Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
A useless insight
Who cares about being insightful?
The ultimate destination of any artistic endeavor is freedom.
I want to discuss the term “insightful.” It's a word which is thrown around the halls of music with some frequency.
“The performance was insightful,” “Beethoven's music is insightful,” etc. We've all heard comments along those lines but what does it mean and who cares?
We will start with a definition of insightful: Having or showing an accurate and deep understanding; perceptive.
Video:
Sergiu Celibidache
...on his philosophy of music
What does this deep understanding do for us, though? It needs to lead us somewhere if it is to be of any value.
Let's say we have a deep understanding of Shostakovich and that we have responded to the insights in his music. Now what?
An insight is useless unless it is applied. We can gather insights like an obsessive philatelist but until they are applied to our existence they are “only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.”
It has been said that faith without works is dead. Likewise an insight without application is deceased.
With music the application of an insight is a nebulous affair because often times it’s not a concrete idea such as we might find in a poem or novel. Music does provide insight nonetheless.
Sergiu Celibidache said that the ultimate destination of any artistic endeavor is freedom. An insightful piece of music can expose part of the self-imposed cage in which we often exist and bring us just a bit closer to the freedom we desire.
It is easy to lose sight of this “ultimate destination”. We can become entangled in the correctness of a performance — the tempo, the phrasing, the dynamic contrasts.
We can then coronate a performance as insightful, usually when it lines up with our pre existing understanding of the piece. However, without the nudge toward freedom — who cares?
Here's something you might be interested in.
A useless insight
Who cares about being insightful?
A useless insight
Who cares about being insightful?
The ultimate destination of any artistic endeavor is freedom.
I want to discuss the term “insightful.” It's a word which is thrown around the halls of music with some frequency.
“The performance was insightful,” “Beethoven's music is insightful,” etc. We've all heard comments along those lines but what does it mean and who cares?
We will start with a definition of insightful: Having or showing an accurate and deep understanding; perceptive.
Video:
Sergiu Celibidache
...on his philosophy of music
What does this deep understanding do for us, though? It needs to lead us somewhere if it is to be of any value.
Let's say we have a deep understanding of Shostakovich and that we have responded to the insights in his music. Now what?
An insight is useless unless it is applied. We can gather insights like an obsessive philatelist but until they are applied to our existence they are “only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.”
It has been said that faith without works is dead. Likewise an insight without application is deceased.
With music the application of an insight is a nebulous affair because often times it’s not a concrete idea such as we might find in a poem or novel. Music does provide insight nonetheless.
Sergiu Celibidache said that the ultimate destination of any artistic endeavor is freedom. An insightful piece of music can expose part of the self-imposed cage in which we often exist and bring us just a bit closer to the freedom we desire.
It is easy to lose sight of this “ultimate destination”. We can become entangled in the correctness of a performance — the tempo, the phrasing, the dynamic contrasts.
We can then coronate a performance as insightful, usually when it lines up with our pre existing understanding of the piece. However, without the nudge toward freedom — who cares?
Comments