Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Even in Miami, politicians getting smart
Some realize stadium subsidies a scam
A decade ago, taxpayers paid three-fourths of the $650 million retractable-roof stadium.
Increasingly, the media, politicians, and city leaders around the U.S. are understanding that taxpayer subsidies of pro stadiums are complete scams.
Marlin Justin Bour. Note empty seats.
Yesterday, the New York Times panned Marlins Park, the Miami stadium that will host the All-Star Game July 11. A decade ago, taxpayers paid three-fourths of the $650 million retractable-roof stadium. The Marlins argued that fans weren't turning out because of the rain and humidity. Even now with a roof, they are still not turning out; the team continues to stink. The total cost to taxpayers will be $2 billion over the life of the bonds.
The mayor of Miami-Dade County, Carlos Gimenez, was one of the few to oppose the subsidy when he was a county commissioner. Now, he notes that the team owner, Jeffrey Loria, wants to sell the team for $1.2 billion, eight times what he paid for the Marlins. Loria, if he can unload the team, will stick hundreds of millions of dollars in his pocket, thanks to Miami area taxpayers, says Gimenez.
Neil deMause of the online newsletter fieldofschemes.com is an ardent opponent of subsidies for billionaire team owners, but he doesn't think Loria will rake in his bundle because of the subsidy. The team apparently has $400 million in debt. So if you figure that Loria nets $800 million, he will make a profit of 11.41 percent per year. That's about what baseball owners make, according to Forbes numbers, and the former owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers got a 21 percent windfall without getting a stadium.
Neil de Mause says Loria may have remained "obscenely wealthy" even without the subsidy. I question that, because new subsidized stadiums generally boost the value of a team. Hopefully, subsidy discussions will escalate around the time of the big game July 11.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Even in Miami, politicians getting smart
Some realize stadium subsidies a scam
Even in Miami, politicians getting smart
Some realize stadium subsidies a scam
A decade ago, taxpayers paid three-fourths of the $650 million retractable-roof stadium.
Increasingly, the media, politicians, and city leaders around the U.S. are understanding that taxpayer subsidies of pro stadiums are complete scams.
Marlin Justin Bour. Note empty seats.
Yesterday, the New York Times panned Marlins Park, the Miami stadium that will host the All-Star Game July 11. A decade ago, taxpayers paid three-fourths of the $650 million retractable-roof stadium. The Marlins argued that fans weren't turning out because of the rain and humidity. Even now with a roof, they are still not turning out; the team continues to stink. The total cost to taxpayers will be $2 billion over the life of the bonds.
The mayor of Miami-Dade County, Carlos Gimenez, was one of the few to oppose the subsidy when he was a county commissioner. Now, he notes that the team owner, Jeffrey Loria, wants to sell the team for $1.2 billion, eight times what he paid for the Marlins. Loria, if he can unload the team, will stick hundreds of millions of dollars in his pocket, thanks to Miami area taxpayers, says Gimenez.
Neil deMause of the online newsletter fieldofschemes.com is an ardent opponent of subsidies for billionaire team owners, but he doesn't think Loria will rake in his bundle because of the subsidy. The team apparently has $400 million in debt. So if you figure that Loria nets $800 million, he will make a profit of 11.41 percent per year. That's about what baseball owners make, according to Forbes numbers, and the former owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers got a 21 percent windfall without getting a stadium.
Neil de Mause says Loria may have remained "obscenely wealthy" even without the subsidy. I question that, because new subsidized stadiums generally boost the value of a team. Hopefully, subsidy discussions will escalate around the time of the big game July 11.
Comments