Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Suspension of Development Fees Considered in Chula Vista
An ordinance to suspend development-impact fees in redevelopment-project areas for a period of five years was before the Chula Vista City Council on Tuesday, January 11. Impact fees, often paid by the new developer, assist with infrastructure needs created by the project. At issue was whether the suspension should apply to both residential and retail impact fees.
Many residents and entrepreneurs spoke in favor of the full suspension, emphasizing the need for retail revenues and the need for creating incentives for business.
Mayor Cheryl Cox and councilmember Pamela Bensoussan also favored suspending both fees. Bensoussan worried that Chula Vista had priced itself out of the market. She referred to a consultant study that showed “We’re more expensive in our residential component [fees] than Del Mar; we’re right up there with the most expensive city in the county.”
However, newly elected councilmember Patricia Aguilar said she could not support the suspension of retail impact fees. Aguilar asked, “Is it a good thing to use taxpayer money to subsidize private development?” If impact fees are suspended, redevelopment-tax-increment monies are used for infrastructure. She argued that tax-increment money comes from property tax.
Assistant city manager Gary Halpert responded, “It’s not a subsidy because the reality is you don’t have to build the infrastructure at all.”
Aguilar pointed out that tables in the same consultant study referred to by Bensoussan showed that Chula Vista’s retail impact fees are comparable to county averages. She also said Chula Vista’s west side, the redevelopment area in question, already had a glut of retail space.
After the proposed ordinance went down to a defeat, the council passed a substitute ordinance that suspends the collection of fees charged for market-rate residential, excluding the bayfront area — but not retail. However, the ordinance did suspend fees for retail, office, and industrial space in the Otay Valley Road redevelopment area and suspended the fees for industrial in the southwest redevelopment area.
Aguilar also raised the larger question that is haunting California at this time: does redevelopment revenue really come back to the City over time? Cox has asked the staff to study this question.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Suspension of Development Fees Considered in Chula Vista
Suspension of Development Fees Considered in Chula Vista
An ordinance to suspend development-impact fees in redevelopment-project areas for a period of five years was before the Chula Vista City Council on Tuesday, January 11. Impact fees, often paid by the new developer, assist with infrastructure needs created by the project. At issue was whether the suspension should apply to both residential and retail impact fees.
Many residents and entrepreneurs spoke in favor of the full suspension, emphasizing the need for retail revenues and the need for creating incentives for business.
Mayor Cheryl Cox and councilmember Pamela Bensoussan also favored suspending both fees. Bensoussan worried that Chula Vista had priced itself out of the market. She referred to a consultant study that showed “We’re more expensive in our residential component [fees] than Del Mar; we’re right up there with the most expensive city in the county.”
However, newly elected councilmember Patricia Aguilar said she could not support the suspension of retail impact fees. Aguilar asked, “Is it a good thing to use taxpayer money to subsidize private development?” If impact fees are suspended, redevelopment-tax-increment monies are used for infrastructure. She argued that tax-increment money comes from property tax.
Assistant city manager Gary Halpert responded, “It’s not a subsidy because the reality is you don’t have to build the infrastructure at all.”
Aguilar pointed out that tables in the same consultant study referred to by Bensoussan showed that Chula Vista’s retail impact fees are comparable to county averages. She also said Chula Vista’s west side, the redevelopment area in question, already had a glut of retail space.
After the proposed ordinance went down to a defeat, the council passed a substitute ordinance that suspends the collection of fees charged for market-rate residential, excluding the bayfront area — but not retail. However, the ordinance did suspend fees for retail, office, and industrial space in the Otay Valley Road redevelopment area and suspended the fees for industrial in the southwest redevelopment area.
Aguilar also raised the larger question that is haunting California at this time: does redevelopment revenue really come back to the City over time? Cox has asked the staff to study this question.
Comments