Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Lawsuit filed over paramilitary training facility in Alpine
Shoot first. Ask later
As promised, environmental attorney Marco Gonzalez has filed a lawsuit against the County of San Diego for granting a permit to a 160-acre firearms training facility called Covert Canyon tucked away in the mountains of Alpine.
Gonzalez and his Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation, in conjunction with the Cleveland National Forest Foundation, filed the writ of mandate on January 8. The groups are requesting that a judge order a cease fire on the property due to what they claim is an illegal permit granted to Covert Canyon owner Mark Halcon without conducting any environmental review, as required by state law.
Not the first round
The lawsuit is just the latest in what has been nearly a decade of controversy surrounding Covert Canyon.
According to information in the lawsuit, county staffers sent a cease and desist letter to Halcon in May 2007, ordering an end to paramilitary training in Covert Canyon. A few months later the U.S. Department of Agriculture sent similar demands to Halcon for illegal grading and nonpermitted construction, as well as use of firearms in a national park.
In 2010 Halcon tried a different tact by applying for a "major use permit" to use the facility. The county denied the application. The following year, after reports that paramilitary training continued to occur on the site, county staffers issued its first civil penalty notice for, according to the lawsuit, "illegal operation of a paramilitary training facility and shooting range at Covert Canyon."
Later in 2011, the county capitulated. It allowed firearm activity on the property but prohibited any private or commercial shooting ranges from opening.
That was how it stood until October 2015 when the county's planning department reversed its position. The department head determined that a "major use permit" is not needed for paramilitary and law enforcement training facilities. The decision sparked a backlash from residents living nearby. They appealed the decision. Each time the planning group and planning director rejected their appeals.
The lawsuit
On January 6 Gonzalez sent a letter to county counsel Paul Mehnert notifying him that a lawsuit was on its way.
"Please accept this correspondence as formal notification that Petitioners intend to file suit against the County of San Diego for its approval of the Covert Canyon Stipulated Administrative Enforcement Order, the director’s determination to classify Covert Canyon uses as Law Enforcement Services, and for failure to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act and Williamson Act..."
Two days later Gonzalez and company filed the lawsuit in superior court.
"Despite its pristine and sensitive surroundings, Covert Canyon has been the site of unlawful development, commercial shooting and paramilitary training activities since it was purchased nearly a decade ago," reads the lawsuit. "Because of the remote location of the property, effective County enforcement has proven both impractical and infeasible as staff is unable to monitor the site effectively. Under the guise of patriotism and discretion, and ignoring its ministerial and statutory duties, the County abused its discretion in making the use classification and approving the [permit]."
The lawsuit will now make its way through the courts. A hearing has not yet been scheduled.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Lawsuit filed over paramilitary training facility in Alpine
Shoot first. Ask later
Lawsuit filed over paramilitary training facility in Alpine
Shoot first. Ask later
As promised, environmental attorney Marco Gonzalez has filed a lawsuit against the County of San Diego for granting a permit to a 160-acre firearms training facility called Covert Canyon tucked away in the mountains of Alpine.
Gonzalez and his Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation, in conjunction with the Cleveland National Forest Foundation, filed the writ of mandate on January 8. The groups are requesting that a judge order a cease fire on the property due to what they claim is an illegal permit granted to Covert Canyon owner Mark Halcon without conducting any environmental review, as required by state law.
Not the first round
The lawsuit is just the latest in what has been nearly a decade of controversy surrounding Covert Canyon.
According to information in the lawsuit, county staffers sent a cease and desist letter to Halcon in May 2007, ordering an end to paramilitary training in Covert Canyon. A few months later the U.S. Department of Agriculture sent similar demands to Halcon for illegal grading and nonpermitted construction, as well as use of firearms in a national park.
In 2010 Halcon tried a different tact by applying for a "major use permit" to use the facility. The county denied the application. The following year, after reports that paramilitary training continued to occur on the site, county staffers issued its first civil penalty notice for, according to the lawsuit, "illegal operation of a paramilitary training facility and shooting range at Covert Canyon."
Later in 2011, the county capitulated. It allowed firearm activity on the property but prohibited any private or commercial shooting ranges from opening.
That was how it stood until October 2015 when the county's planning department reversed its position. The department head determined that a "major use permit" is not needed for paramilitary and law enforcement training facilities. The decision sparked a backlash from residents living nearby. They appealed the decision. Each time the planning group and planning director rejected their appeals.
The lawsuit
On January 6 Gonzalez sent a letter to county counsel Paul Mehnert notifying him that a lawsuit was on its way.
"Please accept this correspondence as formal notification that Petitioners intend to file suit against the County of San Diego for its approval of the Covert Canyon Stipulated Administrative Enforcement Order, the director’s determination to classify Covert Canyon uses as Law Enforcement Services, and for failure to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act and Williamson Act..."
Two days later Gonzalez and company filed the lawsuit in superior court.
"Despite its pristine and sensitive surroundings, Covert Canyon has been the site of unlawful development, commercial shooting and paramilitary training activities since it was purchased nearly a decade ago," reads the lawsuit. "Because of the remote location of the property, effective County enforcement has proven both impractical and infeasible as staff is unable to monitor the site effectively. Under the guise of patriotism and discretion, and ignoring its ministerial and statutory duties, the County abused its discretion in making the use classification and approving the [permit]."
The lawsuit will now make its way through the courts. A hearing has not yet been scheduled.
Comments