Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Bounty-hunters from L.A. bug UCSD music pirates
Hundreds of cease-and-desist notices charge unauthorized content distribution
Taylor Swift would approve
Illegal file-sharing, long a problem at UCSD, is still going on, subjecting students and faculty to big-dollar jeopardy.
So says an August 18 campus warning posted online by the school's director of academic computing and media services, Jeff Henry.
"If you are trying to get songs, movies, anime, software, or other copyrighted content for free using peer-to-peer software, such as uTorrent, Popcorn Time, FrostWire, Transmission, or Vuze, BEWARE: the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material, including peer-to-peer file sharing, is illegal and may put you at risk for civil and criminal liabilities," says Henry's alert.
Hundreds of copyright violations
"Copyright agencies continue to send UC San Diego hundreds of cease and desist notices regarding the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted content, mostly through peer-to-peer programs such as Bit Torrent."
Adds the warning: "Each of these notices carries the potential for a lawsuit and penalties in the thousands of dollars."
According to the post, "Copyright agencies actively monitor activity from all public UC San Diego networks, including UCSD-PROTECTED, ResNet, UCSD-GUEST, Eduroam, and the VPN."
In addition to risking the wrath of copyright owners, "students who receive a notice have their devices blocked temporarily and must attend a presentation on file sharing and copyright law."
Repeat student violators can expect fines between $150 and $300, with sanctions for faculty and staff "determined by their department," according to Henry’s notice.
$150,000 in fines for each student
Policing of copyright infringement has become a growing business nationally.
A Santa Monica–based outfit called Rightscorp, used by Taylor Swift and other pop stars, emails student violators with a warning that they face $150,000 fines, according to a March report by USA Today about internet abuse at New York's Columbia University.
“We fulfill our responsibility by taking appropriate action when we receive an infringement notice," Columbia spokesman Robert Hornsby told the paper.
Last November, Ohio State University's student newspaper, the Lantern, revealed that the school's wireless internet service had been widely abused by student pirates.
“I know two people who were caught and accused of pirating," an unnamed student told the paper. "One was warned by OSU Wireless that their activity had been detected. The other is off campus and is in an initial legal battle with the content owner."
Rightscorp's most recent quarterly report, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission August 14, explains that "In return for the right to pursue copyright infringers, we pay the copyright holders a percentage of the revenue collected based on agreements with them entered prior to our notices being sent to infringers."
The company's disclosure says that "For the three months ended June 30, 2015, we paid $116,908 to copyright holders, or approximately 50% of collected revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, we paid $125,740 to copyright holders, also approximately 50% of revenues."
The firm's legal bills, according to the document, "totaled $579,780 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $122,190 for the three months ended June 30, 2014, related to certain legal actions taken against the Company."
Here's something you might be interested in.
Bounty-hunters from L.A. bug UCSD music pirates
Hundreds of cease-and-desist notices charge unauthorized content distribution
Bounty-hunters from L.A. bug UCSD music pirates
Hundreds of cease-and-desist notices charge unauthorized content distribution
Taylor Swift would approve
Illegal file-sharing, long a problem at UCSD, is still going on, subjecting students and faculty to big-dollar jeopardy.
So says an August 18 campus warning posted online by the school's director of academic computing and media services, Jeff Henry.
"If you are trying to get songs, movies, anime, software, or other copyrighted content for free using peer-to-peer software, such as uTorrent, Popcorn Time, FrostWire, Transmission, or Vuze, BEWARE: the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material, including peer-to-peer file sharing, is illegal and may put you at risk for civil and criminal liabilities," says Henry's alert.
Hundreds of copyright violations
"Copyright agencies continue to send UC San Diego hundreds of cease and desist notices regarding the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted content, mostly through peer-to-peer programs such as Bit Torrent."
Adds the warning: "Each of these notices carries the potential for a lawsuit and penalties in the thousands of dollars."
According to the post, "Copyright agencies actively monitor activity from all public UC San Diego networks, including UCSD-PROTECTED, ResNet, UCSD-GUEST, Eduroam, and the VPN."
In addition to risking the wrath of copyright owners, "students who receive a notice have their devices blocked temporarily and must attend a presentation on file sharing and copyright law."
Repeat student violators can expect fines between $150 and $300, with sanctions for faculty and staff "determined by their department," according to Henry’s notice.
$150,000 in fines for each student
Policing of copyright infringement has become a growing business nationally.
A Santa Monica–based outfit called Rightscorp, used by Taylor Swift and other pop stars, emails student violators with a warning that they face $150,000 fines, according to a March report by USA Today about internet abuse at New York's Columbia University.
“We fulfill our responsibility by taking appropriate action when we receive an infringement notice," Columbia spokesman Robert Hornsby told the paper.
Last November, Ohio State University's student newspaper, the Lantern, revealed that the school's wireless internet service had been widely abused by student pirates.
“I know two people who were caught and accused of pirating," an unnamed student told the paper. "One was warned by OSU Wireless that their activity had been detected. The other is off campus and is in an initial legal battle with the content owner."
Rightscorp's most recent quarterly report, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission August 14, explains that "In return for the right to pursue copyright infringers, we pay the copyright holders a percentage of the revenue collected based on agreements with them entered prior to our notices being sent to infringers."
The company's disclosure says that "For the three months ended June 30, 2015, we paid $116,908 to copyright holders, or approximately 50% of collected revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, we paid $125,740 to copyright holders, also approximately 50% of revenues."
The firm's legal bills, according to the document, "totaled $579,780 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $122,190 for the three months ended June 30, 2014, related to certain legal actions taken against the Company."
Comments