Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Storm-ending bombs?
Heymatt: If we can develop bombs that level whole cities, why can’t scientists come up with the same stuff to obliterate tornadoes before landfall? What is it in these tornadoes that can’t be neutralized? Tornadoes are visible and can be tracked; hence, they can be attacked.
— Bien Cielo Zara, Mira Mesa
Every year or two, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration fields inquiries about “nuking hurricanes” as storm season approaches. The logic is, in part, sound. Vicious storms such as tornadoes and hurricanes are caused by radical pressure and temperature differentials in the air. Dropping a massive bomb into the eye of the storm could, in theory, disrupt the flow of energy enough to dissipate the storm. There are many problems with this. Firstly, nuclear fallout would spread gleefully around the world on the remaining air currents, causing untold havoc for years to come. With hurricanes, there’s also a question of scale. The average hurricane expends more energy in one second than a 21 kiloton nuclear weapon (like the Fat Man bomb from WWII). A weapon large enough to disrupt a hurricane would be a “civilization ender” in and of itself, and you can see why tossing one of those around is a bad idea.
Tornadoes, while similar, are much smaller and might be disrupted by the heat and pressure effects of the shockwave from a tactical nuclear weapon. But tornadoes spring up quickly and unpredictably, doing their damage and running out of juice before they could be nuked. Also, they form inland and only do real damage when they strike urban areas. Dropping nukes on your own cities to thwart severe thunderstorms is, if not outright insane, at least counterproductive.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Storm-ending bombs?
Storm-ending bombs?
Heymatt: If we can develop bombs that level whole cities, why can’t scientists come up with the same stuff to obliterate tornadoes before landfall? What is it in these tornadoes that can’t be neutralized? Tornadoes are visible and can be tracked; hence, they can be attacked.
— Bien Cielo Zara, Mira Mesa
Every year or two, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration fields inquiries about “nuking hurricanes” as storm season approaches. The logic is, in part, sound. Vicious storms such as tornadoes and hurricanes are caused by radical pressure and temperature differentials in the air. Dropping a massive bomb into the eye of the storm could, in theory, disrupt the flow of energy enough to dissipate the storm. There are many problems with this. Firstly, nuclear fallout would spread gleefully around the world on the remaining air currents, causing untold havoc for years to come. With hurricanes, there’s also a question of scale. The average hurricane expends more energy in one second than a 21 kiloton nuclear weapon (like the Fat Man bomb from WWII). A weapon large enough to disrupt a hurricane would be a “civilization ender” in and of itself, and you can see why tossing one of those around is a bad idea.
Tornadoes, while similar, are much smaller and might be disrupted by the heat and pressure effects of the shockwave from a tactical nuclear weapon. But tornadoes spring up quickly and unpredictably, doing their damage and running out of juice before they could be nuked. Also, they form inland and only do real damage when they strike urban areas. Dropping nukes on your own cities to thwart severe thunderstorms is, if not outright insane, at least counterproductive.
Comments