Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
The Five-Year Engagement, a Spinning but Aimless Turnstile of Gags
Emily Blunt rescues parts of The Five-Year Engagement, but not the movie.
Movie
Five-Year Engagement *
Emily Blunt is so honestly appealing that she saves moments, but nothing can save the film. Director Nicholas Stoller wrote this glib junk with actor Jason Segel, who has many moments of stupid, fumbling vulnerability as a young chef resentful when teacher Blunt outpaces him. Engaged, they push off marriage, and the main reason (unspoken) is that they never seem like a couple. Pathetic, often crude jokes extend their silly predicament in dumb ways, though Blunt keeps this mess intermittently watchable.
Emily Blunt is so sanely appealing that her honest touches rescue parts of The Five-Year Engagement, but not the movie. What could? Director Nicholas Stoller wrote it with actor Jason Segel, who gave himself a showcase as Tom, engaged to Violet (Blunt). They meet cute in San Francisco (poorly shot, which is an achievement), then fail to get married after moving to Michigan for Violet’s academic career.
Resentful Tom, formerly a rising chef, works in a mediocre shop, grows a beard, drinks, learns to kill deer, and makes dull meals of venison. The one clear reason the couple are not yet married is never spoken: they lack real chemistry together. Blunt has sure, unforced charisma. But Segel is like a sitcom variation of Brendan Fraser and is given too many close-ups (also butt shots).
He plods through the ridiculous plot, a spinning but aimless turnstile of gags about Tom Hanks, Princess Diana, Star Trek, Gwyneth Paltrow, a lesbian chef, ethic types, Michael Jordan, the Cookie Monster, Midwestern dolts, frostbite, tacos, Violet’s smarmy boss (Rhys Ifans), dead grandparents, kids, vomiting, and many sex performance jokes.
In this chick flick full of chatty tangents, comedy often seems targeted to a young male demographic. Is that for a unisex balance of crass laughs? When a pretty blonde suddenly spews crude abuse at Tom, it feels unfair to her, him, and us. These dumb comedies are running out of ways to shock us, and they lack the screwball wit to cover their silly, gaping contrivances.
Here's something you might be interested in.
The Five-Year Engagement, a Spinning but Aimless Turnstile of Gags
The Five-Year Engagement, a Spinning but Aimless Turnstile of Gags
Emily Blunt rescues parts of The Five-Year Engagement, but not the movie.
Movie
Five-Year Engagement *
Emily Blunt is so honestly appealing that she saves moments, but nothing can save the film. Director Nicholas Stoller wrote this glib junk with actor Jason Segel, who has many moments of stupid, fumbling vulnerability as a young chef resentful when teacher Blunt outpaces him. Engaged, they push off marriage, and the main reason (unspoken) is that they never seem like a couple. Pathetic, often crude jokes extend their silly predicament in dumb ways, though Blunt keeps this mess intermittently watchable.
Emily Blunt is so sanely appealing that her honest touches rescue parts of The Five-Year Engagement, but not the movie. What could? Director Nicholas Stoller wrote it with actor Jason Segel, who gave himself a showcase as Tom, engaged to Violet (Blunt). They meet cute in San Francisco (poorly shot, which is an achievement), then fail to get married after moving to Michigan for Violet’s academic career.
Resentful Tom, formerly a rising chef, works in a mediocre shop, grows a beard, drinks, learns to kill deer, and makes dull meals of venison. The one clear reason the couple are not yet married is never spoken: they lack real chemistry together. Blunt has sure, unforced charisma. But Segel is like a sitcom variation of Brendan Fraser and is given too many close-ups (also butt shots).
He plods through the ridiculous plot, a spinning but aimless turnstile of gags about Tom Hanks, Princess Diana, Star Trek, Gwyneth Paltrow, a lesbian chef, ethic types, Michael Jordan, the Cookie Monster, Midwestern dolts, frostbite, tacos, Violet’s smarmy boss (Rhys Ifans), dead grandparents, kids, vomiting, and many sex performance jokes.
In this chick flick full of chatty tangents, comedy often seems targeted to a young male demographic. Is that for a unisex balance of crass laughs? When a pretty blonde suddenly spews crude abuse at Tom, it feels unfair to her, him, and us. These dumb comedies are running out of ways to shock us, and they lack the screwball wit to cover their silly, gaping contrivances.
Comments