Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Tied up in notes
Congressman Scott Peters is entangled in a sticky campaign finance web of his own spinning.
Newly installed Democratic congressman Scott Peters is already entangled in some nagging post-election financial disclosure questions, courtesy of the Federal Election Commission. In a letter to Peters campaign treasurer Nancy Haley, dated January 4, the agency raised issues about his so-called post election filing, covering the reporting period from October 18 through November 6 of last year. “Schedule A of your report indicates that your committee may have failed to file one or more of the required 48-hour notices regarding ‘last minute’ contributions received by your committee after the close of books for the 12 Day Pre-General Report,” the letter says. “To ensure that the Commission is notified of last minute contributions of $1,000 or more to your campaign, it is recommended that you review your procedures for checking contributions received during the aforementioned time period. The failure to file 48-hour notices may result in civil money penalties or legal enforcement action. If any contribution of $1,000 or more was incorrectly reported, you must amend your original report with the clarifying information.” A response from the Peters camp is due by February 8. Asked for comment, Peters spokesperson MaryAnne Pintar responded in an email: “It’s a standard letter. Any issues will be addressed promptly by our Treasurer.”
Here's something you might be interested in.
Tied up in notes
Tied up in notes
Congressman Scott Peters is entangled in a sticky campaign finance web of his own spinning.
Newly installed Democratic congressman Scott Peters is already entangled in some nagging post-election financial disclosure questions, courtesy of the Federal Election Commission. In a letter to Peters campaign treasurer Nancy Haley, dated January 4, the agency raised issues about his so-called post election filing, covering the reporting period from October 18 through November 6 of last year. “Schedule A of your report indicates that your committee may have failed to file one or more of the required 48-hour notices regarding ‘last minute’ contributions received by your committee after the close of books for the 12 Day Pre-General Report,” the letter says. “To ensure that the Commission is notified of last minute contributions of $1,000 or more to your campaign, it is recommended that you review your procedures for checking contributions received during the aforementioned time period. The failure to file 48-hour notices may result in civil money penalties or legal enforcement action. If any contribution of $1,000 or more was incorrectly reported, you must amend your original report with the clarifying information.” A response from the Peters camp is due by February 8. Asked for comment, Peters spokesperson MaryAnne Pintar responded in an email: “It’s a standard letter. Any issues will be addressed promptly by our Treasurer.”
Comments