numerous revisions before finding its final form in 1996.
The music is almost immediately recognizable as Mahler. Mahler continues to extend the symphonic form as he writes symphony after symphony but his initial voice remains the same. It’s like a great actor. The actor might take on more and more challenging roles but the quality of her voice will remain consistent—even Meryl Streep sounds like Meryl Streep in all her differing actorial accents.
So it is with Mahler and his first symphony. All the Mahlerian characteristics and quirks are present from the frenetic woodwinds to the nervous strings to the stringent brass fanfares, all are present and accounted for. Another way to say that would be the shimmering woodwinds, agitato strings and stentorian brass fanfares are all present and accounted for.
Mahler’s music is overtly psychological and biographical, perhaps more than any other composer. The agitations and triumphs of his life are in the music for all to hear. Does that mean we leave the concert feeling agitated? Maybe. There’s also a chance to leave feeling triumphant. I guess it depends on what you had for breakfast that day of the concert.
Comments