Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Utilities commission was cozy with utility
Pacific Gas gets love letters from state regulators
Michael Peevey
The publication SFGate revealed yesterday (July 26) just how cozy officials of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) are with the utilities they are supposed to regulate.
The City of San Bruno, which suffered a 2010 gas-pipeline explosion that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes, sued the CPUC for not releasing the emails. San Bruno has justifiably blasted the CPUC for its lax regulation of the offending utility, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E).
As a result of the suit, 7000 previously protected emails were released. San Bruno officials say they are proof of a "cozy relationship" between the CPUC and the Bay Area utility. (The National Transportation Safety Board noted there was a "culture of complacency" at the regulatory body that was supposed to ensure that PG&E operated pipelines safely.)
These emails show more than complacency. In a series of emails, the chief of staff to CPUC president Michael Peevey wrote a PG&E official on how the company could handle a demand from San Bruno. The chief of staff told PG&E to send San Bruno a "sweet note," and tell the city that the matter in dispute was moot. "And then wait for them to throw a fit," said the chief of staff. The PG&E official replied, "Love you."
On another occasion, Peevey told PG&E's vice president of regulatory affairs that he had erred in saying publicly that the company expected to be criminally charged. "Anticipating all this only meant the public got to read two big stories rather than one,” Peevey told the executive. "I think this was inept." Why should the head of the CPUC be worried about a utility's public relations acuity? It's obvious why.
San Bruno says PG&E had sent confidential financial information to the CPUC, apparently trying to show that a financial penalty for the San Bruno disaster would hurt the company.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Utilities commission was cozy with utility
Pacific Gas gets love letters from state regulators
Utilities commission was cozy with utility
Pacific Gas gets love letters from state regulators
Michael Peevey
The publication SFGate revealed yesterday (July 26) just how cozy officials of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) are with the utilities they are supposed to regulate.
The City of San Bruno, which suffered a 2010 gas-pipeline explosion that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes, sued the CPUC for not releasing the emails. San Bruno has justifiably blasted the CPUC for its lax regulation of the offending utility, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E).
As a result of the suit, 7000 previously protected emails were released. San Bruno officials say they are proof of a "cozy relationship" between the CPUC and the Bay Area utility. (The National Transportation Safety Board noted there was a "culture of complacency" at the regulatory body that was supposed to ensure that PG&E operated pipelines safely.)
These emails show more than complacency. In a series of emails, the chief of staff to CPUC president Michael Peevey wrote a PG&E official on how the company could handle a demand from San Bruno. The chief of staff told PG&E to send San Bruno a "sweet note," and tell the city that the matter in dispute was moot. "And then wait for them to throw a fit," said the chief of staff. The PG&E official replied, "Love you."
On another occasion, Peevey told PG&E's vice president of regulatory affairs that he had erred in saying publicly that the company expected to be criminally charged. "Anticipating all this only meant the public got to read two big stories rather than one,” Peevey told the executive. "I think this was inept." Why should the head of the CPUC be worried about a utility's public relations acuity? It's obvious why.
San Bruno says PG&E had sent confidential financial information to the CPUC, apparently trying to show that a financial penalty for the San Bruno disaster would hurt the company.
Comments