Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
John Blackwood McEwen: Outlaw or composer?
The esoteric pick of the week is back
Solway Firth
John Blackwood McEwen was a Scottish drifter who killed nine men in gunfights between 1889 and 1895. He was the scourge of the New Mexico territory and finally had his neck stretched in 1899. He was the last victim of vigilantism in the Southwest.
If only it were true. With a name such as John Blackwood McEwen one hopes for a biography of romantic adventures. In reality, Sir John Blackwood McEwen was a reticent Scotsman who’s romantic adventures were carried out in music.
Video:
Solway Symphony
Sir John Blackwood McEwen (1911)
Today’s adventure is the Solway Symphony. Solway Firth is a coastal area along the border of Scotland and England. McEwen used his native land as inspiration for his music but he was not particularly nationalistic.
This Solway Symphony is, as are almost all of the esoteric picks of the week, an appealing piece of music which is tonal. There is no hint that Stravinsky, Prokofiev, or Schoenberg ever existed even though they are his historical colleagues.
The problem with McEwen’s music and that of our other esoteric composers is that they have been condemned, more or less, as derivative. No composer has ever composed without influences and inspiration from other composers.
The value seems to come when a composer takes the influences and then advances the conversation. Prokofiev’s first symphony has the cognomen Classical because he tried to compose as if he were Haydn in the current day. This is clearly bailing out.
It’s Prokofiev’s first symphony, not his second, third, or fourth. For his first symphony he blatantly looks to Haydn for guidance and then composes the piece in his own musical language. Nobody faults Prokofiev for this because he is advancing the conversation.
What would it sound like if Haydn composed a symphony in 1917? Prokofiev proposes the question and then gives us an answer. We are satisfied even though it’s a one-sided conversation.
I think we can open ourselves up to composers such as McEwen because they have written great music even if it hasn’t reshaped musical history. Of course, we get so excited to make statements such as, “Music was never the same after blah, blah, blah” or “The course of operatic history pivoted at its foundations after blah, blah, blah.”
It’s just a tad pretentious. No?
None of that rhetoric means that music which isn’t that is music which isn’t worth hearing.
Here's something you might be interested in.
John Blackwood McEwen: Outlaw or composer?
The esoteric pick of the week is back
John Blackwood McEwen: Outlaw or composer?
The esoteric pick of the week is back
Solway Firth
John Blackwood McEwen was a Scottish drifter who killed nine men in gunfights between 1889 and 1895. He was the scourge of the New Mexico territory and finally had his neck stretched in 1899. He was the last victim of vigilantism in the Southwest.
If only it were true. With a name such as John Blackwood McEwen one hopes for a biography of romantic adventures. In reality, Sir John Blackwood McEwen was a reticent Scotsman who’s romantic adventures were carried out in music.
Video:
Solway Symphony
Sir John Blackwood McEwen (1911)
Today’s adventure is the Solway Symphony. Solway Firth is a coastal area along the border of Scotland and England. McEwen used his native land as inspiration for his music but he was not particularly nationalistic.
This Solway Symphony is, as are almost all of the esoteric picks of the week, an appealing piece of music which is tonal. There is no hint that Stravinsky, Prokofiev, or Schoenberg ever existed even though they are his historical colleagues.
The problem with McEwen’s music and that of our other esoteric composers is that they have been condemned, more or less, as derivative. No composer has ever composed without influences and inspiration from other composers.
The value seems to come when a composer takes the influences and then advances the conversation. Prokofiev’s first symphony has the cognomen Classical because he tried to compose as if he were Haydn in the current day. This is clearly bailing out.
It’s Prokofiev’s first symphony, not his second, third, or fourth. For his first symphony he blatantly looks to Haydn for guidance and then composes the piece in his own musical language. Nobody faults Prokofiev for this because he is advancing the conversation.
What would it sound like if Haydn composed a symphony in 1917? Prokofiev proposes the question and then gives us an answer. We are satisfied even though it’s a one-sided conversation.
I think we can open ourselves up to composers such as McEwen because they have written great music even if it hasn’t reshaped musical history. Of course, we get so excited to make statements such as, “Music was never the same after blah, blah, blah” or “The course of operatic history pivoted at its foundations after blah, blah, blah.”
It’s just a tad pretentious. No?
None of that rhetoric means that music which isn’t that is music which isn’t worth hearing.
Comments