Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Florida nuclear power plant in San Onofre's footsteps?
Damage to generator caused concern — not enough for shutdown
As the decommissioning process continues at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, a scenario similar to the one that led to the power plant’s demise is unfolding about halfway between Orlando and Miami.
In 2007, Florida Power & Light installed two new steam generators at its St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant at a cost of $140 million (a fraction of the nearly $700 million spent at San Onofre). The new generators were supposed to remain in service until the reactor's scheduled retirement in 2043.
When the plant shut down in 2009 for maintenance and refueling, however, 2000 of the 18,000 metal tubes that compose the generators showed damage at over 5800 locations. Because each tube is 70 feet long, they may have abnormal wear or damage observed at more than one location.
The damage observed was at the time the worst on record for the nuclear industry — until a tube burst at San Onofre's Unit 3 generator, releasing a small amount of radiation into the atmosphere. Inspectors there found 10,284 damaged tubing sections along 1806 total damaged tubes. San Onofre's Unit 2 generator, which was shut down for maintenance at the time, was also inspected and found to be heavily damaged.
Florida Power & Light took a different approach than San Onofre operator Southern California Edison — they put the reactors back online and turned up the juice, generating even more power than before. In 2011, the Florida plant again shut down for maintenance and inspection; the damage was 46 percent more severe, with nearly 3000 tubes showing damage at over 8600 locations.
Officials at Florida Power & Light argue that their design should not be compared to San Onofre (St. Lucie's generators were supplied by the French firm AREVA; San Onofre's by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries), though that's exactly what Edison did during their ultimately unsuccessful attempt to gain permission to resume operations in San Diego. St. Lucie was identified as "the next closest plant with a high number of wear indications," according to a Tampa Bay Times report.
Power generation at St. Lucie has been bumped by another 12 percent since generators there were last inspected in November 2012. The next shutdown and inspection is scheduled for next month, when experts fear they could find even further deterioration in the steam generators that are hoped to last for another three decades.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Florida nuclear power plant in San Onofre's footsteps?
Damage to generator caused concern — not enough for shutdown
Florida nuclear power plant in San Onofre's footsteps?
Damage to generator caused concern — not enough for shutdown
As the decommissioning process continues at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, a scenario similar to the one that led to the power plant’s demise is unfolding about halfway between Orlando and Miami.
In 2007, Florida Power & Light installed two new steam generators at its St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant at a cost of $140 million (a fraction of the nearly $700 million spent at San Onofre). The new generators were supposed to remain in service until the reactor's scheduled retirement in 2043.
When the plant shut down in 2009 for maintenance and refueling, however, 2000 of the 18,000 metal tubes that compose the generators showed damage at over 5800 locations. Because each tube is 70 feet long, they may have abnormal wear or damage observed at more than one location.
The damage observed was at the time the worst on record for the nuclear industry — until a tube burst at San Onofre's Unit 3 generator, releasing a small amount of radiation into the atmosphere. Inspectors there found 10,284 damaged tubing sections along 1806 total damaged tubes. San Onofre's Unit 2 generator, which was shut down for maintenance at the time, was also inspected and found to be heavily damaged.
Florida Power & Light took a different approach than San Onofre operator Southern California Edison — they put the reactors back online and turned up the juice, generating even more power than before. In 2011, the Florida plant again shut down for maintenance and inspection; the damage was 46 percent more severe, with nearly 3000 tubes showing damage at over 8600 locations.
Officials at Florida Power & Light argue that their design should not be compared to San Onofre (St. Lucie's generators were supplied by the French firm AREVA; San Onofre's by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries), though that's exactly what Edison did during their ultimately unsuccessful attempt to gain permission to resume operations in San Diego. St. Lucie was identified as "the next closest plant with a high number of wear indications," according to a Tampa Bay Times report.
Power generation at St. Lucie has been bumped by another 12 percent since generators there were last inspected in November 2012. The next shutdown and inspection is scheduled for next month, when experts fear they could find even further deterioration in the steam generators that are hoped to last for another three decades.
Comments