Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
How is dictatorship still a thing?
Gaddafi couldn’t even trust his own food
New cuisine meets the cult of personality in one act.
Unless you saw it at SD Fringe, none of you reading this will see Qaddafi’s Cook, which dramatizes the life of a Mexican chef who tripped on Ayahuasca and took a job as one of Muammar Gaddafi’s personal cooks. It showed four times, and now it’s gone; off to New York and Chicago. From there, who knows? Maybe it will come back to San Diego at some point, but I doubt it. This is fringe theater, and Qaddafi’s Cook will remain small in scope and action.
Which makes me want to extract something bigger from the play, because ideas don’t have to limit themselves to their packaging. They grow.
So, I want to know: How are dictatorships still a thing?
In Qaddafi’s Cook, one of the supporting characters, a Spaniard who prepares paella for “the Doctor,” meets an untimely end when he asserts that Gaddafi’s rule is so shaky that “[Gaddafi] can’t even trust his own food.”
This rings true. History indicates many dictatorships are a popular uprising away from total collapse. Iron-fisted as their rules may seem, authoritarian leaders often wield less actual power than they would have the world and their subjects believe.
Yet, Robert Mugabe has ruled Zimbabwe for 30 years, depression-stricken Venezuela crumbles under an authoritarian regime that’s looking suspiciously dictatorial, and North Koreans bow to the third-generation of a ludicrous personality cult.
If these rules are as fragile as conventional wisdom would have us believe, that they could be torn down in a day, then how is this still a thing?
Muammar Gaddafi’s Libyan regime should be a relic of the 1970s, a footnote to history, but it only ended with his death in 2011. Could there be a more sobering reminder of our collective vulnerability to the lure of authoritarian rule? Even the U.S. is not 100 percent safe. We could have succumbed to dictatorship during the Great Depression and WWII, but we got lucky. The Roosevelt administration only flirted with the idea. Still, the perplexing existence of dictatorial regimes suggests that people continually embrace an illusion of national power even as rampaging goon squads terrorize the populace. So long as the subjects of dictatorship perceive their rulers’ power as real, strongmen and warlords will endure.
Here's something you might be interested in.
How is dictatorship still a thing?
Gaddafi couldn’t even trust his own food
How is dictatorship still a thing?
Gaddafi couldn’t even trust his own food
New cuisine meets the cult of personality in one act.
Unless you saw it at SD Fringe, none of you reading this will see Qaddafi’s Cook, which dramatizes the life of a Mexican chef who tripped on Ayahuasca and took a job as one of Muammar Gaddafi’s personal cooks. It showed four times, and now it’s gone; off to New York and Chicago. From there, who knows? Maybe it will come back to San Diego at some point, but I doubt it. This is fringe theater, and Qaddafi’s Cook will remain small in scope and action.
Which makes me want to extract something bigger from the play, because ideas don’t have to limit themselves to their packaging. They grow.
So, I want to know: How are dictatorships still a thing?
In Qaddafi’s Cook, one of the supporting characters, a Spaniard who prepares paella for “the Doctor,” meets an untimely end when he asserts that Gaddafi’s rule is so shaky that “[Gaddafi] can’t even trust his own food.”
This rings true. History indicates many dictatorships are a popular uprising away from total collapse. Iron-fisted as their rules may seem, authoritarian leaders often wield less actual power than they would have the world and their subjects believe.
Yet, Robert Mugabe has ruled Zimbabwe for 30 years, depression-stricken Venezuela crumbles under an authoritarian regime that’s looking suspiciously dictatorial, and North Koreans bow to the third-generation of a ludicrous personality cult.
If these rules are as fragile as conventional wisdom would have us believe, that they could be torn down in a day, then how is this still a thing?
Muammar Gaddafi’s Libyan regime should be a relic of the 1970s, a footnote to history, but it only ended with his death in 2011. Could there be a more sobering reminder of our collective vulnerability to the lure of authoritarian rule? Even the U.S. is not 100 percent safe. We could have succumbed to dictatorship during the Great Depression and WWII, but we got lucky. The Roosevelt administration only flirted with the idea. Still, the perplexing existence of dictatorial regimes suggests that people continually embrace an illusion of national power even as rampaging goon squads terrorize the populace. So long as the subjects of dictatorship perceive their rulers’ power as real, strongmen and warlords will endure.
Comments