Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Flip-flop
Back in 1997, Chargers owner Alex Spanos didn’t have anything at all good to say about voter referendums. That was when the multimillionaire developer was waging war against San Diegans who were seeking to put taxpayer financing of a $78 million addition to Jack Murphy Stadium on the ballot. Spanos lost that battle when thousands of citizens lined up to sign petitions in record time to put the project before voters. He went on to win the war when the city council — led by then-Mayor Susan Golding, a beneficiary of Spanos campaign cash — killed the public vote by canceling $18 million of the public financing and selling the stadium naming rights to Qualcomm for the same amount; a judge later upheld the backstage deal.
But now, in his hometown of Stockton, Spanos is mounting his very own referendum drive. Last month the city council there reached a settlement with state attorney general Jerry Brown, who threatened a lawsuit challenging the city’s Spanos-favored general plan allowing urban sprawl and a doubling of the city’s population by 2035. The deal with Brown calls for “green standards” for new buildings and other ways to reduce greenhouse gases. In response, Spanos has formed a referendum committee to put the settlement on the ballot.
Called the Alliance for Responsible Planning, the group is running newspaper ads claiming that “the public was shut out of the process that led to the dramatic changes that have just been made to the Stockton General Plan.” That drew an incredulous editorial response from the Stockton Record: “Come on, the Spanos Cos., one of the most savvy, aggressive and deep-pocketed developers around, was cut out of the process? If so, it likely would be a first. No, the Spanos Cos. liked the developer-driven General Plan approved earlier but does not like what it perceives to be the green-leaning, in-fill-promoting settlement the council worked out after being sued by the Sierra Club and threatened with a suit by Brown.”
Here's something you might be interested in.
Flip-flop
Flip-flop
Back in 1997, Chargers owner Alex Spanos didn’t have anything at all good to say about voter referendums. That was when the multimillionaire developer was waging war against San Diegans who were seeking to put taxpayer financing of a $78 million addition to Jack Murphy Stadium on the ballot. Spanos lost that battle when thousands of citizens lined up to sign petitions in record time to put the project before voters. He went on to win the war when the city council — led by then-Mayor Susan Golding, a beneficiary of Spanos campaign cash — killed the public vote by canceling $18 million of the public financing and selling the stadium naming rights to Qualcomm for the same amount; a judge later upheld the backstage deal.
But now, in his hometown of Stockton, Spanos is mounting his very own referendum drive. Last month the city council there reached a settlement with state attorney general Jerry Brown, who threatened a lawsuit challenging the city’s Spanos-favored general plan allowing urban sprawl and a doubling of the city’s population by 2035. The deal with Brown calls for “green standards” for new buildings and other ways to reduce greenhouse gases. In response, Spanos has formed a referendum committee to put the settlement on the ballot.
Called the Alliance for Responsible Planning, the group is running newspaper ads claiming that “the public was shut out of the process that led to the dramatic changes that have just been made to the Stockton General Plan.” That drew an incredulous editorial response from the Stockton Record: “Come on, the Spanos Cos., one of the most savvy, aggressive and deep-pocketed developers around, was cut out of the process? If so, it likely would be a first. No, the Spanos Cos. liked the developer-driven General Plan approved earlier but does not like what it perceives to be the green-leaning, in-fill-promoting settlement the council worked out after being sued by the Sierra Club and threatened with a suit by Brown.”
Comments