Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
U-T San Diego circulation drops
Print edition has low market share
Every year, newspapers and other publications have to report circulation figures to the United States Postal Service. This October, U-T San Diego reported more declines.
In October of last year, the seven-day paid circulation of the print edition through Sept. 13, 2013 was 189,822; this year, that figure dropped to 182,083 for the year through Sept. 21. Last year, the paid circulation on Sunday, September 15, was 251,318; this year's paid circulation for Sunday, September 21, was down to 233,109.
These are weak numbers, considering that there are 3.1 million people in the county and about 1.07 million households.
On Tuesday, October 28, data from the Alliance for Audited Media (formerly Audit Bureau of Circulations) will be released. These data include digital and branded numbers — not just the print edition, as the U.S. Postal Service reports. The last Alliance for Audited Media report, for the six-month period ended March 31 of this year, showed the U-T's circulation dropping.
Last year, U-T San Diego cooperated with the Reader on the postal service numbers; this year they did not.
Here's something you might be interested in.
U-T San Diego circulation drops
Print edition has low market share
U-T San Diego circulation drops
Print edition has low market share
Every year, newspapers and other publications have to report circulation figures to the United States Postal Service. This October, U-T San Diego reported more declines.
In October of last year, the seven-day paid circulation of the print edition through Sept. 13, 2013 was 189,822; this year, that figure dropped to 182,083 for the year through Sept. 21. Last year, the paid circulation on Sunday, September 15, was 251,318; this year's paid circulation for Sunday, September 21, was down to 233,109.
These are weak numbers, considering that there are 3.1 million people in the county and about 1.07 million households.
On Tuesday, October 28, data from the Alliance for Audited Media (formerly Audit Bureau of Circulations) will be released. These data include digital and branded numbers — not just the print edition, as the U.S. Postal Service reports. The last Alliance for Audited Media report, for the six-month period ended March 31 of this year, showed the U-T's circulation dropping.
Last year, U-T San Diego cooperated with the Reader on the postal service numbers; this year they did not.
Comments