Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
No golf course...how about a sand mine?
Lakeside locals displeased that equestrian trails may be eliminated
Area of proposed sand mine
The El Monte Sand Mine and Nature Preserve plan met resistance from more than 100 residents at a Lakeside Community Planning Group meeting Wednesday, June 3.
The plan for mining, according to county project manager Jim Bennett, uses enough water for 236 households but eventually provides endangered species habitat.
The project is the latest plan for a Lakeside river valley that has been both fought over and mostly unused — except by equestrians — because every venture that has been proposed, since at least 1997, has failed.
Those failures have allowed local horse folks to develop a well-used trail network and create related businesses around the 580-acre parcel El Monte wants to develop.
“We are very concerned about those riverbed trails — there are over 100 equestrian-related businesses in Lakeside,” said Diane Carter of the San Diego Trails Alliance. “Many of the boarding facilities back up on the riverbed trails and rely on those trails.”
El Monte Nature Preserve, LLC, with an address in Solana Beach, has filed the latest proposal for the land with the county planning department. The land belonged to the Helix Water District, which transferred the land as part of an August 2014 settlement with El Capitan Golf Course LLC — which has now become the nature preserve LLC.
In 1997, the water district leased a 480-acre property to developers whose plan to build a golf course fell apart in 2005, and the company began looking into sand mining. In 2010, the water district planned to site a wastewater-recycling plant there. Helix also looked at getting into the sand-mining business.
According to its reports, the riverbed is full of high-quality sand — about 15 million cubic yards of which the company now wants to extract using a water-sedimentation process. During the lawsuit, the value of the sand was estimated at $40 million, according to court records.
The plan calls for sand extraction over a period of 15 years, with restoration of habitat as the company finishes with each area. Right now, there are more than a half dozen endangered species in the open area, residents said.
For residents around the property, mostly south of Willow Road and north of El Monte, that means an estimated 255 dump-truck trips a day, according to Bennett. With the proposed sand pit going as much as 100 feet below its current bottom, a threat is presented to the water wells in the area.
“I like my well, I like my septic tank…we like that part of Lakeside where we are not encumbered by water bills,” said Zak Norman, who has lived nearby for more than 20 years.
But even if residents defeat the plan, some project is going to end up in that river bottom, planning-group members and a few residents said in poorly received comments.
“Those are not our trails,” Joan Embry Pillsbury said. “I don’t want to lose what we have in this valley but we may have to make some concessions — we need to get to the table and find a solution to save our valley…. If this one goes down, there will be another and another [project].”
The planning board voted unanimously against the plan — which will continue to come back to the planning group as it evolves.
Here's something you might be interested in.
No golf course...how about a sand mine?
Lakeside locals displeased that equestrian trails may be eliminated
No golf course...how about a sand mine?
Lakeside locals displeased that equestrian trails may be eliminated
Area of proposed sand mine
The El Monte Sand Mine and Nature Preserve plan met resistance from more than 100 residents at a Lakeside Community Planning Group meeting Wednesday, June 3.
The plan for mining, according to county project manager Jim Bennett, uses enough water for 236 households but eventually provides endangered species habitat.
The project is the latest plan for a Lakeside river valley that has been both fought over and mostly unused — except by equestrians — because every venture that has been proposed, since at least 1997, has failed.
Those failures have allowed local horse folks to develop a well-used trail network and create related businesses around the 580-acre parcel El Monte wants to develop.
“We are very concerned about those riverbed trails — there are over 100 equestrian-related businesses in Lakeside,” said Diane Carter of the San Diego Trails Alliance. “Many of the boarding facilities back up on the riverbed trails and rely on those trails.”
El Monte Nature Preserve, LLC, with an address in Solana Beach, has filed the latest proposal for the land with the county planning department. The land belonged to the Helix Water District, which transferred the land as part of an August 2014 settlement with El Capitan Golf Course LLC — which has now become the nature preserve LLC.
In 1997, the water district leased a 480-acre property to developers whose plan to build a golf course fell apart in 2005, and the company began looking into sand mining. In 2010, the water district planned to site a wastewater-recycling plant there. Helix also looked at getting into the sand-mining business.
According to its reports, the riverbed is full of high-quality sand — about 15 million cubic yards of which the company now wants to extract using a water-sedimentation process. During the lawsuit, the value of the sand was estimated at $40 million, according to court records.
The plan calls for sand extraction over a period of 15 years, with restoration of habitat as the company finishes with each area. Right now, there are more than a half dozen endangered species in the open area, residents said.
For residents around the property, mostly south of Willow Road and north of El Monte, that means an estimated 255 dump-truck trips a day, according to Bennett. With the proposed sand pit going as much as 100 feet below its current bottom, a threat is presented to the water wells in the area.
“I like my well, I like my septic tank…we like that part of Lakeside where we are not encumbered by water bills,” said Zak Norman, who has lived nearby for more than 20 years.
But even if residents defeat the plan, some project is going to end up in that river bottom, planning-group members and a few residents said in poorly received comments.
“Those are not our trails,” Joan Embry Pillsbury said. “I don’t want to lose what we have in this valley but we may have to make some concessions — we need to get to the table and find a solution to save our valley…. If this one goes down, there will be another and another [project].”
The planning board voted unanimously against the plan — which will continue to come back to the planning group as it evolves.
Comments