Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Lilac Hills opponents mum on money source
Well-funded Measure B proponents file lawsuit to force transparency
Proposed site of development (east of I-15)
Lilac Hills Ranch is a proposed master-planned community that developer Accretive Investments hopes to build east of Bonsall in northeastern San Diego County.
Yesterday (November 2), proponents of the development filed a formal legal complaint, accusing Measure B's opponents of funneling money into their campaign without proper disclosure, as required by state law.
If approved, the project would add 1700 homes as well as commercial and retail space to a 600-acre plot of land. The problem: the land is currently zoned for just over a 100 homes and would, as proposed, be in violation of the county's general plan.
In order to bypass the plan and ease zoning restrictions, Accretive Investments decided to forego seeking board approval and instead put the question to voters, in the form of Measure B.
In recent weeks, as reported by the Reader and online news organization inewsource, money has flowed to campaigns for and against the development. The largest donor is Accretive Investments, which has thrown in over $4.2 million to get the ballot measure passed; the "no" campaign, meanwhile, has received under $300,000.
While the two sides are not on an even playing field in regards to campaign cash, it is the proponents of the project who say the "no" campaign is illegally laundering campaign money in order to avoid transparency.
At issue is an early October donation of $110,000 from the nonprofit California Local Energy — Advancing Renewables (CLEAR) to Save Our Forest and Ranch Lands (SOFAR), the nonprofit that was organized to oppose Measure B. SOFAR then made a series of donations to other Measure B opponents.
According to the November 2 lawsuit, neither nonprofit has disclosed exactly where that $110,000 came from or the identity of the original donors.
When pressed on the matter, according to the lawsuit, California Local Energy — Advancing Renewables has stated that the group will make the donors public when the state Fair and Political Practices Commission requires them to do so.
In response, Nancy Layne, the most outspoken proponent of the Lilac Hills development, filed complaints with the commission, informing them of the violations. According to the lawsuit, the nonprofits have still not acted, which gave Layne no alternative other than to file a lawsuit against the groups and its officers.
Layne is asking that a judge order the two nonprofits to file the necessary disclosures immediately as well as pay for all attorney fees.
UPDATE 11/4, 12:15 p.m.
According to a source close to the case, a San Diego Superior Court judge on November 4 dismissed the lawsuit due to insufficient evidence showing wrongdoing by Save Our Forest and Ranch Lands (SOFAR).
Here's something you might be interested in.
Lilac Hills opponents mum on money source
Well-funded Measure B proponents file lawsuit to force transparency
Lilac Hills opponents mum on money source
Well-funded Measure B proponents file lawsuit to force transparency
Proposed site of development (east of I-15)
Lilac Hills Ranch is a proposed master-planned community that developer Accretive Investments hopes to build east of Bonsall in northeastern San Diego County.
Yesterday (November 2), proponents of the development filed a formal legal complaint, accusing Measure B's opponents of funneling money into their campaign without proper disclosure, as required by state law.
If approved, the project would add 1700 homes as well as commercial and retail space to a 600-acre plot of land. The problem: the land is currently zoned for just over a 100 homes and would, as proposed, be in violation of the county's general plan.
In order to bypass the plan and ease zoning restrictions, Accretive Investments decided to forego seeking board approval and instead put the question to voters, in the form of Measure B.
In recent weeks, as reported by the Reader and online news organization inewsource, money has flowed to campaigns for and against the development. The largest donor is Accretive Investments, which has thrown in over $4.2 million to get the ballot measure passed; the "no" campaign, meanwhile, has received under $300,000.
While the two sides are not on an even playing field in regards to campaign cash, it is the proponents of the project who say the "no" campaign is illegally laundering campaign money in order to avoid transparency.
At issue is an early October donation of $110,000 from the nonprofit California Local Energy — Advancing Renewables (CLEAR) to Save Our Forest and Ranch Lands (SOFAR), the nonprofit that was organized to oppose Measure B. SOFAR then made a series of donations to other Measure B opponents.
According to the November 2 lawsuit, neither nonprofit has disclosed exactly where that $110,000 came from or the identity of the original donors.
When pressed on the matter, according to the lawsuit, California Local Energy — Advancing Renewables has stated that the group will make the donors public when the state Fair and Political Practices Commission requires them to do so.
In response, Nancy Layne, the most outspoken proponent of the Lilac Hills development, filed complaints with the commission, informing them of the violations. According to the lawsuit, the nonprofits have still not acted, which gave Layne no alternative other than to file a lawsuit against the groups and its officers.
Layne is asking that a judge order the two nonprofits to file the necessary disclosures immediately as well as pay for all attorney fees.
UPDATE 11/4, 12:15 p.m.
According to a source close to the case, a San Diego Superior Court judge on November 4 dismissed the lawsuit due to insufficient evidence showing wrongdoing by Save Our Forest and Ranch Lands (SOFAR).
Comments