Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
SD’s Tourism Marketing District’s odd strategy
Boardmembers expected to approve expenditure to file brief in case in Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga
What better way to promote San Diego than for the Tourism Marketing District to pay attorneys to file legal briefs in other cities’ fights to keep their hotel tax up and running?
On March 7, San Diego's Tourism Marketing boardmembers are expected to direct Sacramento-based law firm Colantuono and Levin to file an "amicus brief" in favor of dismissing a case from the Inland Oversight Committee against the cities of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga, which questioned the legality of the Greater Ontario Tourism Marketing District.
The amicus brief allows for third parties — in this case, San Diego's Tourism Marketing District — to give their two cents on the case, oftentimes in favor of one of the parties involved.
The lawsuit, filed in July of last year, was brought by local attorney Cory Briggs on behalf of his client, the Inland Oversight Committee — Briggs also has a law office in Upland. And, similar to Briggs’s December 2012 complaint filed against San Diego's Tourism Marketing District, the lawsuit against Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga challenges the legality of taxing hotel guests in order to pay to promote tourism. The problem, at least one of them, is that the tax is approved not by the electorate but by the largest hotel owners in the proposed district.
San Diego's Tourism Marketing Corporation has decided to chime in, hoping that an earlier ruling by judge Joseph Brisco — which stated that the plaintiff must represent one of the assessed hotels in order for the lawsuit to be valid — stands.
Briggs argues that because the hotel tax is a tax, any member of the electorate has a right to sue.
And while impacts from the case in Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga could be felt in San Diego, questions have arisen as to the expenditure of tax dollars to file legal briefs in another county.
"How does spending San Diego tourism money on a lawsuit involving third parties in another county help promote San Diego tourism?” asked Briggs. "If the Tourism Marketing District can justify spending San Diego tourism taxes in a Riverside courtroom as good for San Diego hotels, that'd be the legal equivalent of pulling a rabbit out of a hat. They'll try. But all the adults watching will know it's b.s."
Boardmembers for San Diego's Tourism Marketing District will discuss the item during their March 7 meeting. Lorin Stewart, president of the Tourism Marketing District, did not return a message asking how much the amicus brief will cost.
Here's something you might be interested in.
SD’s Tourism Marketing District’s odd strategy
Boardmembers expected to approve expenditure to file brief in case in Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga
SD’s Tourism Marketing District’s odd strategy
Boardmembers expected to approve expenditure to file brief in case in Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga
What better way to promote San Diego than for the Tourism Marketing District to pay attorneys to file legal briefs in other cities’ fights to keep their hotel tax up and running?
On March 7, San Diego's Tourism Marketing boardmembers are expected to direct Sacramento-based law firm Colantuono and Levin to file an "amicus brief" in favor of dismissing a case from the Inland Oversight Committee against the cities of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga, which questioned the legality of the Greater Ontario Tourism Marketing District.
The amicus brief allows for third parties — in this case, San Diego's Tourism Marketing District — to give their two cents on the case, oftentimes in favor of one of the parties involved.
The lawsuit, filed in July of last year, was brought by local attorney Cory Briggs on behalf of his client, the Inland Oversight Committee — Briggs also has a law office in Upland. And, similar to Briggs’s December 2012 complaint filed against San Diego's Tourism Marketing District, the lawsuit against Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga challenges the legality of taxing hotel guests in order to pay to promote tourism. The problem, at least one of them, is that the tax is approved not by the electorate but by the largest hotel owners in the proposed district.
San Diego's Tourism Marketing Corporation has decided to chime in, hoping that an earlier ruling by judge Joseph Brisco — which stated that the plaintiff must represent one of the assessed hotels in order for the lawsuit to be valid — stands.
Briggs argues that because the hotel tax is a tax, any member of the electorate has a right to sue.
And while impacts from the case in Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga could be felt in San Diego, questions have arisen as to the expenditure of tax dollars to file legal briefs in another county.
"How does spending San Diego tourism money on a lawsuit involving third parties in another county help promote San Diego tourism?” asked Briggs. "If the Tourism Marketing District can justify spending San Diego tourism taxes in a Riverside courtroom as good for San Diego hotels, that'd be the legal equivalent of pulling a rabbit out of a hat. They'll try. But all the adults watching will know it's b.s."
Boardmembers for San Diego's Tourism Marketing District will discuss the item during their March 7 meeting. Lorin Stewart, president of the Tourism Marketing District, did not return a message asking how much the amicus brief will cost.
Comments