Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Downtown Partnership denied taxpayer money to fight lawsuit
Litigation is over...um, misuse of taxpayer money
Jerry Sanders, Downtown Partnership CEO Kris Michell, Kevin Faulconer
The Downtown San Diego Partnership won't be able to dip into taxpayer funds to help pay for legal help needed to fight a lawsuit over mismanagement of the $5.5 million in annual revenues collected under the Property and Business Improvement District (PBID).
An October 11 email from Luis Ojeda, the person in charge of overseeing assessment districts for the city, denied the partnership's request to pay for legal fees using money collected as part of the Downtown PBID.
"We are deducting $5,000 from July 2013 request and $1,882.50 from August 2013 request (both for legal fees). Based on legal advice we received, all subsequent legal fees regarding [the] San Diegans for Open Government [case]...will not be reimbursed at this time," read the email from Ojeda, which the Reader obtained through a California Public Records Act request.
News of the rejection came one month after a September meeting at which PBID advisory board members approved setting aside $100,000 to hire Colantuono and Levin, a specialty law firm headquartered in Sacramento. (The same lawyers were hired to file suit against former mayor Bob Filner in an attempt to force the release of Tourism Marketing District dollars.)
The suit from watchdog group San Diegans for Open Government was filed in August of this year and accuses the partnership of having free rein to spend money collected from property owners in the five downtown neighborhoods that make up the downtown PBID.
Critics of the private/non-profit organization claim head of the partnership (and former chief of staff for Jerry Sanders), Kris Michell, and the board of directors have had an open mind when interpreting the law governing assessment districts. That interpretation has allowed them to open the checkbook for goals such as ridding downtown streets of panhandlers, preventing public urination, or any other issue said to "detract from the business being conducted" in San Diego's downtown neighborhoods.
The partnership has also directed taxpayer revenues to pay for the organization's new business plan, the Downtown Partnership's new logo, and their fresh new website.
The next hearing is set for November 22 with superior court judge Ronald Styn.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Downtown Partnership denied taxpayer money to fight lawsuit
Litigation is over...um, misuse of taxpayer money
Downtown Partnership denied taxpayer money to fight lawsuit
Litigation is over...um, misuse of taxpayer money
Jerry Sanders, Downtown Partnership CEO Kris Michell, Kevin Faulconer
The Downtown San Diego Partnership won't be able to dip into taxpayer funds to help pay for legal help needed to fight a lawsuit over mismanagement of the $5.5 million in annual revenues collected under the Property and Business Improvement District (PBID).
An October 11 email from Luis Ojeda, the person in charge of overseeing assessment districts for the city, denied the partnership's request to pay for legal fees using money collected as part of the Downtown PBID.
"We are deducting $5,000 from July 2013 request and $1,882.50 from August 2013 request (both for legal fees). Based on legal advice we received, all subsequent legal fees regarding [the] San Diegans for Open Government [case]...will not be reimbursed at this time," read the email from Ojeda, which the Reader obtained through a California Public Records Act request.
News of the rejection came one month after a September meeting at which PBID advisory board members approved setting aside $100,000 to hire Colantuono and Levin, a specialty law firm headquartered in Sacramento. (The same lawyers were hired to file suit against former mayor Bob Filner in an attempt to force the release of Tourism Marketing District dollars.)
The suit from watchdog group San Diegans for Open Government was filed in August of this year and accuses the partnership of having free rein to spend money collected from property owners in the five downtown neighborhoods that make up the downtown PBID.
Critics of the private/non-profit organization claim head of the partnership (and former chief of staff for Jerry Sanders), Kris Michell, and the board of directors have had an open mind when interpreting the law governing assessment districts. That interpretation has allowed them to open the checkbook for goals such as ridding downtown streets of panhandlers, preventing public urination, or any other issue said to "detract from the business being conducted" in San Diego's downtown neighborhoods.
The partnership has also directed taxpayer revenues to pay for the organization's new business plan, the Downtown Partnership's new logo, and their fresh new website.
The next hearing is set for November 22 with superior court judge Ronald Styn.
Comments