Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Tasering the competition
Conflicts of interest and Sheriff Gore’s costly shopping spree
Taser's Axon Body camera goes for $399
Sheriff Bill Gore is out shopping for body cameras just as the provider of the costly electronic devices to San Diego police is coming in for a sizable dose of national scrutiny.
A March 20 solicitation from the county's purchasing office says it is "seeking proposals for a body-worn camera system (to include camera, related accessories and storage solution) for the Sheriff's Department.”
Adds the document, “The goals of deploying the system are: (1) to provide greater transparency/accountability in daily interactions between the Sheriff's deputies and citizens and (2) to provide more conclusive evidence to reduce false allegations and civil liability claims against the County.”
The Axon Flex costs $599
The county estimates that "2,100 body-worn cameras and all related accessories in the first year will be purchased, plus on-going related maintenance and support services anticipated through a total term of five years.”
According to the request for proposals, "the County estimates it will collect 500,000 hours of video annually and it will need to be stored for three years.”
No final cost is estimated, but the massive size of the lucrative contract is expected to attract interest from a number of major bidders; one in particular may have a head start, thanks to its close relationship with the San Diego Police Department.
The city won the race for installing local cop cameras, along with lots of positive publicity, by hooking up with Arizona-based Taser International last year. The company has since become a focus of media scrutiny for showering jobs and free trips on law-enforcement officials who back the company's products.
Taser "has cultivated financial ties to police chiefs whose departments have bought the recording devices, raising conflict-of-interest questions," a according to a March 3 Associated Press account.
"Over the past 18 months, Taser has reached consulting agreements with two such chiefs weeks after they retired, and it is in talks with a third who also backed the purchase of its products, the AP has learned. Taser is planning to send two of them to speak at luxury hotels in Australia and the United Arab Emirates in March at events where they will address other law enforcement officers considering body cameras."
In San Diego, notes a February report in USA Today, "City Council President Pro Tem Marti Emerald said the city approved a nearly $1 million sole-source contract with Taser last year because it offered a potential 'solution' to a public safety problem."
According to USA Today, "Emerald said the city considered other providers, including Seattle-based Vievu. But she said Taser offered a product that 'meets our need.' Following a field trial of the Taser cameras, the city's purchasing officials recommended approval because of 'unique' functions of the Taser device that were 'deemed a necessity,' according to city documents."
A March 3 update from the San Diego Police Department to the council regarding the status of the body-camera contract notes, "Three hundred cameras were purchased from Taser International at the end of fiscal year 2014. An additional three hundred cameras were purchased in fiscal year 2015.”
Adds the document, "The contract with Taser International specifies four hundred additional cameras to be purchased in fiscal year 2016."
Here's something you might be interested in.
Tasering the competition
Conflicts of interest and Sheriff Gore’s costly shopping spree
Tasering the competition
Conflicts of interest and Sheriff Gore’s costly shopping spree
Taser's Axon Body camera goes for $399
Sheriff Bill Gore is out shopping for body cameras just as the provider of the costly electronic devices to San Diego police is coming in for a sizable dose of national scrutiny.
A March 20 solicitation from the county's purchasing office says it is "seeking proposals for a body-worn camera system (to include camera, related accessories and storage solution) for the Sheriff's Department.”
Adds the document, “The goals of deploying the system are: (1) to provide greater transparency/accountability in daily interactions between the Sheriff's deputies and citizens and (2) to provide more conclusive evidence to reduce false allegations and civil liability claims against the County.”
The Axon Flex costs $599
The county estimates that "2,100 body-worn cameras and all related accessories in the first year will be purchased, plus on-going related maintenance and support services anticipated through a total term of five years.”
According to the request for proposals, "the County estimates it will collect 500,000 hours of video annually and it will need to be stored for three years.”
No final cost is estimated, but the massive size of the lucrative contract is expected to attract interest from a number of major bidders; one in particular may have a head start, thanks to its close relationship with the San Diego Police Department.
The city won the race for installing local cop cameras, along with lots of positive publicity, by hooking up with Arizona-based Taser International last year. The company has since become a focus of media scrutiny for showering jobs and free trips on law-enforcement officials who back the company's products.
Taser "has cultivated financial ties to police chiefs whose departments have bought the recording devices, raising conflict-of-interest questions," a according to a March 3 Associated Press account.
"Over the past 18 months, Taser has reached consulting agreements with two such chiefs weeks after they retired, and it is in talks with a third who also backed the purchase of its products, the AP has learned. Taser is planning to send two of them to speak at luxury hotels in Australia and the United Arab Emirates in March at events where they will address other law enforcement officers considering body cameras."
In San Diego, notes a February report in USA Today, "City Council President Pro Tem Marti Emerald said the city approved a nearly $1 million sole-source contract with Taser last year because it offered a potential 'solution' to a public safety problem."
According to USA Today, "Emerald said the city considered other providers, including Seattle-based Vievu. But she said Taser offered a product that 'meets our need.' Following a field trial of the Taser cameras, the city's purchasing officials recommended approval because of 'unique' functions of the Taser device that were 'deemed a necessity,' according to city documents."
A March 3 update from the San Diego Police Department to the council regarding the status of the body-camera contract notes, "Three hundred cameras were purchased from Taser International at the end of fiscal year 2014. An additional three hundred cameras were purchased in fiscal year 2015.”
Adds the document, "The contract with Taser International specifies four hundred additional cameras to be purchased in fiscal year 2016."
Comments