Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Alibaba and ten executives
Local law firms open (sesame) a case against Chinese company
Alibaba HQ
China's Alibaba Group Holding, one of the hottest initial public offerings in the United States last fall, is being sued by San Diego law firms as well as other firms across America.
Early this year, after Alibaba stock had soared, the Chinese regulatory body, the "State Administration of Industry and Commerce," issued a white paper accusing Alibaba of selling counterfeit goods and restricted weapons, faking transactions to fatten reported sales volume, and engaging in anticompetitive behavior. Staffers had taken bribes, charged the regulator.
San Diego law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd filed a suit against Alibaba in New York early this year. San Diego's Finkelstein & Krinsk filed suit this month in San Diego federal court. That suit charges that Alibaba had met with the regulator in July of last year, two months before its red-hot public offering. The stock shot up to above $119 initially and recently has been around $88.
Prior to the disclosure of the regulatory white paper, two top Alibaba executives dumped 368 million U.S. shares in the company, raking in more than $25 billion, says the Finkelstein & Krinsk suit. That suit is a putative class action representing investors who bought Alibaba shares between October 21 of last year and the present.
The suit names ten Alibaba executives — not 40, as show up in the old folk tale, Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Alibaba and ten executives
Local law firms open (sesame) a case against Chinese company
Alibaba and ten executives
Local law firms open (sesame) a case against Chinese company
Alibaba HQ
China's Alibaba Group Holding, one of the hottest initial public offerings in the United States last fall, is being sued by San Diego law firms as well as other firms across America.
Early this year, after Alibaba stock had soared, the Chinese regulatory body, the "State Administration of Industry and Commerce," issued a white paper accusing Alibaba of selling counterfeit goods and restricted weapons, faking transactions to fatten reported sales volume, and engaging in anticompetitive behavior. Staffers had taken bribes, charged the regulator.
San Diego law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd filed a suit against Alibaba in New York early this year. San Diego's Finkelstein & Krinsk filed suit this month in San Diego federal court. That suit charges that Alibaba had met with the regulator in July of last year, two months before its red-hot public offering. The stock shot up to above $119 initially and recently has been around $88.
Prior to the disclosure of the regulatory white paper, two top Alibaba executives dumped 368 million U.S. shares in the company, raking in more than $25 billion, says the Finkelstein & Krinsk suit. That suit is a putative class action representing investors who bought Alibaba shares between October 21 of last year and the present.
The suit names ten Alibaba executives — not 40, as show up in the old folk tale, Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves.
Comments