Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
I grazed her breast, so what?
Attorneys claim former mayor's actions amount to gender violence
Bob Filner
Technically, former mayor Bob Filner may have touched city employee Stacy McKenzie's breasts, but it was an "inadvertent, unintentional grazing of [her] breasts," with his elbow.
That's the crux of the city's argument as to why McKenzie's lawsuit doesn't hold water.
On February 13, the city will present their argument to Superior Court judge Joan M. Lewis.
The demurrer, essentially a “so what” in legal speak, debunks McKenzie's claims that Filner's hug from behind, his rubbing of her arm, and the elbow resting atop her breasts, is not evidence of gender violence or sexual battery.
"...[There are] no allegations whatsoever in the [first amended complaint] that Filner ever made or attempted contact with Plaintiff's sexual organ, anus, groin, or buttocks," reads the city's demurrer. "And, in regard to Plaintiff's breasts, the only thing Plaintiff alleges is that when Filner was embracing Plaintiff from behind on the one alleged occasion, with his arm around her neck and shoulder, his elbow happened to rest on top of her breasts. There is no allegation that Filner purposely touched her breasts or that, through his actions, he was intentionally making or trying to make contact with her breasts. An inadvertent, unintentional grazing of Plaintiff's breasts with an elbow is not enough to constitute sexual battery."
The complaint, filed in December 2013, alleged that then-mayor Filner made unwarranted advances on McKenzie, a longtime Parks and Recreation Dept. employee, during an event at Fiesta Island. McKenzie says that after a brief introduction, Filner approached her and asked her if she wanted to go on a date with him. McKenzie escaped, at least for a brief period. As she spoke to other city employees, Filner reappeared, this time from behind, grabbing McKenzie around her shoulders, elbows atop her breasts, and began rubbing McKenzie's arms. The mayor told McKenzie's colleagues that he wanted to make her "employee of the day" and spoke of how "great" she was.
Months later, several more women began to come forward with similar allegations. Filner resigned amid the allegations. Women sued. The city settled some of the cases. But, as evidenced in the demurrer, the city is not ready to settle with all of the women.
Attorneys for McKenzie say Filner's actions amount to gender violence. In their argument, they use Civil Code 54.2 which states, in part, "...gender violence is a form of sex discrimination and means any of the following:...(2) A physical intrusion or physical invasion of a sexual nature under coercive conditions, whether or not those acts have resulted in criminal complaints, charges, prosecution, or conviction."
Judge Lewis will hear the city's demurrer at an 8:30 a.m. hearing on February 13 in Department 65.
Here's something you might be interested in.
I grazed her breast, so what?
Attorneys claim former mayor's actions amount to gender violence
I grazed her breast, so what?
Attorneys claim former mayor's actions amount to gender violence
Bob Filner
Technically, former mayor Bob Filner may have touched city employee Stacy McKenzie's breasts, but it was an "inadvertent, unintentional grazing of [her] breasts," with his elbow.
That's the crux of the city's argument as to why McKenzie's lawsuit doesn't hold water.
On February 13, the city will present their argument to Superior Court judge Joan M. Lewis.
The demurrer, essentially a “so what” in legal speak, debunks McKenzie's claims that Filner's hug from behind, his rubbing of her arm, and the elbow resting atop her breasts, is not evidence of gender violence or sexual battery.
"...[There are] no allegations whatsoever in the [first amended complaint] that Filner ever made or attempted contact with Plaintiff's sexual organ, anus, groin, or buttocks," reads the city's demurrer. "And, in regard to Plaintiff's breasts, the only thing Plaintiff alleges is that when Filner was embracing Plaintiff from behind on the one alleged occasion, with his arm around her neck and shoulder, his elbow happened to rest on top of her breasts. There is no allegation that Filner purposely touched her breasts or that, through his actions, he was intentionally making or trying to make contact with her breasts. An inadvertent, unintentional grazing of Plaintiff's breasts with an elbow is not enough to constitute sexual battery."
The complaint, filed in December 2013, alleged that then-mayor Filner made unwarranted advances on McKenzie, a longtime Parks and Recreation Dept. employee, during an event at Fiesta Island. McKenzie says that after a brief introduction, Filner approached her and asked her if she wanted to go on a date with him. McKenzie escaped, at least for a brief period. As she spoke to other city employees, Filner reappeared, this time from behind, grabbing McKenzie around her shoulders, elbows atop her breasts, and began rubbing McKenzie's arms. The mayor told McKenzie's colleagues that he wanted to make her "employee of the day" and spoke of how "great" she was.
Months later, several more women began to come forward with similar allegations. Filner resigned amid the allegations. Women sued. The city settled some of the cases. But, as evidenced in the demurrer, the city is not ready to settle with all of the women.
Attorneys for McKenzie say Filner's actions amount to gender violence. In their argument, they use Civil Code 54.2 which states, in part, "...gender violence is a form of sex discrimination and means any of the following:...(2) A physical intrusion or physical invasion of a sexual nature under coercive conditions, whether or not those acts have resulted in criminal complaints, charges, prosecution, or conviction."
Judge Lewis will hear the city's demurrer at an 8:30 a.m. hearing on February 13 in Department 65.
Comments