Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Veterans' affordable-housing project pulled
Minor traffic surge on Poway streets was the deal-breaker
On November 16, after two years of negotiation with Habitat for Humanity, the City of Poway rejected an affordable-housing project for veterans.
Now what? The city still needs 504 affordable-housing units to meet state mandates. Residents who fought the proposal still look out on an asphalt lot zoned for low-income, high-density housing; and veterans on a waiting list to buy one of the townhomes are out of luck.
“It is tough to build low-income housing," San Diego Habitat for Humanity president Lori Pfeiler said at the November 16 council meeting. "No one ever wants to have low-income housing next to their homes."
While the city cut its losses at over $100,000, the nonprofit had pitched in nearly $600,000; the most they had ever spent before getting final approval.
“We are extremely disappointed,” she says now in the wake of the decision. “We addressed every community and council concern we had control over.”
Mayor Steve Vaus opposed it for the cost to the city: $820,000, almost a third of the budget for affordable housing, but yielding only 4 percent of the needed units. “That would severely impair our ability to meet state-mandated housing obligations,” he said. The housing element identifies other city lots for affordable housing, and Vaus is optimistic that the “better location” neighbors called for can be found.
Deputy mayor Jim Cunningham argued that Habitat for Humanity’s proposal is the best the city has ever seen.
“I dare anyone to find me a lower-cost project,” said Cunningham, who helped push it forward two years ago, when Sacramento-based CalVet partnered with Habitat and the city faced a critical funding gap for low-income housing. “There will be no affordable-housing project in our city that will cost less out of pocket to our city than this one. None.”
In fact, Habitat would fund the entire project if the city agreed to revert to the original plan, which had six more units. The city was set to donate the lot, worth over a million dollars, but neighbors consider the empty parcel more valuable as a buffer against denser development. Many disliked the idea of having 28 new low-income townhomes across the street from single-family homes. Some complained that the costs kept changing.
“The city’s contribution did not change until this past July,” Pfeiler says. “That is when they asked us to lower the density,” which meant the cost per unit would increase. “We asked the city to make up $300,000 of the $500,000 additional deficit.”
Revenues earned will help build the next Habitat project. Vaus says CalVet was originally going to provide 100 percent of the funding for the proposed project — then they backed out. The topic was also raised at the meeting, when others wondered why CalVet withdrew; no one seemed to know why.
“Now the city is on the hook. The city has to assume a lot more risk in the project,” said councilmember, Barry Leonard. “I don’t feel we have the right developer here, and I won't support this project.”
Pfeiler says that CalVet was just one funding source. “They would only provide about a third of the funds for each home. Total.”
But the money would have been disbursed at an early stage, yielding a good cash flow to get started, she says. What caused the rift?
“CalVet backed out because I would not sign their contract. The agreement gave a third party the authority to approve the entire project, even before the city, and they could request any number of changes without having to fund them," she says. “And they only wanted a 10-year affordability restriction, compared to the city’s need for a 45-year restriction.” Habitat was always responsible for assuring the project could be completed and funds were available, she says.
For many residents, though, traffic was the deal-breaker — and that’s one issue Pfeiler says Habitat has no control over.
In fact, 80 percent of the concerns focused on traffic and safety, Cunningham said, and it’s not a new problem. Now, traffic on Twin Peaks Road has become a major “talking point” — he hopes it will, at least, lead to one solution in this “great community discussion.”
A traffic study conducted by Habitat and discussed by the city found that, with 22 new units, less than 17 trips would be added to the streets in morning peak hours, and 21 in the evening peak hours. While neighbors still see that as too many more cars, it was not considered a significant impact. Mayor Vaus says they aren’t giving up on creating homes for veterans in Poway.
“I have spoken with another organization that works closely with CalVet on affordable housing,” he says. “I expect to meet with them very soon to discuss suitable locations in the city and Poway’s strong desire to support our vets with such a project.”
Habitat is also looking to new locations. “There are still a lot of families that we can help,” Pfeiler says. “We have let our veterans know they can apply for other homes we are building in Logan Heights and El Cajon." But both projects are still a year from completion. “It isn’t much to offer. Twenty-two families will not have the opportunity to purchase a home.”
Here's something you might be interested in.
Veterans' affordable-housing project pulled
Minor traffic surge on Poway streets was the deal-breaker
Veterans' affordable-housing project pulled
Minor traffic surge on Poway streets was the deal-breaker
On November 16, after two years of negotiation with Habitat for Humanity, the City of Poway rejected an affordable-housing project for veterans.
Now what? The city still needs 504 affordable-housing units to meet state mandates. Residents who fought the proposal still look out on an asphalt lot zoned for low-income, high-density housing; and veterans on a waiting list to buy one of the townhomes are out of luck.
“It is tough to build low-income housing," San Diego Habitat for Humanity president Lori Pfeiler said at the November 16 council meeting. "No one ever wants to have low-income housing next to their homes."
While the city cut its losses at over $100,000, the nonprofit had pitched in nearly $600,000; the most they had ever spent before getting final approval.
“We are extremely disappointed,” she says now in the wake of the decision. “We addressed every community and council concern we had control over.”
Mayor Steve Vaus opposed it for the cost to the city: $820,000, almost a third of the budget for affordable housing, but yielding only 4 percent of the needed units. “That would severely impair our ability to meet state-mandated housing obligations,” he said. The housing element identifies other city lots for affordable housing, and Vaus is optimistic that the “better location” neighbors called for can be found.
Deputy mayor Jim Cunningham argued that Habitat for Humanity’s proposal is the best the city has ever seen.
“I dare anyone to find me a lower-cost project,” said Cunningham, who helped push it forward two years ago, when Sacramento-based CalVet partnered with Habitat and the city faced a critical funding gap for low-income housing. “There will be no affordable-housing project in our city that will cost less out of pocket to our city than this one. None.”
In fact, Habitat would fund the entire project if the city agreed to revert to the original plan, which had six more units. The city was set to donate the lot, worth over a million dollars, but neighbors consider the empty parcel more valuable as a buffer against denser development. Many disliked the idea of having 28 new low-income townhomes across the street from single-family homes. Some complained that the costs kept changing.
“The city’s contribution did not change until this past July,” Pfeiler says. “That is when they asked us to lower the density,” which meant the cost per unit would increase. “We asked the city to make up $300,000 of the $500,000 additional deficit.”
Revenues earned will help build the next Habitat project. Vaus says CalVet was originally going to provide 100 percent of the funding for the proposed project — then they backed out. The topic was also raised at the meeting, when others wondered why CalVet withdrew; no one seemed to know why.
“Now the city is on the hook. The city has to assume a lot more risk in the project,” said councilmember, Barry Leonard. “I don’t feel we have the right developer here, and I won't support this project.”
Pfeiler says that CalVet was just one funding source. “They would only provide about a third of the funds for each home. Total.”
But the money would have been disbursed at an early stage, yielding a good cash flow to get started, she says. What caused the rift?
“CalVet backed out because I would not sign their contract. The agreement gave a third party the authority to approve the entire project, even before the city, and they could request any number of changes without having to fund them," she says. “And they only wanted a 10-year affordability restriction, compared to the city’s need for a 45-year restriction.” Habitat was always responsible for assuring the project could be completed and funds were available, she says.
For many residents, though, traffic was the deal-breaker — and that’s one issue Pfeiler says Habitat has no control over.
In fact, 80 percent of the concerns focused on traffic and safety, Cunningham said, and it’s not a new problem. Now, traffic on Twin Peaks Road has become a major “talking point” — he hopes it will, at least, lead to one solution in this “great community discussion.”
A traffic study conducted by Habitat and discussed by the city found that, with 22 new units, less than 17 trips would be added to the streets in morning peak hours, and 21 in the evening peak hours. While neighbors still see that as too many more cars, it was not considered a significant impact. Mayor Vaus says they aren’t giving up on creating homes for veterans in Poway.
“I have spoken with another organization that works closely with CalVet on affordable housing,” he says. “I expect to meet with them very soon to discuss suitable locations in the city and Poway’s strong desire to support our vets with such a project.”
Habitat is also looking to new locations. “There are still a lot of families that we can help,” Pfeiler says. “We have let our veterans know they can apply for other homes we are building in Logan Heights and El Cajon." But both projects are still a year from completion. “It isn’t much to offer. Twenty-two families will not have the opportunity to purchase a home.”
Comments