Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
New suit filed challenging forest fees
A group of hikers has filed a new suit challenging the legality of the U.S. Forest Service’s practice of requiring “Adventure Pass” fees to access what the bureau deems “high impact recreation areas” in four Southern California National Forests, including eastern San Diego County’s 460,000 acre Cleveland National Forest.
The Adventure Pass has drawn criticism from hikers, cyclists, and equestrians since its introduction in 1996. Park and forest users say that their taxes already pay for preservation and maintenance of the areas, and the current suit claims that the implementation of fees for use of public lands has diminished both the enjoyment and frequency of their visits.
Resistance to the fees was so great, the plaintiffs say, that in 2004 Congress stopped renewing the Adventure Pass program.
In order to get around the program’s expiration, however, the Forest Service has designated 31 sections of the Cleveland National Forest, the Angeles National Forest just north of Los Angeles, the Los Padres National Forest spanning from Ventura north to Monterey, and the San Bernardino Forest located in the mountain range of the same name, as high impact areas, which still require the Pass for entry.
“[W]hile the Forest Service is authorized to charge visitors an 'amenity fee' for use of developed facilities and services, it may not simply charge an 'entrance fee' to an area when visitors do not use those facilities and services,” reads a portion of the complaint.
The plaintiffs say that if they are not using amenities such as restrooms, picnic areas, or campgrounds (which they admit require upkeep at a cost beyond basic Forest Service funding), they should not be compelled to pay fees simply to enter parklands.
Here's something you might be interested in.
New suit filed challenging forest fees
New suit filed challenging forest fees
A group of hikers has filed a new suit challenging the legality of the U.S. Forest Service’s practice of requiring “Adventure Pass” fees to access what the bureau deems “high impact recreation areas” in four Southern California National Forests, including eastern San Diego County’s 460,000 acre Cleveland National Forest.
The Adventure Pass has drawn criticism from hikers, cyclists, and equestrians since its introduction in 1996. Park and forest users say that their taxes already pay for preservation and maintenance of the areas, and the current suit claims that the implementation of fees for use of public lands has diminished both the enjoyment and frequency of their visits.
Resistance to the fees was so great, the plaintiffs say, that in 2004 Congress stopped renewing the Adventure Pass program.
In order to get around the program’s expiration, however, the Forest Service has designated 31 sections of the Cleveland National Forest, the Angeles National Forest just north of Los Angeles, the Los Padres National Forest spanning from Ventura north to Monterey, and the San Bernardino Forest located in the mountain range of the same name, as high impact areas, which still require the Pass for entry.
“[W]hile the Forest Service is authorized to charge visitors an 'amenity fee' for use of developed facilities and services, it may not simply charge an 'entrance fee' to an area when visitors do not use those facilities and services,” reads a portion of the complaint.
The plaintiffs say that if they are not using amenities such as restrooms, picnic areas, or campgrounds (which they admit require upkeep at a cost beyond basic Forest Service funding), they should not be compelled to pay fees simply to enter parklands.
Comments