Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Advice to City Council: Don’t Ask for It
Councilman David Alvarez received the last conflict-of-interest advice letter from the Ethics Commission.
Tomorrow is Friday the 13th, and the date marks an anniversary that some political insiders say may signify bad news for transparency at San Diego’s city hall. It was one year ago tomorrow that the City’s Ethics Commission issued its most recent official conflict-of-interest advice letter to a city official. The historic missive went to Democratic city councilman David Alvarez regarding how he should conduct himself on the council in light of some property he owned in the Dells Imperial district in Southeast San Diego. Alvarez had written to inquire whether his real estate would bar him from voting on a proposed redevelopment plan for the area. The short answer: “You may not, as a general rule, participate” in the vote, but if “the decision will impact your property interests in substantially the same manner that it impacts the ‘public generally,’” then “you may lawfully participate in the decision.”
Since that day last April, no one at the City has seen a need to ask Ethics Commission staffers for formal advice regarding potential conflicts of interest, confirms executive director Stacey Fulhorst. There was also a relative paucity of requests in 2010, with only 3 letters being issued, and just 2 in 2009. In 2008, a total of 8 letters went out, with titles including “Disqualification from Municipal Decisions Involving Spouse,” “Disqualification from Municipal Decision Based on Prior Employment,” and “Transferring Funds in 2004 Committee to 2008 Committee.”
In 2007, 7 letters were issued; and in 2006 there were 11. Peak demand came in 2003 and 2004, when 12 letters were dispatched each year. Fulhorst says that these days more requests for “informal” advice are being made and responded to, which reduces the need for official letters. There is no record kept of the informal queries, she explains.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Advice to City Council: Don’t Ask for It
Advice to City Council: Don’t Ask for It
Councilman David Alvarez received the last conflict-of-interest advice letter from the Ethics Commission.
Tomorrow is Friday the 13th, and the date marks an anniversary that some political insiders say may signify bad news for transparency at San Diego’s city hall. It was one year ago tomorrow that the City’s Ethics Commission issued its most recent official conflict-of-interest advice letter to a city official. The historic missive went to Democratic city councilman David Alvarez regarding how he should conduct himself on the council in light of some property he owned in the Dells Imperial district in Southeast San Diego. Alvarez had written to inquire whether his real estate would bar him from voting on a proposed redevelopment plan for the area. The short answer: “You may not, as a general rule, participate” in the vote, but if “the decision will impact your property interests in substantially the same manner that it impacts the ‘public generally,’” then “you may lawfully participate in the decision.”
Since that day last April, no one at the City has seen a need to ask Ethics Commission staffers for formal advice regarding potential conflicts of interest, confirms executive director Stacey Fulhorst. There was also a relative paucity of requests in 2010, with only 3 letters being issued, and just 2 in 2009. In 2008, a total of 8 letters went out, with titles including “Disqualification from Municipal Decisions Involving Spouse,” “Disqualification from Municipal Decision Based on Prior Employment,” and “Transferring Funds in 2004 Committee to 2008 Committee.”
In 2007, 7 letters were issued; and in 2006 there were 11. Peak demand came in 2003 and 2004, when 12 letters were dispatched each year. Fulhorst says that these days more requests for “informal” advice are being made and responded to, which reduces the need for official letters. There is no record kept of the informal queries, she explains.
Comments