Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
From innocence to evil
Thrill Me at Diversionary a solid effort with a tricky piece
Thrill Me at Diversionary Theatre
Leopold and Loeb: the dark-eyed, slick-haired, “thrill killers” of 1924 could have posed for Arrow shirt ads. Nathan Leopold, 19, and Richard Loeb, 18, were intelligent lawyers-to-be. Leopold had a 210 IQ and claimed to speak 27 languages fluently; Loeb read Nietzche, identified with his “superman.”
According to legend, Loeb was the instigator. For reasons pondered ever since, Loeb said he needed an accomplice.
Loeb murdered 14-year-old Bobby Franks, he said, to commit the perfect crime and prove their superiority — if only to each other. This suggests they had some kind of bond: mental, emotional, or, though not mentioned at the time, sexual.
Legend says Leopold’s judgment “was that of a child.” Thirty-three years later, Leopold confessed he “would have done anything [Loeb] asked.”
Before proceedings began, Clarence Darrow had both plead guilty to avoid a jury trial. Because the “boys” grew up on a post-World War age, Darrow argued, they suffered mental illness. They killed Franks “as they might a spider or a fly, for the experience. They killed him because they were made that way.”
Each got life plus 99 years.
Stephen Dolginoff’s musical, Thrill Me, begins in Joliet Prison in 1958. Leopold will go before his parole board for the fifth time (Loeb was murdered by a former cell-mate in 1936). As he pleads his case, flashbacks re-tell the story.
The script plays uneven. It wavers between facile explanations — master/slave control issues; all for love — and an eerie escalation from innocence to evil. The best scenes happen after the crime. As evidence builds, Leopold and Loeb’s above-the-law superiority gets shaken, and their “bond” slowly unravels.
The 80-minute piece concludes with a twist as ironic as it is unbelievable — given what leads up to it and the known history of the subjects. The actor making the flip-flop needs to prepare for it better early on and sell it much more convincingly.
Doglinoff’s score has won awards, but most of the 17 songs repeat a staccato phrase, over and over. A plus for Diversionary: Tony Houck’s backup piano drives the songs, and the show, forward.
Although the sound design could use a level-check, Erick Sundquist’s costumes — white shirts, black pants and vests — give the pair a distinctive look. And Conor Mulligan’s shadows, horizontal reds, noire effects rank among the best lighting designs I’ve seen at Diversionary.
As Loeb, Scott Nickley makes up in intensity what the script lacks in depth (his opening macabre “dance,” choreographed by Michael Mizeraney, sets a stunning tone). Michael Parrott gives Leopold a strong singing voice (especially renditions of “Way Too Far”) but tends to indicate emotionally.
Bret Young designed the set — red brick wall, low platform like a prison cell, cold, metallic feel throughout — and directed for the first time. Except for places that lapse into camp (they’re in the script), it’s a solid effort with a tricky piece.
But somewhere else. On opening night, it was hard to keep a sad fact from intruding: after 15 years of deep dedication, Young is leaving Diversionary. He has done every job, performed miles beyond the call of every duty, and has literally been the glue of the company.
Best wishes to this man in whatever he chooses, which should include directing!
Here's something you might be interested in.
From innocence to evil
Thrill Me at Diversionary a solid effort with a tricky piece
From innocence to evil
Thrill Me at Diversionary a solid effort with a tricky piece
Thrill Me at Diversionary Theatre
Leopold and Loeb: the dark-eyed, slick-haired, “thrill killers” of 1924 could have posed for Arrow shirt ads. Nathan Leopold, 19, and Richard Loeb, 18, were intelligent lawyers-to-be. Leopold had a 210 IQ and claimed to speak 27 languages fluently; Loeb read Nietzche, identified with his “superman.”
According to legend, Loeb was the instigator. For reasons pondered ever since, Loeb said he needed an accomplice.
Loeb murdered 14-year-old Bobby Franks, he said, to commit the perfect crime and prove their superiority — if only to each other. This suggests they had some kind of bond: mental, emotional, or, though not mentioned at the time, sexual.
Legend says Leopold’s judgment “was that of a child.” Thirty-three years later, Leopold confessed he “would have done anything [Loeb] asked.”
Before proceedings began, Clarence Darrow had both plead guilty to avoid a jury trial. Because the “boys” grew up on a post-World War age, Darrow argued, they suffered mental illness. They killed Franks “as they might a spider or a fly, for the experience. They killed him because they were made that way.”
Each got life plus 99 years.
Stephen Dolginoff’s musical, Thrill Me, begins in Joliet Prison in 1958. Leopold will go before his parole board for the fifth time (Loeb was murdered by a former cell-mate in 1936). As he pleads his case, flashbacks re-tell the story.
The script plays uneven. It wavers between facile explanations — master/slave control issues; all for love — and an eerie escalation from innocence to evil. The best scenes happen after the crime. As evidence builds, Leopold and Loeb’s above-the-law superiority gets shaken, and their “bond” slowly unravels.
The 80-minute piece concludes with a twist as ironic as it is unbelievable — given what leads up to it and the known history of the subjects. The actor making the flip-flop needs to prepare for it better early on and sell it much more convincingly.
Doglinoff’s score has won awards, but most of the 17 songs repeat a staccato phrase, over and over. A plus for Diversionary: Tony Houck’s backup piano drives the songs, and the show, forward.
Although the sound design could use a level-check, Erick Sundquist’s costumes — white shirts, black pants and vests — give the pair a distinctive look. And Conor Mulligan’s shadows, horizontal reds, noire effects rank among the best lighting designs I’ve seen at Diversionary.
As Loeb, Scott Nickley makes up in intensity what the script lacks in depth (his opening macabre “dance,” choreographed by Michael Mizeraney, sets a stunning tone). Michael Parrott gives Leopold a strong singing voice (especially renditions of “Way Too Far”) but tends to indicate emotionally.
Bret Young designed the set — red brick wall, low platform like a prison cell, cold, metallic feel throughout — and directed for the first time. Except for places that lapse into camp (they’re in the script), it’s a solid effort with a tricky piece.
But somewhere else. On opening night, it was hard to keep a sad fact from intruding: after 15 years of deep dedication, Young is leaving Diversionary. He has done every job, performed miles beyond the call of every duty, and has literally been the glue of the company.
Best wishes to this man in whatever he chooses, which should include directing!
Comments