Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
More body cameras for SDPD
Chief Zimmerman intends to keep tight control of recorded evidence
SDPD chief Shelley Zimmerman
The City of San Diego wants body cameras for all uniformed police officers. On Thursday, November 12, city councilmembers sitting on the Public Safety Committee are expected to authorize spending another $1.85 million to purchase additional cameras for the coming years and extending the contract with TASER International, the company that manufacturers and sells the cameras.
If approved, the total contract amount over six years will increase to $5.8 million.
Taser's Axon Body camera goes for $399
According to a staff report, San Diego is poised to become the "largest city in the nation to implement body worn cameras."
Currently, 945 officers in San Diego wear the cameras while on duty. If the contract extension is approved, that number will rise to nearly 1100 by 2020.
Lights, camera, inaction
And while San Diego's police department has stated its commitment to having its officers record interactions with the public, it is unclear if the public will ever have the privilege of viewing the footage.
San Diego police chief Shelley Zimmerman told local journalists she would release police videos only to quell the potential for riots, according to an interview she gave to NBC 7 San Diego's Paul Krueger and as reported by Voice of San Diego in September of this year.
“It could be again for public safety. It could be, as we have seen in other cities where public safety is at risk, where people are damaging property, assaulting people, in a riot type situation. There could be exceptions, yes. And that’s where you’d have to weigh the public safety versus the due process of whoever that individual is.”
More cameras, less complaints
Data shows that members of the public have submitted fewer complaints to the department when police officers have their cameras on, according to a September 8 article in the San Diego Union-Tribune. At the same time, however, the report shows that the use of force by the same officers increased by 10 percent.
Zimmerman emphasized her intent to not release the footage, unless to quell a riot, in an interview with the paper's editorial board.
Civil-rights groups such as the Americans for Civil Liberties Union support the use of body cameras, but the group has concerns as to how to balance the public's rights to the footage.
A March 2015 report by the ACLU reads in part:
"Body cameras are not justified for use by government officials who do not have the authority to conduct searches and make arrests, such as parking enforcement officers, building inspectors, teachers, or other non-law enforcement personnel.
"Police officers have the authority, in specific circumstances, to shoot to kill, to use brutal force, and to arrest people — and all too often, abuse those powers. The strong oversight function that body cameras promise to play with regards to police officers makes that deployment of the technology a unique one.
"For other officials, the use of body cameras does not strike the right balance between the oversight function of these cameras and their potential intrusiveness."
Here's something you might be interested in.
More body cameras for SDPD
Chief Zimmerman intends to keep tight control of recorded evidence
More body cameras for SDPD
Chief Zimmerman intends to keep tight control of recorded evidence
SDPD chief Shelley Zimmerman
The City of San Diego wants body cameras for all uniformed police officers. On Thursday, November 12, city councilmembers sitting on the Public Safety Committee are expected to authorize spending another $1.85 million to purchase additional cameras for the coming years and extending the contract with TASER International, the company that manufacturers and sells the cameras.
If approved, the total contract amount over six years will increase to $5.8 million.
Taser's Axon Body camera goes for $399
According to a staff report, San Diego is poised to become the "largest city in the nation to implement body worn cameras."
Currently, 945 officers in San Diego wear the cameras while on duty. If the contract extension is approved, that number will rise to nearly 1100 by 2020.
Lights, camera, inaction
And while San Diego's police department has stated its commitment to having its officers record interactions with the public, it is unclear if the public will ever have the privilege of viewing the footage.
San Diego police chief Shelley Zimmerman told local journalists she would release police videos only to quell the potential for riots, according to an interview she gave to NBC 7 San Diego's Paul Krueger and as reported by Voice of San Diego in September of this year.
“It could be again for public safety. It could be, as we have seen in other cities where public safety is at risk, where people are damaging property, assaulting people, in a riot type situation. There could be exceptions, yes. And that’s where you’d have to weigh the public safety versus the due process of whoever that individual is.”
More cameras, less complaints
Data shows that members of the public have submitted fewer complaints to the department when police officers have their cameras on, according to a September 8 article in the San Diego Union-Tribune. At the same time, however, the report shows that the use of force by the same officers increased by 10 percent.
Zimmerman emphasized her intent to not release the footage, unless to quell a riot, in an interview with the paper's editorial board.
Civil-rights groups such as the Americans for Civil Liberties Union support the use of body cameras, but the group has concerns as to how to balance the public's rights to the footage.
A March 2015 report by the ACLU reads in part:
"Body cameras are not justified for use by government officials who do not have the authority to conduct searches and make arrests, such as parking enforcement officers, building inspectors, teachers, or other non-law enforcement personnel.
"Police officers have the authority, in specific circumstances, to shoot to kill, to use brutal force, and to arrest people — and all too often, abuse those powers. The strong oversight function that body cameras promise to play with regards to police officers makes that deployment of the technology a unique one.
Comments"For other officials, the use of body cameras does not strike the right balance between the oversight function of these cameras and their potential intrusiveness."