Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Controversy on Deck
“Is there any more comments?” asked Pacific Beach Town Council president Rose Galliher at the monthly meeting on June 16. Community members had just commented on the motion read by Scott Chipman, “That the Pacific Beach Town Council take a mail-in vote of the general membership and ask the following question: Shall the town council provide a letter of support for a premise expansion of the PB Shore Club to allow alcohol consumption till 2:00 a.m. on a proposed 1895-square-foot deck, and which would increase the maximum occupancy from 126 to 312 persons?... I assume the Shore Club will provide statement for.”
Some public comments included: “This audience does not reflect a balanced vote — that’s why it has to be a mail-in vote”; “Let’s listen to what the general membership has to say. There are almost 600 members”; “Word on the street is that people are really not in favor of the expansion.”
The council voiced concern about the cost of the mail-in ballot. A few community members expressed worries about “bought votes” (also mentioned during the May meeting), with references made to the Shore Club potentially purchasing town-council memberships for community members. A few expressed the importance of only current members being allowed to participate in the mail-in ballot.
“If a lot of memberships are bought between now and [the Shore Club’s] presentation or now and the ballot,” said a resident, “they can all vote and that’s fine, but I’d hate to see the town council get manipulated by moneyed interest.”
A community member who supports the expansion said, “We’re asked to come, we show up, and we’re looked at as a bought vote.”
Town-council vice president Ruby Houck along with another council member whispered and giggled while adding up the votes on the motion; both their backs were turned to the audience.
“What’s goin' on? I’d like to hear it,” yelled a resident.
Sixty-nine community members voted: 35 voted in favor, 34 in opposition.
As to the issue of “buying memberships,” Galliher said in a follow-up interview: “You have to remember we are just a liaison between our Pacific Beach Town Council members and [the San Diego] City Council. Whatever is brought to us, we make recommendations. We want people to be invested. You are not required to live in Pacific Beach but have to have an interest in Pacific Beach or work in Pacific Beach to be a member."
Cost of an annual membership? $20, individual; $25, family or service group; $50, business.
For the video version of this story, click here.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Controversy on Deck
Controversy on Deck
“Is there any more comments?” asked Pacific Beach Town Council president Rose Galliher at the monthly meeting on June 16. Community members had just commented on the motion read by Scott Chipman, “That the Pacific Beach Town Council take a mail-in vote of the general membership and ask the following question: Shall the town council provide a letter of support for a premise expansion of the PB Shore Club to allow alcohol consumption till 2:00 a.m. on a proposed 1895-square-foot deck, and which would increase the maximum occupancy from 126 to 312 persons?... I assume the Shore Club will provide statement for.”
Some public comments included: “This audience does not reflect a balanced vote — that’s why it has to be a mail-in vote”; “Let’s listen to what the general membership has to say. There are almost 600 members”; “Word on the street is that people are really not in favor of the expansion.”
The council voiced concern about the cost of the mail-in ballot. A few community members expressed worries about “bought votes” (also mentioned during the May meeting), with references made to the Shore Club potentially purchasing town-council memberships for community members. A few expressed the importance of only current members being allowed to participate in the mail-in ballot.
“If a lot of memberships are bought between now and [the Shore Club’s] presentation or now and the ballot,” said a resident, “they can all vote and that’s fine, but I’d hate to see the town council get manipulated by moneyed interest.”
A community member who supports the expansion said, “We’re asked to come, we show up, and we’re looked at as a bought vote.”
Town-council vice president Ruby Houck along with another council member whispered and giggled while adding up the votes on the motion; both their backs were turned to the audience.
“What’s goin' on? I’d like to hear it,” yelled a resident.
Sixty-nine community members voted: 35 voted in favor, 34 in opposition.
As to the issue of “buying memberships,” Galliher said in a follow-up interview: “You have to remember we are just a liaison between our Pacific Beach Town Council members and [the San Diego] City Council. Whatever is brought to us, we make recommendations. We want people to be invested. You are not required to live in Pacific Beach but have to have an interest in Pacific Beach or work in Pacific Beach to be a member."
Cost of an annual membership? $20, individual; $25, family or service group; $50, business.
For the video version of this story, click here.
Comments