Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Movie thief can't be found
Aargh: Cell pirate eluded lawyer and lawsuit
Last summer, a movie named Cell came out. In the plot, users of cell phones were reprogrammed into mad killers. Critics sneered. The movie was not a big hit.
The producer, Cell Film Holdings, sued a John or Jane Doe in federal court for stealing the film 107 times and distributing it countless times worldwide using BitTorrent software.
After 90 days, Cell Film Holdings attorney James S. Davis of Chula Vista asked the court for another 90 days to locate the Doe thief.
On January 23 of this year, court documents indicate that Davis threw in the towel: not having located this Doe, he dismissed the suit.
Such thievery is common. Davis says the film industry loses $150 billion a year to John and Jane Does.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Movie thief can't be found
Aargh: Cell pirate eluded lawyer and lawsuit
Movie thief can't be found
Aargh: Cell pirate eluded lawyer and lawsuit
Last summer, a movie named Cell came out. In the plot, users of cell phones were reprogrammed into mad killers. Critics sneered. The movie was not a big hit.
The producer, Cell Film Holdings, sued a John or Jane Doe in federal court for stealing the film 107 times and distributing it countless times worldwide using BitTorrent software.
After 90 days, Cell Film Holdings attorney James S. Davis of Chula Vista asked the court for another 90 days to locate the Doe thief.
On January 23 of this year, court documents indicate that Davis threw in the towel: not having located this Doe, he dismissed the suit.
Such thievery is common. Davis says the film industry loses $150 billion a year to John and Jane Does.
Comments