Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Goldsmith to argue against his own legal opinion
Last year’s Filner fracas has city attorney on slippery slope
Jan Goldsmith
City attorney Jan Goldsmith and his lawyers must turn over closed-session transcripts from last year's [public feud][1] with then-mayor Bob Filner to Superior Court judge Richard Strauss to determine what, if anything, will be released publicly.
Andrew Jones
Over one year has passed since a feud erupted between Goldsmith, his top attorneys, and Filner. The spat spilled over into closed-session meetings. In April of last year, former assistant city attorney Andrew Jones told reporters weeks after one run-in with Filner that the mayor had ordered him to the back of the room. He likened the experience to that of Rosa Parks’s famous bus ride.
One month later, Jones was sent back to represent the city attorney in closed session. Filner, frustrated by the Rosa Parks statement, accused Jones of leaking confidential information to the press. He ordered Jones out of the room. Jones refused and Filner then asked that a police officer remove the assistant city attorney. Three days transpired before Goldsmith's office released a redacted transcript from the meeting to reporters at 10News and the U-T.
Goldsmith's [decision][2] to release the confidential transcript was immediately questioned.
In addition to suspending future closed-session meetings, Goldsmith addressed those questions in a [July 1, 2013 memo][3].
"The mayor appears to be unaware that only communications related to the subject matter of the closed session are deemed confidential. Actions of personal abuse are not confidential by any stretch of the imagination."
The argument was made once again in a formal declaration from Andrew Jones sometime after the June 18 run-in — the declaration was not dated, nor was it signed by Jones.
In his statement, Jones alleged that Filner had verbally assaulted him and defended the decision to go to the press.
"Mayor Filner's previous demeaning demand that I 'go sit in the back of the room' was not a noticed issue for closed session discussion by council. There is nothing about that statement that is protected or confidential."
Weeks later, Goldsmith changed his tune. On July 13, his office refused to release redacted transcripts of the meeting when Filner ordered Jones to the back of the room.
Now, the city attorney must argue against his July 1, 2013, legal opinion in a [lawsuit filed by attorney Cory Briggs][4]. If he's not successful, the public will have an opportunity to see firsthand what occurred between Filner and Jones and whether the former Freedom Rider mayor made racist remarks to the assistant city attorney or whether the feud was an example of political showmanship.
Judge Strauss will make his final decision after reviewing the June 18 transcript. At that time, he will also decide whether to make the previous closed-session transcript public.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Goldsmith to argue against his own legal opinion
Last year’s Filner fracas has city attorney on slippery slope
Goldsmith to argue against his own legal opinion
Last year’s Filner fracas has city attorney on slippery slope
Jan Goldsmith
City attorney Jan Goldsmith and his lawyers must turn over closed-session transcripts from last year's [public feud][1] with then-mayor Bob Filner to Superior Court judge Richard Strauss to determine what, if anything, will be released publicly.
Andrew Jones
Over one year has passed since a feud erupted between Goldsmith, his top attorneys, and Filner. The spat spilled over into closed-session meetings. In April of last year, former assistant city attorney Andrew Jones told reporters weeks after one run-in with Filner that the mayor had ordered him to the back of the room. He likened the experience to that of Rosa Parks’s famous bus ride.
One month later, Jones was sent back to represent the city attorney in closed session. Filner, frustrated by the Rosa Parks statement, accused Jones of leaking confidential information to the press. He ordered Jones out of the room. Jones refused and Filner then asked that a police officer remove the assistant city attorney. Three days transpired before Goldsmith's office released a redacted transcript from the meeting to reporters at 10News and the U-T.
Goldsmith's [decision][2] to release the confidential transcript was immediately questioned.
In addition to suspending future closed-session meetings, Goldsmith addressed those questions in a [July 1, 2013 memo][3].
"The mayor appears to be unaware that only communications related to the subject matter of the closed session are deemed confidential. Actions of personal abuse are not confidential by any stretch of the imagination."
The argument was made once again in a formal declaration from Andrew Jones sometime after the June 18 run-in — the declaration was not dated, nor was it signed by Jones.
In his statement, Jones alleged that Filner had verbally assaulted him and defended the decision to go to the press.
"Mayor Filner's previous demeaning demand that I 'go sit in the back of the room' was not a noticed issue for closed session discussion by council. There is nothing about that statement that is protected or confidential."
Weeks later, Goldsmith changed his tune. On July 13, his office refused to release redacted transcripts of the meeting when Filner ordered Jones to the back of the room.
Now, the city attorney must argue against his July 1, 2013, legal opinion in a [lawsuit filed by attorney Cory Briggs][4]. If he's not successful, the public will have an opportunity to see firsthand what occurred between Filner and Jones and whether the former Freedom Rider mayor made racist remarks to the assistant city attorney or whether the feud was an example of political showmanship.
Judge Strauss will make his final decision after reviewing the June 18 transcript. At that time, he will also decide whether to make the previous closed-session transcript public.
Comments