Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Goldsmith loses, Briggs wins
Attorney to be paid $107,000 for fees in email case
Cory Briggs
The legal fight over city-related emails that former San Diego city attorney Jan Goldsmith sent over his private server during his time in public office has concluded, almost three years to the date that watchdog group San Diegans for Open Government filed its lawsuit.
On Friday, January 20, San Diego Superior Court judge Timothy Taylor rejected the city's second and final attempt to impose sanctions on opposing counsel, Cory Briggs, for bringing forth what they claim was a frivolous lawsuit. Taylor's decision puts an end to litigation and forces the city to pay Briggs over $100,000 in legal fees — this in addition to the $150,000 the city spent to hire outside counsel as well as the hundreds of hours in-house attorneys devoted to it.
The Case
Briggs, on behalf of San Diegans for Open Government, filed the lawsuit on January 28, 2014, alleging Goldsmith and his office refused to turn over city emails he sent to reporters and others from his private email account. The city attorney's office denied Briggs's request despite the fact that they had previously released some of the emails to the Reader and NBC San Diego.
A legal fight ensued. The city responded to the lawsuit, claiming (among other arguments) that speaking to reporters did not "relate in any way to the duties and obligations" of the city attorney. In response, Briggs filed an amended complaint that accused then–city attorney Goldsmith of wasting taxpayer money by communicating with the media during working hours. The city hired attorney Jacqueline Vinaccia to help fight the taxpayer-waste claim. Briggs later agreed to drop the claim; Goldsmith and his office, however, did not drop it.
Instead they filed papers requesting that a judge impose sanctions — in the amount of $55,772 — on Briggs for filing a frivolous claim. An appellate court later remanded the sanctions issue back to superior court. On January 20, Taylor issued the final ruling.
Taylor's Decision
"...Defendants provide no evidence demonstrating that a useless expenditure of public funds did not actually take place," wrote Taylor in a tentative ruling later made final.
Later he added, "this motion focuses on attacking the motives of [Briggs].... [T]he allegations in the taxpayer waste cause of action were supported by a factual investigation conducted by [San Diegans for Open Government's] counsel's office, anonymous whistleblower tips, and consultations that counsel had with unnamed individuals. Taken as a whole, this lawsuit had objective merit. [Briggs] dismissed the taxpayer waste cause of action in light of conversations that he had with [outside counsel Jacqueline Vinaccia].... As such, there was sufficient evidentiary support for the allegations in [the] taxpayer waste cause of action."
Taylor lifted the temporary stay that prevented Briggs from collecting his attorney fees, thus ending the case.
The city must now pay Briggs over $107,000 in legal fees.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Goldsmith loses, Briggs wins
Attorney to be paid $107,000 for fees in email case
Goldsmith loses, Briggs wins
Attorney to be paid $107,000 for fees in email case
Cory Briggs
The legal fight over city-related emails that former San Diego city attorney Jan Goldsmith sent over his private server during his time in public office has concluded, almost three years to the date that watchdog group San Diegans for Open Government filed its lawsuit.
On Friday, January 20, San Diego Superior Court judge Timothy Taylor rejected the city's second and final attempt to impose sanctions on opposing counsel, Cory Briggs, for bringing forth what they claim was a frivolous lawsuit. Taylor's decision puts an end to litigation and forces the city to pay Briggs over $100,000 in legal fees — this in addition to the $150,000 the city spent to hire outside counsel as well as the hundreds of hours in-house attorneys devoted to it.
The Case
Briggs, on behalf of San Diegans for Open Government, filed the lawsuit on January 28, 2014, alleging Goldsmith and his office refused to turn over city emails he sent to reporters and others from his private email account. The city attorney's office denied Briggs's request despite the fact that they had previously released some of the emails to the Reader and NBC San Diego.
A legal fight ensued. The city responded to the lawsuit, claiming (among other arguments) that speaking to reporters did not "relate in any way to the duties and obligations" of the city attorney. In response, Briggs filed an amended complaint that accused then–city attorney Goldsmith of wasting taxpayer money by communicating with the media during working hours. The city hired attorney Jacqueline Vinaccia to help fight the taxpayer-waste claim. Briggs later agreed to drop the claim; Goldsmith and his office, however, did not drop it.
Instead they filed papers requesting that a judge impose sanctions — in the amount of $55,772 — on Briggs for filing a frivolous claim. An appellate court later remanded the sanctions issue back to superior court. On January 20, Taylor issued the final ruling.
Taylor's Decision
"...Defendants provide no evidence demonstrating that a useless expenditure of public funds did not actually take place," wrote Taylor in a tentative ruling later made final.
Later he added, "this motion focuses on attacking the motives of [Briggs].... [T]he allegations in the taxpayer waste cause of action were supported by a factual investigation conducted by [San Diegans for Open Government's] counsel's office, anonymous whistleblower tips, and consultations that counsel had with unnamed individuals. Taken as a whole, this lawsuit had objective merit. [Briggs] dismissed the taxpayer waste cause of action in light of conversations that he had with [outside counsel Jacqueline Vinaccia].... As such, there was sufficient evidentiary support for the allegations in [the] taxpayer waste cause of action."
Taylor lifted the temporary stay that prevented Briggs from collecting his attorney fees, thus ending the case.
The city must now pay Briggs over $107,000 in legal fees.
Comments