Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Murphy Canyon gas-station grapple
Arco expansion roadblocked by Chevron? Or traffic?
Would the four new pumps added to the Arco station increase traffic by 75 percent at the busiest times?
Armed with the signatures of 42 Stonecrest Village residents, neighbors of the Arco gas station at Murphy Canyon and Aero Drive are fighting the business' expansion to add four new pumps and a car wash.
On Wednesday (March 15), the Kearny Mesa Planning Group agreed to hear new information presented as part of an appeal of the planning group's decision to support the project last year.
"We are concerned about the impact of increased traffic on the neighborhood," said Jim Bartell, who represents the 42 Stonecrest residents and a business down the street. "Our traffic study showed significant impacts, contrary to the city's study."
The Arco station's advocate, Alex Mucino, said he doesn't believe that it's Stonecrest Village — which is southeast of the intersection — that objected. The Arco station is long established on the north side of the intersection.
"I can't prove [Bartell is] being funded by the competition, but that's what I think," Mucino said, referring to the Chevron station just south of the intersection. "That Chevron has 16 pumping stations and a car wash and seven businesses on their 1.8-acre lot. We have 5 acres and all we're trying to do is increase our productivity and ability to compete."
Bartell declined to comment on the project's appeal and who he represents.
In January, the Kearny Mesa Planning Group recommended approval of the project, which was headed to the city's planning commission for final approval. The Arco owners want to install an 1800-square-foot canopy, a 968-square-foot car wash, and two new pumping islands that would serve four additional vehicles.
But the appeal forced the hearing off the planning commission agenda, and they sent the project back to the community planning group to review new information on traffic impacts. According to city documents, the city's Development Services Department reviewed the application and looked at a traffic report that concluded the expansion would have little impact on traffic at the corner.
"The city traffic department is standing by their report," Mucino said. "The traffic is already there — most of it is headed to Walmart or Petco or the other big stores in that stretch of Murphy Canyon Road."
But a traffic report prepared for the group challenging the Arco's growth concluded that expanding the gas station would increase traffic by 75 percent at the busiest times. And now the community planning group will look at it and send their thoughts to the planning commission. That means the project is delayed another couple of months, Mucino said.
"We started working on this in 2011 and we've spent somewhere in the $300,000 range to get this far," he said. "Most people don't know it, but you have to maintain a cash balance with the city to go through the process and we've lost track of how many times we've added another $10,000 because something came up that they had to research. There's been architectural review, biological resources review, cultural resources review, noise studies and now traffic studies."
Here's something you might be interested in.
Murphy Canyon gas-station grapple
Arco expansion roadblocked by Chevron? Or traffic?
Murphy Canyon gas-station grapple
Arco expansion roadblocked by Chevron? Or traffic?
Would the four new pumps added to the Arco station increase traffic by 75 percent at the busiest times?
Armed with the signatures of 42 Stonecrest Village residents, neighbors of the Arco gas station at Murphy Canyon and Aero Drive are fighting the business' expansion to add four new pumps and a car wash.
On Wednesday (March 15), the Kearny Mesa Planning Group agreed to hear new information presented as part of an appeal of the planning group's decision to support the project last year.
"We are concerned about the impact of increased traffic on the neighborhood," said Jim Bartell, who represents the 42 Stonecrest residents and a business down the street. "Our traffic study showed significant impacts, contrary to the city's study."
The Arco station's advocate, Alex Mucino, said he doesn't believe that it's Stonecrest Village — which is southeast of the intersection — that objected. The Arco station is long established on the north side of the intersection.
"I can't prove [Bartell is] being funded by the competition, but that's what I think," Mucino said, referring to the Chevron station just south of the intersection. "That Chevron has 16 pumping stations and a car wash and seven businesses on their 1.8-acre lot. We have 5 acres and all we're trying to do is increase our productivity and ability to compete."
Bartell declined to comment on the project's appeal and who he represents.
In January, the Kearny Mesa Planning Group recommended approval of the project, which was headed to the city's planning commission for final approval. The Arco owners want to install an 1800-square-foot canopy, a 968-square-foot car wash, and two new pumping islands that would serve four additional vehicles.
But the appeal forced the hearing off the planning commission agenda, and they sent the project back to the community planning group to review new information on traffic impacts. According to city documents, the city's Development Services Department reviewed the application and looked at a traffic report that concluded the expansion would have little impact on traffic at the corner.
"The city traffic department is standing by their report," Mucino said. "The traffic is already there — most of it is headed to Walmart or Petco or the other big stores in that stretch of Murphy Canyon Road."
But a traffic report prepared for the group challenging the Arco's growth concluded that expanding the gas station would increase traffic by 75 percent at the busiest times. And now the community planning group will look at it and send their thoughts to the planning commission. That means the project is delayed another couple of months, Mucino said.
"We started working on this in 2011 and we've spent somewhere in the $300,000 range to get this far," he said. "Most people don't know it, but you have to maintain a cash balance with the city to go through the process and we've lost track of how many times we've added another $10,000 because something came up that they had to research. There's been architectural review, biological resources review, cultural resources review, noise studies and now traffic studies."
Comments