Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Special election wins power for the people of Encinitas
They, not councilmembers, will decide density and height zoning matters
With an extremely high voter turnout for a one-issue special election, over 40 percent of Encinitas’ voters turned out on June 18 to express their opinion on Proposition A — the Right to Vote Initiative.
A classic fight between community activists and developers, the initiative requires the city to put to a vote any proposed “up zoning” and maximum-building-height increases in development plans.
The initiative passed with 51.85 percent of the vote. The slim victory is not expected to change much when the remaining provisional and absentee ballots are counted.
The initiative’s signature-gathering campaign began last year when the then–empaneled, pro-development city council began working on updating the city’s general plan. The proposed plan would have allowed the addition of mixed-use residential and offices, primarily as second stories on top of existing shopping centers along the El Camino Real corridor. It would have doubled the density around the major arterial roadway.
As the signature gathering began, voters in last November’s 2012 general election replaced two of the four pro-development councilpersons with pro-community-rights candidates. The bigger-is-not-better sympathizers then had a three-to-two council majority.
But the signature gatherers continued their efforts with the objective to write into law the requirement for a public vote on zoning issues pertaining to density and height, thus removing authority from the five-person council.
The grassroots organization’s success in getting the initiative to the ballot caused a bit of a rift between the new councilmembers and the voters that elected them in November. All five councilmembers, upon the advice of the city’s legal council and staff recommendations, came out against Prop. A. This surprised the voter base that had just put their two new councilpersons into office.
Lots of money from shopping-center owners, developers, and out-of-area real estate political action committees was dumped into the “No on A” campaign. The Encinitas Right to Vote organization hung out in front of those same shopping centers, encouraging a “Yes on A” vote.
Former Encinitas mayors Pam Slater-Price, Sheila Cameron, Dennis Holz, and Gail Hano all endorsed Prop. A. As retired San Diego County supervisor Slater-Price stated, this was the most important election in the city’s history, next to the 1986 incorporation vote.
Former mayors Christy Guerin and Jerome Stocks opposed Prop. A.
Jim Kydd, publisher of the weekly Coast News, took a big gamble in editorially endorsing Prop. A. In times before the 1980s incorporation, when former local newspaper the Coast Dispatch would endorse a slow-growth candidate or issue, every one of the city’s real estate agencies would boycott the paper and pull their advertising for two weeks. No such protest is planned this time around.
The special election cost the city around $400,000. Law mandated the special election because the initiative petition was signed by more than 15 percent of the city’s registered voters. Had the tally been between 10 percent (minimum to qualify) and 14.9 percent, the initiative would have had to wait for a general election in June or November of 2014.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Special election wins power for the people of Encinitas
They, not councilmembers, will decide density and height zoning matters
Special election wins power for the people of Encinitas
They, not councilmembers, will decide density and height zoning matters
With an extremely high voter turnout for a one-issue special election, over 40 percent of Encinitas’ voters turned out on June 18 to express their opinion on Proposition A — the Right to Vote Initiative.
A classic fight between community activists and developers, the initiative requires the city to put to a vote any proposed “up zoning” and maximum-building-height increases in development plans.
The initiative passed with 51.85 percent of the vote. The slim victory is not expected to change much when the remaining provisional and absentee ballots are counted.
The initiative’s signature-gathering campaign began last year when the then–empaneled, pro-development city council began working on updating the city’s general plan. The proposed plan would have allowed the addition of mixed-use residential and offices, primarily as second stories on top of existing shopping centers along the El Camino Real corridor. It would have doubled the density around the major arterial roadway.
As the signature gathering began, voters in last November’s 2012 general election replaced two of the four pro-development councilpersons with pro-community-rights candidates. The bigger-is-not-better sympathizers then had a three-to-two council majority.
But the signature gatherers continued their efforts with the objective to write into law the requirement for a public vote on zoning issues pertaining to density and height, thus removing authority from the five-person council.
The grassroots organization’s success in getting the initiative to the ballot caused a bit of a rift between the new councilmembers and the voters that elected them in November. All five councilmembers, upon the advice of the city’s legal council and staff recommendations, came out against Prop. A. This surprised the voter base that had just put their two new councilpersons into office.
Lots of money from shopping-center owners, developers, and out-of-area real estate political action committees was dumped into the “No on A” campaign. The Encinitas Right to Vote organization hung out in front of those same shopping centers, encouraging a “Yes on A” vote.
Former Encinitas mayors Pam Slater-Price, Sheila Cameron, Dennis Holz, and Gail Hano all endorsed Prop. A. As retired San Diego County supervisor Slater-Price stated, this was the most important election in the city’s history, next to the 1986 incorporation vote.
Former mayors Christy Guerin and Jerome Stocks opposed Prop. A.
Jim Kydd, publisher of the weekly Coast News, took a big gamble in editorially endorsing Prop. A. In times before the 1980s incorporation, when former local newspaper the Coast Dispatch would endorse a slow-growth candidate or issue, every one of the city’s real estate agencies would boycott the paper and pull their advertising for two weeks. No such protest is planned this time around.
The special election cost the city around $400,000. Law mandated the special election because the initiative petition was signed by more than 15 percent of the city’s registered voters. Had the tally been between 10 percent (minimum to qualify) and 14.9 percent, the initiative would have had to wait for a general election in June or November of 2014.
Comments