Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Pfingst and murder defendant win pre-trial hearings
Former San Diego County DA took evidence cash as "fee"
Julie Harper, Paul Pfingst
Former San Diego district attorney, current criminal defense lawyer Paul Pfingst will remain as counsel for a woman accused of murdering her husband, a judge ruled on January 3.
In November, prosecutor Keith Watanabe alleged that Pfingst had handled evidence in the case, specifically a “get-away-bag,” and that Pfingst advised the defendant’s father to “secret” that evidence.
On January 3, superior-court judge Blaine Bowman declared “there is no actual conflict” and “there is no potential conflict” and “there is not even an appearance of conflict.”
The court responded to a prosecutor’s request to decide if there might be conflict if the defense attorney was called as a witness during the same murder trial.
Watanabe suggested in written motions that if a judge did find conflict, Pfingst could be removed as defense counsel.
Defendant Julie Harper has been present for all hearings on the matter and was repeatedly asked if she wanted Pfingst to remain as her counsel; she told the judge that she did.
Harper was taken into custody in August 2012, suspected in the killing of her husband, Jason; in September of 2013, a premium of $200,000 was paid to post her $2 million bond and the defendant is now at liberty.
Keith Watanabe
Before the judge ruled, Watanabe unexpectedly reversed his previous position and stated that he would not call Paul Pfingst as a witness during the upcoming trial. Jury selection is expected to begin in April 2014.
Judge Bowman opined that Pfingst’s alleged actions — removing cash from the “get-away-bag” and directing the defendant’s father to place the bag in a garage attic — were “not misconduct” but instead “overzealous defense of his client.”
The prosecutor claimed in court that Pfingst or his agent removed more than $16,000 cash from the “get-away-bag” and retained that amount. “It’s our fee,” attorney Paul Pfingst explained.
After the January 3 hearing, Pfingst made a statement: “It is sad to watch how petty and political that office has become. Any competent lawyer would have immediately seen that all of the evidence was properly handled.”
Here's something you might be interested in.
Pfingst and murder defendant win pre-trial hearings
Former San Diego County DA took evidence cash as "fee"
Pfingst and murder defendant win pre-trial hearings
Former San Diego County DA took evidence cash as "fee"
Julie Harper, Paul Pfingst
Former San Diego district attorney, current criminal defense lawyer Paul Pfingst will remain as counsel for a woman accused of murdering her husband, a judge ruled on January 3.
In November, prosecutor Keith Watanabe alleged that Pfingst had handled evidence in the case, specifically a “get-away-bag,” and that Pfingst advised the defendant’s father to “secret” that evidence.
On January 3, superior-court judge Blaine Bowman declared “there is no actual conflict” and “there is no potential conflict” and “there is not even an appearance of conflict.”
The court responded to a prosecutor’s request to decide if there might be conflict if the defense attorney was called as a witness during the same murder trial.
Watanabe suggested in written motions that if a judge did find conflict, Pfingst could be removed as defense counsel.
Defendant Julie Harper has been present for all hearings on the matter and was repeatedly asked if she wanted Pfingst to remain as her counsel; she told the judge that she did.
Harper was taken into custody in August 2012, suspected in the killing of her husband, Jason; in September of 2013, a premium of $200,000 was paid to post her $2 million bond and the defendant is now at liberty.
Keith Watanabe
Before the judge ruled, Watanabe unexpectedly reversed his previous position and stated that he would not call Paul Pfingst as a witness during the upcoming trial. Jury selection is expected to begin in April 2014.
Judge Bowman opined that Pfingst’s alleged actions — removing cash from the “get-away-bag” and directing the defendant’s father to place the bag in a garage attic — were “not misconduct” but instead “overzealous defense of his client.”
The prosecutor claimed in court that Pfingst or his agent removed more than $16,000 cash from the “get-away-bag” and retained that amount. “It’s our fee,” attorney Paul Pfingst explained.
After the January 3 hearing, Pfingst made a statement: “It is sad to watch how petty and political that office has become. Any competent lawyer would have immediately seen that all of the evidence was properly handled.”
Comments